Review



mouse olfactory bulb st data  (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 86
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc mouse olfactory bulb st data
    Analysis of <t>mouse</t> <t>olfactory</t> <t>bulb</t> <t>data.</t> a) H&E staining of the olfactory bulb (top) and the deconvolution results of all candidate methods displayed by the spatial scatter pie plot of cell‐type composition on each spatial location. The examined cell types were granule cells (GC), olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), periglomerular cells (PGC), mitral/tufted cells (M‐TC), and external plexiform layer interneurons (EPL‐IN) b) Manual annotation of anatomic layers (top), including the granule cell layer (GCL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the glomerular layer (GL), and the nerve layer (ONL), and the spatial domains of different deconvolution methods visualized by spatial scatters of specific domain types. c) Performance comparison between candidate deconvolution methods, including QR‐SIDE, STdeconvolve, CARDfree, RCTD, CARD, SPOTlight, and spatialDWLS in terms of NMI (left) and ARI (right). d) UMAP plots of gene expression for Topic 1, 2, 3 identified by QR‐SIDE. The color scheme of each topic domain was the same as in (b). e) The heatmap of normalized expression level for the top 10 DE genes for topic domain 1, 2, 3. f) The correlation between DE genes of identified domains and marker genes of each cell type. g) The mean expression level of an example marker gene list for QR‐SIDE, where Tyro3 was included as the interference marker gene of cell type GC. h) Left and middle panels: The estimated spot‐separable η scores of correct marker Penk and misclassified marker Tyro3 . Right panel: The line plots of mean η of all markers across all spatial spots and the RMSE between estimated cell‐type composition by varying the inclusion of top 3‐7 marker genes of each cell type as the input gene list and the deconvolution results using high‐quality marker genes (as shown in a).
    Mouse Olfactory Bulb St Data, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/resolution+spatial+transcriptomics+st/pmc12103236-331-3-9?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse olfactory bulb st data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Robust Spatial Cell‐Type Deconvolution with Qualitative Reference for Spatial Transcriptomics"

    Article Title: Robust Spatial Cell‐Type Deconvolution with Qualitative Reference for Spatial Transcriptomics

    Journal: Small Methods

    doi: 10.1002/smtd.202401145

    Analysis of mouse olfactory bulb data. a) H&E staining of the olfactory bulb (top) and the deconvolution results of all candidate methods displayed by the spatial scatter pie plot of cell‐type composition on each spatial location. The examined cell types were granule cells (GC), olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), periglomerular cells (PGC), mitral/tufted cells (M‐TC), and external plexiform layer interneurons (EPL‐IN) b) Manual annotation of anatomic layers (top), including the granule cell layer (GCL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the glomerular layer (GL), and the nerve layer (ONL), and the spatial domains of different deconvolution methods visualized by spatial scatters of specific domain types. c) Performance comparison between candidate deconvolution methods, including QR‐SIDE, STdeconvolve, CARDfree, RCTD, CARD, SPOTlight, and spatialDWLS in terms of NMI (left) and ARI (right). d) UMAP plots of gene expression for Topic 1, 2, 3 identified by QR‐SIDE. The color scheme of each topic domain was the same as in (b). e) The heatmap of normalized expression level for the top 10 DE genes for topic domain 1, 2, 3. f) The correlation between DE genes of identified domains and marker genes of each cell type. g) The mean expression level of an example marker gene list for QR‐SIDE, where Tyro3 was included as the interference marker gene of cell type GC. h) Left and middle panels: The estimated spot‐separable η scores of correct marker Penk and misclassified marker Tyro3 . Right panel: The line plots of mean η of all markers across all spatial spots and the RMSE between estimated cell‐type composition by varying the inclusion of top 3‐7 marker genes of each cell type as the input gene list and the deconvolution results using high‐quality marker genes (as shown in a).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of mouse olfactory bulb data. a) H&E staining of the olfactory bulb (top) and the deconvolution results of all candidate methods displayed by the spatial scatter pie plot of cell‐type composition on each spatial location. The examined cell types were granule cells (GC), olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), periglomerular cells (PGC), mitral/tufted cells (M‐TC), and external plexiform layer interneurons (EPL‐IN) b) Manual annotation of anatomic layers (top), including the granule cell layer (GCL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the glomerular layer (GL), and the nerve layer (ONL), and the spatial domains of different deconvolution methods visualized by spatial scatters of specific domain types. c) Performance comparison between candidate deconvolution methods, including QR‐SIDE, STdeconvolve, CARDfree, RCTD, CARD, SPOTlight, and spatialDWLS in terms of NMI (left) and ARI (right). d) UMAP plots of gene expression for Topic 1, 2, 3 identified by QR‐SIDE. The color scheme of each topic domain was the same as in (b). e) The heatmap of normalized expression level for the top 10 DE genes for topic domain 1, 2, 3. f) The correlation between DE genes of identified domains and marker genes of each cell type. g) The mean expression level of an example marker gene list for QR‐SIDE, where Tyro3 was included as the interference marker gene of cell type GC. h) Left and middle panels: The estimated spot‐separable η scores of correct marker Penk and misclassified marker Tyro3 . Right panel: The line plots of mean η of all markers across all spatial spots and the RMSE between estimated cell‐type composition by varying the inclusion of top 3‐7 marker genes of each cell type as the input gene list and the deconvolution results using high‐quality marker genes (as shown in a).

    Techniques Used: Staining, Comparison, Gene Expression, Expressing, Marker



    Similar Products

    salus sts high resolution spatial transcriptomics  (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)
    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc salus sts high resolution spatial transcriptomics
    <t>Salus-STS</t> <t>high-resolution</t> spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.
    Salus Sts High Resolution Spatial Transcriptomics, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/resolution+spatial+transcriptomics+st/pmc12832764-4-5-7?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    salus sts high resolution spatial transcriptomics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (st)  (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)
    90
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (st)
    <t>Salus-STS</t> <t>high-resolution</t> spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.
    High Resolution Spatial Transcriptomics (St), supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/resolution+spatial+transcriptomics+st/pm39097166-7-24-25?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (st) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    resolution spatial transcriptomics st  (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)
    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc resolution spatial transcriptomics st
    a Ground-truth segmentation of 6 cortical layers and white matter (WM) for simulated spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> data based on the annotation of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) section 151673. b Spot clustering performance on the raw data and the imputed data by CoSTCo, DTD, FIST ( λ = 0 or 0.01), and GNTD ( λ = 0 or 0.1) at different ranks in the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% or 80% zero inflation rate. c Visualization of the spatial domains detected by spot clustering on the raw data and the imputed data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% and 80% zero inflation rates. The imputed data with the best rank by each tensor decomposition method was used in the visualization. d Spatially variable genes detection comparison. The plot shows the percentage of correctly detected spatially variable genes by the AUC thresholds of the recovered highly expressed spots in the more sparse simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. e Spatial patterns visualization of three example genes by their expression in the ground-truth data, raw data, and the imputation data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. Note that in ( d ) and ( e ), a higher AUC indicates a better consistency between the imputed or raw expressions and the ground-truth expression over the spots for the gene. Source data for ( b ) and ( d ) are provided as a Source Data file.
    Resolution Spatial Transcriptomics St, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/resolution+spatial+transcriptomics+st/pmc10719260-11-5-6?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    resolution spatial transcriptomics st - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    spatial transcriptomics (st) spot size and resolution  (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)
    90
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics (st) spot size and resolution
    a Ground-truth segmentation of 6 cortical layers and white matter (WM) for simulated spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> data based on the annotation of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) section 151673. b Spot clustering performance on the raw data and the imputed data by CoSTCo, DTD, FIST ( λ = 0 or 0.01), and GNTD ( λ = 0 or 0.1) at different ranks in the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% or 80% zero inflation rate. c Visualization of the spatial domains detected by spot clustering on the raw data and the imputed data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% and 80% zero inflation rates. The imputed data with the best rank by each tensor decomposition method was used in the visualization. d Spatially variable genes detection comparison. The plot shows the percentage of correctly detected spatially variable genes by the AUC thresholds of the recovered highly expressed spots in the more sparse simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. e Spatial patterns visualization of three example genes by their expression in the ground-truth data, raw data, and the imputation data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. Note that in ( d ) and ( e ), a higher AUC indicates a better consistency between the imputed or raw expressions and the ground-truth expression over the spots for the gene. Source data for ( b ) and ( d ) are provided as a Source Data file.
    Spatial Transcriptomics (St) Spot Size And Resolution, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/resolution+spatial+transcriptomics+st/pmc07391009-146-17-15?v=Spatial+Transcriptomics+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptomics (st) spot size and resolution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.

    Journal: Frontiers in Reproductive Health

    Article Title: Spatiotemporal dynamics of spermatogenesis: insights from high-resolution spatial transcriptomics and pseudotime trajectories in mouse testes

    doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1747902

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.

    Article Snippet: In this study, we used Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (∼1 μm resolution) and Salus Cellbins Algorithm to characterize the spatial transcriptomic profile of mouse testes at single-cell level.

    Techniques:

    Cellbin-based analysis enables accurate identification of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (A) RCTD-annotated distinct cell types and their proportions. (B) UMAP visualization of the Salus-STS Cellbin data with scRNA-Seq data. (C) Spatial distribution of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (D) Integrated distribution map of cell distributions in the mouse testis. (E) Markers of distinct cell types and their expression levels. Scaled expression: the average expression level scaled across genes to eliminate the effect of total expression level differences among genes. Percentage: for each cell type, the percentage of cellbins that express the specific gene out of all cellbins of the same type.

    Journal: Frontiers in Reproductive Health

    Article Title: Spatiotemporal dynamics of spermatogenesis: insights from high-resolution spatial transcriptomics and pseudotime trajectories in mouse testes

    doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1747902

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cellbin-based analysis enables accurate identification of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (A) RCTD-annotated distinct cell types and their proportions. (B) UMAP visualization of the Salus-STS Cellbin data with scRNA-Seq data. (C) Spatial distribution of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (D) Integrated distribution map of cell distributions in the mouse testis. (E) Markers of distinct cell types and their expression levels. Scaled expression: the average expression level scaled across genes to eliminate the effect of total expression level differences among genes. Percentage: for each cell type, the percentage of cellbins that express the specific gene out of all cellbins of the same type.

    Article Snippet: In this study, we used Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (∼1 μm resolution) and Salus Cellbins Algorithm to characterize the spatial transcriptomic profile of mouse testes at single-cell level.

    Techniques: Expressing

    High-resolution spatial transcriptomics uncovers spatiotemporal markers of spermatogenesis. (A) Pseudotime trajectory analysis. (B) Randomly selected seminiferous tubules. (C,D) Top 6 genes with expression levels positively (C) and negatively (D) correlated with the axis from the tubule basement membrane (epithelium) to the lumen center respectively.

    Journal: Frontiers in Reproductive Health

    Article Title: Spatiotemporal dynamics of spermatogenesis: insights from high-resolution spatial transcriptomics and pseudotime trajectories in mouse testes

    doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1747902

    Figure Lengend Snippet: High-resolution spatial transcriptomics uncovers spatiotemporal markers of spermatogenesis. (A) Pseudotime trajectory analysis. (B) Randomly selected seminiferous tubules. (C,D) Top 6 genes with expression levels positively (C) and negatively (D) correlated with the axis from the tubule basement membrane (epithelium) to the lumen center respectively.

    Article Snippet: In this study, we used Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (∼1 μm resolution) and Salus Cellbins Algorithm to characterize the spatial transcriptomic profile of mouse testes at single-cell level.

    Techniques: Expressing, Membrane

    a Ground-truth segmentation of 6 cortical layers and white matter (WM) for simulated spatial transcriptomics data based on the annotation of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) section 151673. b Spot clustering performance on the raw data and the imputed data by CoSTCo, DTD, FIST ( λ = 0 or 0.01), and GNTD ( λ = 0 or 0.1) at different ranks in the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% or 80% zero inflation rate. c Visualization of the spatial domains detected by spot clustering on the raw data and the imputed data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% and 80% zero inflation rates. The imputed data with the best rank by each tensor decomposition method was used in the visualization. d Spatially variable genes detection comparison. The plot shows the percentage of correctly detected spatially variable genes by the AUC thresholds of the recovered highly expressed spots in the more sparse simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. e Spatial patterns visualization of three example genes by their expression in the ground-truth data, raw data, and the imputation data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. Note that in ( d ) and ( e ), a higher AUC indicates a better consistency between the imputed or raw expressions and the ground-truth expression over the spots for the gene. Source data for ( b ) and ( d ) are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GNTD: reconstructing spatial transcriptomes with graph-guided neural tensor decomposition informed by spatial and functional relations

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44017-0

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Ground-truth segmentation of 6 cortical layers and white matter (WM) for simulated spatial transcriptomics data based on the annotation of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) section 151673. b Spot clustering performance on the raw data and the imputed data by CoSTCo, DTD, FIST ( λ = 0 or 0.01), and GNTD ( λ = 0 or 0.1) at different ranks in the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% or 80% zero inflation rate. c Visualization of the spatial domains detected by spot clustering on the raw data and the imputed data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 40% and 80% zero inflation rates. The imputed data with the best rank by each tensor decomposition method was used in the visualization. d Spatially variable genes detection comparison. The plot shows the percentage of correctly detected spatially variable genes by the AUC thresholds of the recovered highly expressed spots in the more sparse simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. e Spatial patterns visualization of three example genes by their expression in the ground-truth data, raw data, and the imputation data of the simulated spatial transcriptomics data with 80% zero inflation rate. Note that in ( d ) and ( e ), a higher AUC indicates a better consistency between the imputed or raw expressions and the ground-truth expression over the spots for the gene. Source data for ( b ) and ( d ) are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: These methods range from lower resolution Spatial Transcriptomics (ST) (commercialized as 10x Genomics Visium ), to higher resolution Slide-seq , or even sub-cellular resolution technologies such as high-definition spatial transcriptomics (HDST) and Spatio-temporal enhanced resolution omics-sequencing (Stereo-seq) .

    Techniques: Comparison, Expressing