Review




Structured Review

LeCroy Corporation high-voltage probe probe x 6,000 v
High Voltage Probe Probe X 6,000 V, supplied by LeCroy Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/high+voltage+probe+probe+x+6+000+v/pmc03123711-52-39-43
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
high-voltage probe probe x 6,000 v - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars

Images

Related Articles

other:

Article Title: Treatment Pulse Application for Magnetic Stimulation
Article Snippet: The current waveform of the stimulation coil was measured while changing the delay of the trigger conducting the angle of each SCR from 0 to 500 μ S. The current and voltage were measured using a high-voltage probe of (Probe X 6,000 V, Lecroy) and a Rogowski current waveform transducer (CWT, Penmuk).



Similar Products

86
Philips Healthcare x 51 cardiovascular probe
X 51 Cardiovascular Probe, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/multiplane+probe+x51/pm42154029-51-15-8
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
x 51 cardiovascular probe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
JEOL electron probe x ray 145 microanalyzer
Electron Probe X Ray 145 Microanalyzer, supplied by JEOL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/JXA-8530F+Electron+Probe+Microanalyzer/10__1016_slash_j__apsusc__2026__167228-65-13-19
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electron probe x ray 145 microanalyzer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Qiagen quantinova probe rt pcr kit
Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, <t>quantitative</t> <t>RT–PCR</t> (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.
Quantinova Probe Rt Pcr Kit, supplied by Qiagen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/Kit+for+reverse+transcription+Quantinova+Probe+RT-PCR+Kit+x+%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B500u/pmc13157077-343-36-40
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantinova probe rt pcr kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
JEOL electron probe x ray microanalyzer
Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, <t>quantitative</t> <t>RT–PCR</t> (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.
Electron Probe X Ray Microanalyzer, supplied by JEOL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/JXA-iHP200F+Electron+Probe+Microanalyzer/10__1007_slash_s10853___026___12779___9-60-12-17
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electron probe x ray microanalyzer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
JEOL energy dispersive x ray spectroscopy
Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, <t>quantitative</t> <t>RT–PCR</t> (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.
Energy Dispersive X Ray Spectroscopy, supplied by JEOL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/JXA-8230+Electron+Probe+Microanalyzer/pm41976741-53-5-29
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
energy dispersive x ray spectroscopy - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
OneLab Solutions quantinova probe rt-pcr kit x ​​100u
Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, <t>quantitative</t> <t>RT–PCR</t> (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.
Quantinova Probe Rt Pcr Kit X ​​100u, supplied by OneLab Solutions, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/QuantiNova+Probe+RT-PCR+Kit+x+%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B100u/custom%40208352%4041974220
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantinova probe rt-pcr kit x ​​100u - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
JEOL wavelength dispersive x ray spectroscopy analysis
Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, <t>quantitative</t> <t>RT–PCR</t> (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.
Wavelength Dispersive X Ray Spectroscopy Analysis, supplied by JEOL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/JXA-8530FPlus+Electron+Probe+Microanalyzer/10__1111_slash_jace__70709-29-19-15
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wavelength dispersive x ray spectroscopy analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Qiagen quantinova probe rt 742 pcr kit
Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, <t>quantitative</t> <t>RT–PCR</t> (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.
Quantinova Probe Rt 742 Pcr Kit, supplied by Qiagen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/Kit+for+reverse+transcription+Quantinova+Probe+RT-PCR+Kit+x+%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B500u/pm41933733-270-40-45
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantinova probe rt 742 pcr kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher taqman probe
Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, <t>quantitative</t> <t>RT–PCR</t> (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.
Taqman Probe, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probe+x/Triton+X-100/pm41907013-38-35-47
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
taqman probe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.

Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry

Article Title: Fortilin binds and stabilizes MEF2C, activates it through phosphorylation, and drives transcription of the cell structural and survival protein CTNNA3

doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2026.111417

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fortilin physically binds MEF2C. A, quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) analysis of THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells ( n = 3, p < 0.0001, two-sample t test). B – E, MST to characterize the interaction of fortilin with MEF2 family proteins, MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D. K d s were calculated using NanoTemper Analysis software based on the relative F norm values. F – I, in vivo forward co-IP assays. Fortilin was immunoprecipitated from the TCLs of 293T cells using an α-fortilin Ab. Successful IP of fortilin and co-IP of MEF2C and other MEF2 isoforms were assessed by Western blotting using α-fortilin Ab and Abs against MEF2A, MEF2B, MEF2C, and MEF2D, respectively. Total protein was visualized in the SDS-gel containing TCE. J, in vivo reverse co-IP assay. MEF2C was immunoprecipitated from the 293T TCL using an α-MEF2C Ab. Successful IP of MEF2C and co-IP of fortilin were assessed by Western blotting using α-MEF2C and α-fortilin Abs, respectively. Total protein was visualized in an SDS-gel containing TCE. K and L, PLA to evaluate the fortilin–MEF2C interaction. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-treated THP1 WT-fortilin and THP1 KO-fortilin cells cultured on chamber slides were subjected to a standard PLA assay using rabbit α-fortilin and mouse α-MEF2C Abs. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI ( blue ). Red puncta indicated that fortilin and MEF2C were located within 30 nm of each other. The scale bar represents 50 μm. K, the PLA interaction index was calculated as the number of PLA puncta per nucleus within a field of view and expressed in AU. Three fields were quantified for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Welch’s two-sample t test ( L ). Ab, antibody; AU, arbitrary unit; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; α-FLAG, anti-FLAG (DYKDDDDK) antibody (Ab); F norlm , normalized fluorescence value; α-fortilin, rabbit anti-fortilin monoclonal Ab; Fortilin KO, THP1 cells in which the fortilin ( TPT1 ) genes have been deleted by the CRISPR–Cas9 technology (THP1 KO-fortilin ); Fortilin WT, THP1 cells expressing WT fortilin (THP1 WT-fortilin ); α-His 6 , anti-hexahistidine Ab; IB, immunoblot; IgG, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; INPUT, 10% of TCLs used for IP; IP, immunoprecipitation; α-MEF2C, anti-MEF2C Ab; MST, microscale thermophoresis; PLA, proximity ligation assay; TCE, 2,2,2-trichloroethanol; TCL, total cell lysate.

Article Snippet: Briefly, we harvested THP1 KO-fortilin and THP1 WT-fortilin cells, isolated total RNA using the GeneJET RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no.: K0731), and subjected 50 ng of total RNA to real-time RT–qPCR using the QuantiNova Probe RT–PCR kit (QIAGEN, catalog no.: 208354) with the following primer and probe sets (Integrated DNA Technologies).

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Software, In Vivo, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, SDS-Gel, Cell Culture, Fluorescence, CRISPR, Expressing, Microscale Thermophoresis, Proximity Ligation Assay