Review




Structured Review

NeuroPace implantable device neuropace rns® system
Implantable Device Neuropace Rns® System, supplied by NeuroPace, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/rns+neurostimulator/pmc06019859-7-3-5
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
implantable device neuropace rns® system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars

Images

Related Articles

Functional Assay:

Article Title: Seizure onset classification and stimulation parameter selection
Article Snippet: NeuroPace, Inc. (Mountain View, Calif.) manufactures and sells one such neurostimulator under the trade name “RNS” for treating epilepsy.

Article Title: Pediatric neuromodulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: Survey of current practices, techniques, and outcomes across US epilepsy centers
Article Snippet: Please use Likert scale of 1= least likely and 5= most likely least likely somewhat less likely somewhat likely more likely most likely (most important factor) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for RNS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for RNS (something about semiology of seizures) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for DBS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for DBS (something about semiology of seizures) Evidence of efficacy in the literature Battery life in RNS and need for replacement ( scalp surgery versus chest surgery) 16/11/2023 11:57am projectredcap.org Battery life in DBS and need for replacement (scalp surgery versus chest surgery) Insurance and what it will allow Where patient lives and availability of programming Post operative support from Neuropace Post operative support from Medtronics ( if using DBS) Perceived need for future MRI brain (say child with tuberous sclerosis ) Possibility of future resection in bilateral pathology and value of chronic ECOG Patient's preference (cosmetic, skull lesion, effort in uploading data, etc) Comorbitiies (mood eg severe depression)

Article Title: Low-profile intercranial device
Article Snippet: For example, at least one functional component may comprise features similar to the RNS® System (available from Neuropace of Mountain View, CA), for example, a cranially implantable programmable RNS® Neurostimulator that senses and records brain electrical activity.

Article Title: Increase in seizure activity is associated with change to daylight savings time as identified by an implanted thalamic neurostimulator in bilateral thalamic centrum medianum nuclei
Article Snippet: © 2024 European Society of Medicine 1 1 Department of Neurology Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine 2 Department of Neurosurgery Tufts Medical Center 3 Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHED 31 July 2024

Article Title: Treatment for loss of control disorders
Article Snippet: This example will leverage the device development experience of NeuroPace, Inc. and its existing RNS® neurostimulator hardware platform to develop a system that incorporates novel software advances designed to anticipate and attenuate LOC eating. rRNS System Development and Testing Strategy (1) Prototype rRNS System Software Algorithm Development/Testing.

Article Title: A method for precisely timed, on-demand intracranial stimulation using the RNS device.
Article Snippet: NeuroPace provided the RNS neurostimulator and electrodes at no cost.

Activity Assay:

Article Title: Seizure onset classification and stimulation parameter selection
Article Snippet: NeuroPace, Inc. (Mountain View, Calif.) manufactures and sells one such neurostimulator under the trade name “RNS” for treating epilepsy.

Article Title: Pediatric neuromodulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: Survey of current practices, techniques, and outcomes across US epilepsy centers
Article Snippet: Please use Likert scale of 1= least likely and 5= most likely least likely somewhat less likely somewhat likely more likely most likely (most important factor) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for RNS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for RNS (something about semiology of seizures) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for DBS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for DBS (something about semiology of seizures) Evidence of efficacy in the literature Battery life in RNS and need for replacement ( scalp surgery versus chest surgery) 16/11/2023 11:57am projectredcap.org Battery life in DBS and need for replacement (scalp surgery versus chest surgery) Insurance and what it will allow Where patient lives and availability of programming Post operative support from Neuropace Post operative support from Medtronics ( if using DBS) Perceived need for future MRI brain (say child with tuberous sclerosis ) Possibility of future resection in bilateral pathology and value of chronic ECOG Patient's preference (cosmetic, skull lesion, effort in uploading data, etc) Comorbitiies (mood eg severe depression)

Article Title: Low-profile intercranial device
Article Snippet: For example, at least one functional component may comprise features similar to the RNS® System (available from Neuropace of Mountain View, CA), for example, a cranially implantable programmable RNS® Neurostimulator that senses and records brain electrical activity.

Article Title: Increase in seizure activity is associated with change to daylight savings time as identified by an implanted thalamic neurostimulator in bilateral thalamic centrum medianum nuclei
Article Snippet: © 2024 European Society of Medicine 1 1 Department of Neurology Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine 2 Department of Neurosurgery Tufts Medical Center 3 Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHED 31 July 2024

Article Title: Treatment for loss of control disorders
Article Snippet: This example will leverage the device development experience of NeuroPace, Inc. and its existing RNS® neurostimulator hardware platform to develop a system that incorporates novel software advances designed to anticipate and attenuate LOC eating. rRNS System Development and Testing Strategy (1) Prototype rRNS System Software Algorithm Development/Testing.

Article Title: A method for precisely timed, on-demand intracranial stimulation using the RNS device.
Article Snippet: NeuroPace provided the RNS neurostimulator and electrodes at no cost.

Battery:

Article Title: Seizure onset classification and stimulation parameter selection
Article Snippet: NeuroPace, Inc. (Mountain View, Calif.) manufactures and sells one such neurostimulator under the trade name “RNS” for treating epilepsy.

Article Title: Pediatric neuromodulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: Survey of current practices, techniques, and outcomes across US epilepsy centers
Article Snippet: Please use Likert scale of 1= least likely and 5= most likely least likely somewhat less likely somewhat likely more likely most likely (most important factor) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for RNS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for RNS (something about semiology of seizures) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for DBS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for DBS (something about semiology of seizures) Evidence of efficacy in the literature Battery life in RNS and need for replacement ( scalp surgery versus chest surgery) 16/11/2023 11:57am projectredcap.org Battery life in DBS and need for replacement (scalp surgery versus chest surgery) Insurance and what it will allow Where patient lives and availability of programming Post operative support from Neuropace Post operative support from Medtronics ( if using DBS) Perceived need for future MRI brain (say child with tuberous sclerosis ) Possibility of future resection in bilateral pathology and value of chronic ECOG Patient's preference (cosmetic, skull lesion, effort in uploading data, etc) Comorbitiies (mood eg severe depression)

Article Title: Low-profile intercranial device
Article Snippet: For example, at least one functional component may comprise features similar to the RNS® System (available from Neuropace of Mountain View, CA), for example, a cranially implantable programmable RNS® Neurostimulator that senses and records brain electrical activity.

Article Title: Increase in seizure activity is associated with change to daylight savings time as identified by an implanted thalamic neurostimulator in bilateral thalamic centrum medianum nuclei
Article Snippet: © 2024 European Society of Medicine 1 1 Department of Neurology Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine 2 Department of Neurosurgery Tufts Medical Center 3 Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHED 31 July 2024

Article Title: Treatment for loss of control disorders
Article Snippet: This example will leverage the device development experience of NeuroPace, Inc. and its existing RNS® neurostimulator hardware platform to develop a system that incorporates novel software advances designed to anticipate and attenuate LOC eating. rRNS System Development and Testing Strategy (1) Prototype rRNS System Software Algorithm Development/Testing.

Article Title: A method for precisely timed, on-demand intracranial stimulation using the RNS device.
Article Snippet: NeuroPace provided the RNS neurostimulator and electrodes at no cost.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging:

Article Title: Seizure onset classification and stimulation parameter selection
Article Snippet: NeuroPace, Inc. (Mountain View, Calif.) manufactures and sells one such neurostimulator under the trade name “RNS” for treating epilepsy.

Article Title: Pediatric neuromodulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: Survey of current practices, techniques, and outcomes across US epilepsy centers
Article Snippet: Please use Likert scale of 1= least likely and 5= most likely least likely somewhat less likely somewhat likely more likely most likely (most important factor) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for RNS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for RNS (something about semiology of seizures) Factor affecting decision: surgeon preference for DBS ( training and comfort with procedure) Factor affecting decision: physician preference for DBS (something about semiology of seizures) Evidence of efficacy in the literature Battery life in RNS and need for replacement ( scalp surgery versus chest surgery) 16/11/2023 11:57am projectredcap.org Battery life in DBS and need for replacement (scalp surgery versus chest surgery) Insurance and what it will allow Where patient lives and availability of programming Post operative support from Neuropace Post operative support from Medtronics ( if using DBS) Perceived need for future MRI brain (say child with tuberous sclerosis ) Possibility of future resection in bilateral pathology and value of chronic ECOG Patient's preference (cosmetic, skull lesion, effort in uploading data, etc) Comorbitiies (mood eg severe depression)

Article Title: Low-profile intercranial device
Article Snippet: For example, at least one functional component may comprise features similar to the RNS® System (available from Neuropace of Mountain View, CA), for example, a cranially implantable programmable RNS® Neurostimulator that senses and records brain electrical activity.

Article Title: Increase in seizure activity is associated with change to daylight savings time as identified by an implanted thalamic neurostimulator in bilateral thalamic centrum medianum nuclei
Article Snippet: © 2024 European Society of Medicine 1 1 Department of Neurology Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine 2 Department of Neurosurgery Tufts Medical Center 3 Department of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHED 31 July 2024

Article Title: Treatment for loss of control disorders
Article Snippet: This example will leverage the device development experience of NeuroPace, Inc. and its existing RNS® neurostimulator hardware platform to develop a system that incorporates novel software advances designed to anticipate and attenuate LOC eating. rRNS System Development and Testing Strategy (1) Prototype rRNS System Software Algorithm Development/Testing.

Article Title: A method for precisely timed, on-demand intracranial stimulation using the RNS device.
Article Snippet: NeuroPace provided the RNS neurostimulator and electrodes at no cost.



Similar Products

90
NeuroPace rns® system
Rns® System, supplied by NeuroPace, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/rns+system/nct04004169-5-11-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rns® system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress rn 1734
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
Rn 1734, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/RN-1734/pmc13675666-80-26-36
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rn 1734 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Hamilton Company gauge needle
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
Gauge Needle, supplied by Hamilton Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/34+gauge%2C+Small+Hub+RN+Needle%2C+custom+length+(0%2E375%2C+0%2E5%2C+1%2E0%2C+and+1%2E5+in)%2C+point+style+3+or+4%2C+6-PK/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__10__14__759217-272-14-17
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gauge needle - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Elabscience Biotechnology gastric 82 jo rn al p
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
Gastric 82 Jo Rn Al P, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/Mouse+GIP+(Gastric+Inhibitory+Polypeptide)+ELISA+Kit/pm42869365-61-1-29
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gastric 82 jo rn al p - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Hamilton Company 33 gauge needle
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
33 Gauge Needle, supplied by Hamilton Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/33+gauge%2C+Small+Hub+RN+Needle%2C+custom+length+(0%2E4+to+12+in)%2C+point+style+2%2C+3%2C+or+4%2C+6-PK/10__1186_slash_s12974___026___04075___9-49-16-19
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
33 gauge needle - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Hamilton Company 26 gauge needle
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
26 Gauge Needle, supplied by Hamilton Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/26+gauge%2C+Small+Hub+RN+Needle%2C+custom+length+(0%2E4+to+12+in)%2C+point+style+2%2C+3%2C+or+4%2C+6-PK/10__3390_slash_antib15050089-155-26-31
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
26 gauge needle - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Hamilton Company 34g needle
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
34g Needle, supplied by Hamilton Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/34+gauge%2C+Small+Hub+RN+Needle%2C+custom+length+(0%2E375%2C+0%2E5%2C+1%2E0%2C+and+1%2E5+in)%2C+point+style+3+or+4%2C+6-PK/10__1038_slash_s41467___026___77949___4-430-34-36
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
34g needle - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Hamilton Company hamilton microsyringe
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
Hamilton Microsyringe, supplied by Hamilton Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/Microliter+Syringe+Model+65+RN%2C+Small+Removable+Needle%2C+Needle+Sold+Separately/10__1038_slash_s42003___026___10891___9-246-1-1
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hamilton microsyringe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Hamilton Company microsyringe
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
Microsyringe, supplied by Hamilton Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/Microliter+Syringe+Model+65+RN%2C+Small+Removable+Needle%2C+Needle+Sold+Separately/10__1038_slash_s42003___026___10972___9-349-4-6
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microsyringe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Hamilton Company microliter syringe
5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 <t>antagonist</t> <t>RN‐1734</t> (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.
Microliter Syringe, supplied by Hamilton Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rns/Model+901+Removable+Needle+(RN)+Syringe%2C+26s+gauge%2C+point+style+2/10__1038_slash_s41598___026___69651___8-82-11-14
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microliter syringe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 antagonist RN‐1734 (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: The Serotonergic and Cholinergic Signaling Pathways Drive Gastric Precancerous Lesions and Its Potential Mechanism

doi: 10.1111/cas.70563

Figure Lengend Snippet: 5‐HTR1D and TPRV4 were involved in 5‐HT‐induced currents in gastric cells. Representative vehicle control recordings showing that application of the vehicle (≤ 5% DMSO in extracellular solution) alone did not induce detectable membrane currents in GES‐1 (a), AGS (b), or MKN45 (c) cells. (d) The change rate of currents induced by vehicle in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (e–g) Representative whole‐cell currents recorded in GES‐1 (e), AGS (f), and MKN45 (g) cells in response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and subsequent inhibition by the selective 5‐HTR1D antagonist LY310762 (10 μM). (h) The change rate of currents induced by LY‐310762 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (i–k) Representative whole‐cell current recordings in GES‐1 (i), AGS (j), and MKN45 (k) cells showing the response to 5‐HT (30 μM) and its suppression by the selective TRPV4 antagonist RN‐1734 (10 μM). (l) The change rate of current induced by RN‐1734 in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN45 cells. (m,q) qRT‐PCR analysis of TRPV4 mRNA expression following transfection with three independent TRPV4 siRNA sequences in AGS and MKN45 cells, respectively; siRNA‐2 exhibited the highest knockdown efficiency and was used for subsequent electrophysiology experiments. (n–p) Representative whole‐cell currents evoked by 5‐HT in AGS cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, and corresponding quantification of peak current amplitudes (p). (r–t) Representative 5‐HT‐triggered current traces from MKN45 cells transfected with negative control siRNA or TRPV4 siRNA‐2, along with statistical analysis of maximum current magnitudes (t). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus GES‐1 or scrambled siRNA control.

Article Snippet: The 5‐HTR1D antagonist group was administered LY310762 (1 mg/kg/day in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. GC17138, Glpbio, USA) [ ], and the TRPV4 antagonist group received RN‐1734 (10 μmol/L in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. HY‐19975, MedChemExpress, USA).

Techniques: Control, Membrane, Inhibition, Quantitative RT-PCR, Analysis, Expressing, Transfection, Knockdown, Negative Control

5‐HTR1D and TRPV4 are involved in intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia of stomach with concomitant reduction of AKT/mTOR activation. (a) Schematic diagram of the GPL modeling protocol and experimental timeline. (b) Administration of 5‐HTR1D antagonist or TRPV4 antagonist significantly attenuated the GPL‐induced decrease in body weight ( n = 12). (c) Representative gastric mucosal morphology of mice in 4 groups. (d) Representative AB‐PAS staining of gastric mucosa of mice in 4 groups. (e) 5‐HTR1D mRNA expression in gastric tissues from control and GPL mice, determined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 6). (f) Representative Western blot bands showing protein levels of AKT, p‐AKT, mTOR, and p‐mTOR in gastric mucosal tissues of 4 groups. (g–j) Quantitative analysis of AKT (g), p‐AKT (h), mTOR (i), and p‐mTOR (j) expression levels ( n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus Control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus GPL group.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: The Serotonergic and Cholinergic Signaling Pathways Drive Gastric Precancerous Lesions and Its Potential Mechanism

doi: 10.1111/cas.70563

Figure Lengend Snippet: 5‐HTR1D and TRPV4 are involved in intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia of stomach with concomitant reduction of AKT/mTOR activation. (a) Schematic diagram of the GPL modeling protocol and experimental timeline. (b) Administration of 5‐HTR1D antagonist or TRPV4 antagonist significantly attenuated the GPL‐induced decrease in body weight ( n = 12). (c) Representative gastric mucosal morphology of mice in 4 groups. (d) Representative AB‐PAS staining of gastric mucosa of mice in 4 groups. (e) 5‐HTR1D mRNA expression in gastric tissues from control and GPL mice, determined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 6). (f) Representative Western blot bands showing protein levels of AKT, p‐AKT, mTOR, and p‐mTOR in gastric mucosal tissues of 4 groups. (g–j) Quantitative analysis of AKT (g), p‐AKT (h), mTOR (i), and p‐mTOR (j) expression levels ( n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus Control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus GPL group.

Article Snippet: The 5‐HTR1D antagonist group was administered LY310762 (1 mg/kg/day in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. GC17138, Glpbio, USA) [ ], and the TRPV4 antagonist group received RN‐1734 (10 μmol/L in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. HY‐19975, MedChemExpress, USA).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Morphology, Staining, Expressing, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Analysis

Expression of 5‐HT and ACh and M3R/5‐HT co‐localization in gastric antral tissues of GPL model mice. (a) 5‐HT levels were measured by ELISA. (b) Representative images showing M3R/5‐HT co‐localization in gastric antral mucosa, as detected by immunofluorescence. (c) The increased percentage of M3R/5‐HT co‐localization neurons in GPL mice. (d) ACh expression was determined using ELISA. (e) The schematic diagram of FG retrograding test. (f) The FG labeling ChAT‐positive neurons in the DMV 7 days after FG injection ( n = 6). (g) Representative images showing c‐Fos expression of ChAT‐positive neurons in control, GPL, LY310762 and RN1734 groups. (h) The percentage of c‐Fos + DMV cholinergic neurons in all groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). Scale bar: 100 μm. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus Control; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus GPL group.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: The Serotonergic and Cholinergic Signaling Pathways Drive Gastric Precancerous Lesions and Its Potential Mechanism

doi: 10.1111/cas.70563

Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of 5‐HT and ACh and M3R/5‐HT co‐localization in gastric antral tissues of GPL model mice. (a) 5‐HT levels were measured by ELISA. (b) Representative images showing M3R/5‐HT co‐localization in gastric antral mucosa, as detected by immunofluorescence. (c) The increased percentage of M3R/5‐HT co‐localization neurons in GPL mice. (d) ACh expression was determined using ELISA. (e) The schematic diagram of FG retrograding test. (f) The FG labeling ChAT‐positive neurons in the DMV 7 days after FG injection ( n = 6). (g) Representative images showing c‐Fos expression of ChAT‐positive neurons in control, GPL, LY310762 and RN1734 groups. (h) The percentage of c‐Fos + DMV cholinergic neurons in all groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). Scale bar: 100 μm. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus Control; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus GPL group.

Article Snippet: The 5‐HTR1D antagonist group was administered LY310762 (1 mg/kg/day in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. GC17138, Glpbio, USA) [ ], and the TRPV4 antagonist group received RN‐1734 (10 μmol/L in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. HY‐19975, MedChemExpress, USA).

Techniques: Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Immunofluorescence, Labeling, Injection, Control

The graphical abstract of the proposed mechanism through which the central neural system may modulate the GPL process. Vagal cholinergic neurons may promote gastric 5‐HT secretion, which may contribute to gastric precancerous lesions through 5‐HTR1D and TRPV4, highlighting these as candidate targets for early intervention.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: The Serotonergic and Cholinergic Signaling Pathways Drive Gastric Precancerous Lesions and Its Potential Mechanism

doi: 10.1111/cas.70563

Figure Lengend Snippet: The graphical abstract of the proposed mechanism through which the central neural system may modulate the GPL process. Vagal cholinergic neurons may promote gastric 5‐HT secretion, which may contribute to gastric precancerous lesions through 5‐HTR1D and TRPV4, highlighting these as candidate targets for early intervention.

Article Snippet: The 5‐HTR1D antagonist group was administered LY310762 (1 mg/kg/day in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. GC17138, Glpbio, USA) [ ], and the TRPV4 antagonist group received RN‐1734 (10 μmol/L in 0.4 mL vehicle; Cat. No. HY‐19975, MedChemExpress, USA).

Techniques: