simpleware scanip (Simpleware Ltd)
86
Structured Review
Simpleware Ltd
simpleware scanip
Simpleware Scanip, supplied by Simpleware Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/synopsys+simpleware+scanip+image+processing+software/scanip+simpleware/pmc09950282-30-23-23
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Simpleware Scanip, supplied by Simpleware Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/synopsys+simpleware+scanip+image+processing+software/scanip+simpleware/pmc09950282-30-23-23
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simpleware scanip - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
86/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Polymer:Article Title: Scalable DICOM 3D-printed phantoms mimicking marine mammal bone and soft tissue. Article Snippet: AR TIC LE IN PR ES S ARTICLE IN PRESS 21/2 6 hydrogels with additive conductors (carbon nanotubes, polyaniline, etc.) and ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCs) are novel candidates for phantom electroactive platforms36–40. .. Inspired by Hunt et al.’s incorporation of coiled polymer actuators into a biomimetic harbor porpoise pectoral flipper, similar methodologies using Article Title: Scalable DICOM 3D-printed phantoms mimicking marine mammal bone and soft tissue Article Snippet: Electroactive polymers (EAPs) such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) gels, and hydrogels with additive conductors (carbon nanotubes, polyaniline, etc.) and ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCs) are novel candidates for phantom electroactive platforms – . .. Inspired by Hunt et al.’s incorporation of coiled polymer actuators into a biomimetic harbor porpoise pectoral flipper, similar methodologies using Software:Article Title: Patient-Specific Lattice Implants for Segmental Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction (Part 2): CT-Based Personalization, Design Workflows and Validation-A Review. Article Snippet: .. Year, Ref [n] Lattice UC (mm; X × Y × Z) T (mm) PS (μm) RD/ Porosity (%) SA/VR (mm−1) Gradient (Type) Gradient Driver Design Objective(s) CAD Software 2019, [69] Honeycomb scaffold (square/triangular pores) Scaffold block: 32 × 25.5 × 13.5 0.2032 1250 (square/triangular pores) ≈68–83 (designed layer blocks); ≈82 (femur middiaphysis scaffold) NR None (uniform porearchitecture per pattern) N/A Design ABS FDM scaffolds with controlled pore size and porosity to achieve cortical bone-like stiffness and strength in a femur mid-diaphysis segment; study influence of FDM process parameters on structural modulus and compressive strength CATIA and Insight (Stratasys Fortus 360mc) 2019, [2] Patient-specific truss-type titanium cage (additively manufactured) Anatomical cage spanning femoral segmental defect; truss microarchitecture not specified NR NR NR (highly porous cage intended for large-volume bone graft packing) NR None (no explicit porosity or stiffness gradient; geometry matched to defect) N/A Custom 3D-printed titanium cage used with the Masquelet technique to reconstruct massive segmental femoral defects, restore alignment/length, provide immediate mechanical stability, and create a contained space for large volumes of bone graft within an induced membrane Manufacturerspecific tools (exact CAD software NR) 2020, [9] TPMS gyroid (GP); hybrid: gyroid + cortical-like outer shell (GPRC) 0.81 (equivalent unit cell) 0.18–0.23 (outer shell); internal NR 430 (freemoving sphere) GP: 60; GPRC: 43 NR None (GP); morphology hybrid (shell and lattice) (GPRC) Rule-based (fixed shell; not CT-guided gradient) Fit 3 mm rat femoral defect; target pore for ingrowth (430 μm); add shell to boost Blocking Assay:Article Title: Patient-Specific Lattice Implants for Segmental Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction (Part 2): CT-Based Personalization, Design Workflows and Validation-A Review. Article Snippet: .. Year, Ref [n] Lattice UC (mm; X × Y × Z) T (mm) PS (μm) RD/ Porosity (%) SA/VR (mm−1) Gradient (Type) Gradient Driver Design Objective(s) CAD Software 2019, [69] Honeycomb scaffold (square/triangular pores) Scaffold block: 32 × 25.5 × 13.5 0.2032 1250 (square/triangular pores) ≈68–83 (designed layer blocks); ≈82 (femur middiaphysis scaffold) NR None (uniform porearchitecture per pattern) N/A Design ABS FDM scaffolds with controlled pore size and porosity to achieve cortical bone-like stiffness and strength in a femur mid-diaphysis segment; study influence of FDM process parameters on structural modulus and compressive strength CATIA and Insight (Stratasys Fortus 360mc) 2019, [2] Patient-specific truss-type titanium cage (additively manufactured) Anatomical cage spanning femoral segmental defect; truss microarchitecture not specified NR NR NR (highly porous cage intended for large-volume bone graft packing) NR None (no explicit porosity or stiffness gradient; geometry matched to defect) N/A Custom 3D-printed titanium cage used with the Masquelet technique to reconstruct massive segmental femoral defects, restore alignment/length, provide immediate mechanical stability, and create a contained space for large volumes of bone graft within an induced membrane Manufacturerspecific tools (exact CAD software NR) 2020, [9] TPMS gyroid (GP); hybrid: gyroid + cortical-like outer shell (GPRC) 0.81 (equivalent unit cell) 0.18–0.23 (outer shell); internal NR 430 (freemoving sphere) GP: 60; GPRC: 43 NR None (GP); morphology hybrid (shell and lattice) (GPRC) Rule-based (fixed shell; not CT-guided gradient) Fit 3 mm rat femoral defect; target pore for ingrowth (430 μm); add shell to boost Pore Size:Article Title: Patient-Specific Lattice Implants for Segmental Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction (Part 2): CT-Based Personalization, Design Workflows and Validation-A Review. Article Snippet: .. Year, Ref [n] Lattice UC (mm; X × Y × Z) T (mm) PS (μm) RD/ Porosity (%) SA/VR (mm−1) Gradient (Type) Gradient Driver Design Objective(s) CAD Software 2019, [69] Honeycomb scaffold (square/triangular pores) Scaffold block: 32 × 25.5 × 13.5 0.2032 1250 (square/triangular pores) ≈68–83 (designed layer blocks); ≈82 (femur middiaphysis scaffold) NR None (uniform porearchitecture per pattern) N/A Design ABS FDM scaffolds with controlled pore size and porosity to achieve cortical bone-like stiffness and strength in a femur mid-diaphysis segment; study influence of FDM process parameters on structural modulus and compressive strength CATIA and Insight (Stratasys Fortus 360mc) 2019, [2] Patient-specific truss-type titanium cage (additively manufactured) Anatomical cage spanning femoral segmental defect; truss microarchitecture not specified NR NR NR (highly porous cage intended for large-volume bone graft packing) NR None (no explicit porosity or stiffness gradient; geometry matched to defect) N/A Custom 3D-printed titanium cage used with the Masquelet technique to reconstruct massive segmental femoral defects, restore alignment/length, provide immediate mechanical stability, and create a contained space for large volumes of bone graft within an induced membrane Manufacturerspecific tools (exact CAD software NR) 2020, [9] TPMS gyroid (GP); hybrid: gyroid + cortical-like outer shell (GPRC) 0.81 (equivalent unit cell) 0.18–0.23 (outer shell); internal NR 430 (freemoving sphere) GP: 60; GPRC: 43 NR None (GP); morphology hybrid (shell and lattice) (GPRC) Rule-based (fixed shell; not CT-guided gradient) Fit 3 mm rat femoral defect; target pore for ingrowth (430 μm); add shell to boost Membrane:Article Title: Patient-Specific Lattice Implants for Segmental Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction (Part 2): CT-Based Personalization, Design Workflows and Validation-A Review. Article Snippet: .. Year, Ref [n] Lattice UC (mm; X × Y × Z) T (mm) PS (μm) RD/ Porosity (%) SA/VR (mm−1) Gradient (Type) Gradient Driver Design Objective(s) CAD Software 2019, [69] Honeycomb scaffold (square/triangular pores) Scaffold block: 32 × 25.5 × 13.5 0.2032 1250 (square/triangular pores) ≈68–83 (designed layer blocks); ≈82 (femur middiaphysis scaffold) NR None (uniform porearchitecture per pattern) N/A Design ABS FDM scaffolds with controlled pore size and porosity to achieve cortical bone-like stiffness and strength in a femur mid-diaphysis segment; study influence of FDM process parameters on structural modulus and compressive strength CATIA and Insight (Stratasys Fortus 360mc) 2019, [2] Patient-specific truss-type titanium cage (additively manufactured) Anatomical cage spanning femoral segmental defect; truss microarchitecture not specified NR NR NR (highly porous cage intended for large-volume bone graft packing) NR None (no explicit porosity or stiffness gradient; geometry matched to defect) N/A Custom 3D-printed titanium cage used with the Masquelet technique to reconstruct massive segmental femoral defects, restore alignment/length, provide immediate mechanical stability, and create a contained space for large volumes of bone graft within an induced membrane Manufacturerspecific tools (exact CAD software NR) 2020, [9] TPMS gyroid (GP); hybrid: gyroid + cortical-like outer shell (GPRC) 0.81 (equivalent unit cell) 0.18–0.23 (outer shell); internal NR 430 (freemoving sphere) GP: 60; GPRC: 43 NR None (GP); morphology hybrid (shell and lattice) (GPRC) Rule-based (fixed shell; not CT-guided gradient) Fit 3 mm rat femoral defect; target pore for ingrowth (430 μm); add shell to boost Derivative Assay:Article Title: Patient-Specific Lattice Implants for Segmental Femoral and Tibial Reconstruction (Part 2): CT-Based Personalization, Design Workflows and Validation-A Review. Article Snippet: .. Year, Ref [n] Lattice UC (mm; X × Y × Z) T (mm) PS (μm) RD/ Porosity (%) SA/VR (mm−1) Gradient (Type) Gradient Driver Design Objective(s) CAD Software 2019, [69] Honeycomb scaffold (square/triangular pores) Scaffold block: 32 × 25.5 × 13.5 0.2032 1250 (square/triangular pores) ≈68–83 (designed layer blocks); ≈82 (femur middiaphysis scaffold) NR None (uniform porearchitecture per pattern) N/A Design ABS FDM scaffolds with controlled pore size and porosity to achieve cortical bone-like stiffness and strength in a femur mid-diaphysis segment; study influence of FDM process parameters on structural modulus and compressive strength CATIA and Insight (Stratasys Fortus 360mc) 2019, [2] Patient-specific truss-type titanium cage (additively manufactured) Anatomical cage spanning femoral segmental defect; truss microarchitecture not specified NR NR NR (highly porous cage intended for large-volume bone graft packing) NR None (no explicit porosity or stiffness gradient; geometry matched to defect) N/A Custom 3D-printed titanium cage used with the Masquelet technique to reconstruct massive segmental femoral defects, restore alignment/length, provide immediate mechanical stability, and create a contained space for large volumes of bone graft within an induced membrane Manufacturerspecific tools (exact CAD software NR) 2020, [9] TPMS gyroid (GP); hybrid: gyroid + cortical-like outer shell (GPRC) 0.81 (equivalent unit cell) 0.18–0.23 (outer shell); internal NR 430 (freemoving sphere) GP: 60; GPRC: 43 NR None (GP); morphology hybrid (shell and lattice) (GPRC) Rule-based (fixed shell; not CT-guided gradient) Fit 3 mm rat femoral defect; target pore for ingrowth (430 μm); add shell to boost other:Article Title: Impacts of mixing techniques and vacuum levels on the structural and mechanical properties of PMMA bone cement: A comparative study. Article Snippet: The three-dimensional distribution of pores was visualised using Article Title: Impacts of mixing techniques and vacuum levels on the structural and mechanical properties of PMMA bone cement: A comparative study Article Snippet: The three-dimensional distribution of pores was visualised using Article Title: Scalable DICOM 3D-printed phantoms mimicking marine mammal bone and soft tissue. Article Snippet: Estimated material volumes for each modeled tissue layer based on |