Review



bootstrap procedure based on the freeman-tukey test sas proc multtest  (SAS institute)


Bioz Verified Symbol SAS institute is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    SAS institute bootstrap procedure based on the freeman-tukey test sas proc multtest
    Bootstrap Procedure Based On The Freeman Tukey Test Sas Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/bootstrap+procedure+based+on+the+freeman+tukey+test+sas+proc+multtest/pm19199267-41-21-23
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bootstrap procedure based on the freeman-tukey test sas proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: An improved prognostic parameter for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma based on the combination of three serum tumor markers.
    Article Snippet: Multiple comparisons of the rates of response to treatment between 4 groups were performed using a bootstrap procedure based on the Freeman-Tukey test (SAS PROC MULTTEST).



    Similar Products

    proc multtest  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute proc multtest
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest/pmc11978778-275-36-31
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proc multtest function  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute proc multtest function
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Function, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest/pm39673390-92-5-9
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proc multtest fdr test mean function  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute proc multtest fdr test mean function
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Fdr Test Mean Function, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest+fdr+test+mean+function/pm39256883-135-7-14
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest fdr test mean function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proc multtest procedure  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute proc multtest procedure
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Procedure, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest+procedure/pm38609016-95-9-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest procedure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    proc multtest fdr test mean  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute proc multtest fdr test mean
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Fdr Test Mean, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/proc+multtest+fdr+test+mean+function/ppr0812675-110-36-43
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest fdr test mean - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    sas proc multtest  (SAS institute)
    90
    SAS institute sas proc multtest
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Sas Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/proc+multtest/sas+proc+multtest/pm38238889-89-9-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sas proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Daytime eating during simulated night work mitigates changes in cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57846-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).

    Article Snippet: To control overall type I error in null hypothesis testing when conducting multiple comparisons, P -values from the mixed-model analysis were adjusted using False Discovery Rates ( p FDR) (PROC MULTTEST, SAS) for the primary (i.e., pNN50, RMSSD, LF/HF ratio) and secondary (PAI-1) cardiovascular outcomes.

    Techniques: Modification