Review



proc multtest fdr test mean function  (SAS institute)


Bioz Verified Symbol SAS institute is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    SAS institute proc multtest fdr test mean function
    Proc Multtest Fdr Test Mean Function, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest+fdr+test+mean+function/pm39256883-135-7-14
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest fdr test mean function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Predicting how varying moisture conditions impact the microbiome of dust collected from the International Space Station
    Article Snippet: Taxonomy among samples was analyzed using the PROC MULTTEST FDR Test Mean function in SAS.

    Article Title: Predicting how varying moisture conditions impact the microbiome of dust collected from the International Space Station.
    Article Snippet: Taxonomy among samples was analyzed using the PROC MULTTEST FDR Test Mean function in SAS.

    Article Title: Integrating interacting drugs and genetic variations to improve the predictability of warfarin maintenance dose in Chinese patients
    Article Snippet: Results Single-nucleotide polymorphism association analysis showed that VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2 variations were highly associated with the warfarin maintenance dose.. Among 36 drugs that may interact with warfarin, fluconazole, amiodarone, and omeprazole were associated with the requirement for 45.8, 16.7, and 16.7% lower median warfarin dose (all P < 0.05 with a false discovery rate < 0.05).. The final pharmacogenetic equation explained 43.65% of interindividual variation of warfarin maintenance dose with age, body surface area, VKORC1 g.3588G > A, CYP2C9*3, CYP4F2 c.1297G > A, amiodarone, fluconazole, and diltiazem accounting for 1.97, 2.74, 24.12, 3.94, 1.64, 5.92, 2.47, and 0.84% of variation.

    Article Title: The independent contribution of miRNAs to the missing heritability in CYP3A4/5 functionality and the metabolism of atorvastatin
    Article Snippet: A false discovery rate (FDR) control was used to correct for multiple comparisons of miRNAs using the SAS PROC MULTTEST with the FDR option (SAS Institute lnc., Cary, North Carolina, USA).

    Transformation Assay:

    Article Title: Predicting how varying moisture conditions impact the microbiome of dust collected from the International Space Station
    Article Snippet: .. All relative abundance data was 275 transformed using the inverse hyperbolic sine function and combined with qPCR quantities to 276 produce an absolute abundance value as previously described.25 Taxonomy among samples was 277 analyzed using the PROC MULTTEST FDR Test Mean function in SAS. ..

    Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction:

    Article Title: Predicting how varying moisture conditions impact the microbiome of dust collected from the International Space Station
    Article Snippet: .. All relative abundance data was 275 transformed using the inverse hyperbolic sine function and combined with qPCR quantities to 276 produce an absolute abundance value as previously described.25 Taxonomy among samples was 277 analyzed using the PROC MULTTEST FDR Test Mean function in SAS. ..



    Similar Products

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest/pmc11978778-275-36-31
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest function
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Function, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest/pm39673390-92-5-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest fdr test mean function
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Fdr Test Mean Function, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest+fdr+test+mean+function/pm39256883-135-7-14
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest fdr test mean function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest procedure
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Procedure, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest+procedure/pm38609016-95-9-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest procedure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest fdr test mean
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Fdr Test Mean, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest+fdr+test+mean+function/ppr0812675-110-36-43
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest fdr test mean - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute sas proc multtest
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Sas Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/sas+proc+multtest/pm38238889-89-9-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sas proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Daytime eating during simulated night work mitigates changes in cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57846-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).

    Article Snippet: To control overall type I error in null hypothesis testing when conducting multiple comparisons, P -values from the mixed-model analysis were adjusted using False Discovery Rates ( p FDR) (PROC MULTTEST, SAS) for the primary (i.e., pNN50, RMSSD, LF/HF ratio) and secondary (PAI-1) cardiovascular outcomes.

    Techniques: Modification