Review



low stimulation pulse device  (Helius Medical Technologies Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Helius Medical Technologies Inc low stimulation pulse device
    Low Stimulation Pulse Device, supplied by Helius Medical Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/low+stimulation+pulse+device/pmc08367107-47-9-23
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    low stimulation pulse device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Cranial Nerve Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Adults With Neurological Conditions: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Article Snippet: Low-frequency pulses, however, are only delivered by the low stimulation pulse device that has been developed exclusively for research purposes (personal communication from Helius Medical Technologies, May 2021).



    Similar Products

    stimulation device  (Micromed Inc)
    86
    Micromed Inc stimulation device
    Stimulation Device, supplied by Micromed Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/device+stimulation/pm42263353-231-9-13
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stimulation device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    stimulation device  (Aurora Scientific)
    86
    Aurora Scientific stimulation device
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    Stimulation Device, supplied by Aurora Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/device+stimulation/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__29__721663-202-6-8
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stimulation device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    portable stimulation device  (Chattanooga Group)
    86
    Chattanooga Group portable stimulation device
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    Portable Stimulation Device, supplied by Chattanooga Group, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/device+portable+stimulation/pmc13143629-140-8-13
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    portable stimulation device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    1 × 1 tdcs mini ct stimulator device  (Soterix Medical)
    86
    Soterix Medical 1 × 1 tdcs mini ct stimulator device
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    1 × 1 Tdcs Mini Ct Stimulator Device, supplied by Soterix Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/1+1+ct+mini+stimulator+tdcs+%C3%97/pmc12978831-104-57-64
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    1 × 1 tdcs mini ct stimulator device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    electro stimulation device ed  (Autodesk Inc)
    86
    Autodesk Inc electro stimulation device ed
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    Electro Stimulation Device Ed, supplied by Autodesk Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/device+ed+electro+stimulation/pm41702225-137-1-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    electro stimulation device ed - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    transcranial electrical stimulation device  (Soterix Medical)
    86
    Soterix Medical transcranial electrical stimulation device
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Device, supplied by Soterix Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/definition+hd+ifs+interferential+stimulation+system/10__1109_slash_tnsre__2026__3673180-73-7-11
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    transcranial electrical stimulation device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    spinal cord stimulation devices  (Boston Scientific Corporation)
    86
    Boston Scientific Corporation spinal cord stimulation devices
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices, supplied by Boston Scientific Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/cord+scs+spinal+stimulator+systems/pm41335088-40-10-4
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spinal cord stimulation devices - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    animal dcs stimulator model 2100 device  (Soterix Medical)
    86
    Soterix Medical animal dcs stimulator model 2100 device
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    Animal Dcs Stimulator Model 2100 Device, supplied by Soterix Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/2100+animal+dcs+device+model+stimulator/pm41283910-45-64-54
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    animal dcs stimulator model 2100 device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    ti stimulation device  (Soterix Medical)
    86
    Soterix Medical ti stimulation device
    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic <t>stimulation.</t> uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.
    Ti Stimulation Device, supplied by Soterix Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stimulation+device/device+stimulation+ti/pm41266335-296-6-11
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ti stimulation device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Active and Passive Mechanical Deficits Precede Spinal Curvature in a Zebrafish Model of Idiopathic Scoliosis

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.29.721663

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Active force generation is reduced in 5 d.p.f. uts2r3 mutant larval trunks. (A) Schematic of the ex vivo larval trunk mechanics assay. Isolated 5 d.p.f. preparations were mounted between a length motor and force transducer for mechanical testing. Sarcomere striations were visualized and used to measure muscle length before mechanical assessment. (A’) Representative image of a mounted 5 d.p.f. trunk preparation, with the expanded view showing sarcomere striations. (B) Cross-sectional area of larval trunk preparations, calculated from dorsal-ventral and lateral diameter measurements assuming an elliptical cross section. Cross-sectional area did not differ between wild-type and uts2r3 mutant specimens ( p = 0.495; WT, n = 10; uts2r3 , n = 11). (C) Maximal tension generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated reduced tension compared with wild type, with a significant reduction during tetanic stimulation. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (D) Maximal force generated during twitch and tetanic stimulation. uts2r3 mutants generated significantly less force under both stimulation conditions. WT, n = 9; uts2r3 , n = 10. (E) Force depression during shortening contractions, expressed as percent reduction from isometric force at the same length. No significant differences were detected across contractile velocities. WT, n = 8; uts2r3 , n = 7. Bars show means ± SD with individual specimens shown as points.

    Article Snippet: Stimulation was provided using a constant-current stimulation device (Aurora Scientific), with supramaximal current determined independently for each sample preparation before mechanical assessment.

    Techniques: Mutagenesis, Ex Vivo, Isolation, Generated