Review



stop gefitinib stop ge  (Danaher Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Danaher Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Danaher Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 88

    Structured Review

    Danaher Inc stop gefitinib stop ge
    HGF induced <t>gefitinib</t> resistance and down‐regulated expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 in lung adenocarcinoma PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. A‐B, HGF induced gefitinib resistance in PC ‐9 (A) and HCC 827 (B) cells. Tumour cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib in the presence/absence of HGF , and cell viability was determined after 72 h of treatment by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01 compared with gefitinib group. C‐D, HGF ‐induced down‐regulated expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 in PC ‐9 (C) and HCC 827 cells (D). Tumour cells were incubated with HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 72 h, the expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 were determined by QPCR assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01 compared with control group
    Stop Gefitinib Stop Ge, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/Stop+plug/pmc06010770-68-7-9
    Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stop gefitinib stop ge - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    88/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT"

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT

    Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

    doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13629

    HGF induced gefitinib resistance and down‐regulated expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 in lung adenocarcinoma PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. A‐B, HGF induced gefitinib resistance in PC ‐9 (A) and HCC 827 (B) cells. Tumour cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib in the presence/absence of HGF , and cell viability was determined after 72 h of treatment by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01 compared with gefitinib group. C‐D, HGF ‐induced down‐regulated expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 in PC ‐9 (C) and HCC 827 cells (D). Tumour cells were incubated with HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 72 h, the expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 were determined by QPCR assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01 compared with control group
    Figure Legend Snippet: HGF induced gefitinib resistance and down‐regulated expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 in lung adenocarcinoma PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. A‐B, HGF induced gefitinib resistance in PC ‐9 (A) and HCC 827 (B) cells. Tumour cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib in the presence/absence of HGF , and cell viability was determined after 72 h of treatment by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01 compared with gefitinib group. C‐D, HGF ‐induced down‐regulated expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 in PC ‐9 (C) and HCC 827 cells (D). Tumour cells were incubated with HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 72 h, the expression of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 were determined by QPCR assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01 compared with control group

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Incubation, MTT Assay

    miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 overcame HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. A, HGF overexpression lentivirus increased the production of HGF in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. The cells were incubated in medium contained lentivirus for 48 h, and culture supernatants were harvested. The level of HGF was determined by ELISA . B, HGF overexpressed PC ‐9 and HCC 827cells increased gefitinib resistance. The PC ‐9/ NC , HCC 827/ NC , PC ‐9/ HGF , HCC 827/ HGF cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib for 72 h. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , * P < .05, ** P < .01 compared with control group. C, miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 mimics transfection reversed HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance. The PC ‐9/ HGF , HCC 827/ HGF cells were transfected with miR‐1‐3p or miR‐206 mimics for 24 h and then treated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , * P < .05, ** P < .01 compared with negative control ( NC ) group. PC ‐9/ NC and HCC 827/ NC cells: negative control lentivirus infected cells; PC ‐9/ HGF and HCC 827/ HGF cells: HGF overexpressed lentivirus‐infected cells
    Figure Legend Snippet: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 overcame HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. A, HGF overexpression lentivirus increased the production of HGF in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. The cells were incubated in medium contained lentivirus for 48 h, and culture supernatants were harvested. The level of HGF was determined by ELISA . B, HGF overexpressed PC ‐9 and HCC 827cells increased gefitinib resistance. The PC ‐9/ NC , HCC 827/ NC , PC ‐9/ HGF , HCC 827/ HGF cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib for 72 h. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , * P < .05, ** P < .01 compared with control group. C, miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 mimics transfection reversed HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance. The PC ‐9/ HGF , HCC 827/ HGF cells were transfected with miR‐1‐3p or miR‐206 mimics for 24 h and then treated with increasing concentrations of gefitinib. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , * P < .05, ** P < .01 compared with negative control ( NC ) group. PC ‐9/ NC and HCC 827/ NC cells: negative control lentivirus infected cells; PC ‐9/ HGF and HCC 827/ HGF cells: HGF overexpressed lentivirus‐infected cells

    Techniques Used: Over Expression, Incubation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, MTT Assay, Transfection, Negative Control, Infection

    miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 reversed HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance by c‐Met. A, c‐Met knockdown mimicked the effect of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206. Left, c‐Met knockdown was evaluated by western blot assay in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. Right, PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells with c‐Met knockdown were treated with or without gefitinib (1 μmol/L) in the presence/absence of HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 72 h, cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01. B, Top, c‐Met overexpression was evaluated by Western blot assay in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. Bottom, c‐Met overexpression attenuated the effects of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206. PC ‐9/ HGF and HCC 827/ HGF cells were co‐transfected with c‐Met overexpression plasmid and miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 mimics and then treated with gefitinib (1 μmol/L), cell viability was determined after 48 h of treatment by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01
    Figure Legend Snippet: miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 reversed HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance by c‐Met. A, c‐Met knockdown mimicked the effect of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206. Left, c‐Met knockdown was evaluated by western blot assay in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. Right, PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells with c‐Met knockdown were treated with or without gefitinib (1 μmol/L) in the presence/absence of HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 72 h, cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01. B, Top, c‐Met overexpression was evaluated by Western blot assay in PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells. Bottom, c‐Met overexpression attenuated the effects of miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206. PC ‐9/ HGF and HCC 827/ HGF cells were co‐transfected with c‐Met overexpression plasmid and miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 mimics and then treated with gefitinib (1 μmol/L), cell viability was determined after 48 h of treatment by MTT assay. Data are means of three separated experiments ± SD , ** P < .01

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, MTT Assay, Over Expression, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation

    miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 suppresses c‐Met/Akt and Erk pathway in HGF ‐mediated gefitinib‐resistant cells. miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 inhibited Akt and Erk1/2 signalling, even in HGF treated PC ‐9 (A) and HCC 827 (B) cells. PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells were transfected with miR‐1‐3p or miR‐206 mimics and then treated with gefitinib (1 μmol/L) in the presence/absence of HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 1 h, and cell extracts were prepared and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. GE : gefitinib
    Figure Legend Snippet: miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 suppresses c‐Met/Akt and Erk pathway in HGF ‐mediated gefitinib‐resistant cells. miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 inhibited Akt and Erk1/2 signalling, even in HGF treated PC ‐9 (A) and HCC 827 (B) cells. PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells were transfected with miR‐1‐3p or miR‐206 mimics and then treated with gefitinib (1 μmol/L) in the presence/absence of HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 1 h, and cell extracts were prepared and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. GE : gefitinib

    Techniques Used: Transfection

    miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 inhibits EMT in HGF ‐mediated gefitinib‐resistant cells. A‐B, HGF induced‐transition from epithelial morphology to mesenchymal morphology (A) with increased EMT ‐related molecular markers expression (B). PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells were treated with HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 48 h, the morphology was photoed by fluorescence microscope. EMT ‐related molecular markers were detected by Western blot analysis. C‐D, miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 mimics transfection inhibited HGF ‐induced EMT . PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells were transfected with miR‐1‐3p or miR‐206 mimics and then treated with HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 48 h. The morphology was photoed by fluorescence microscope. EMT ‐related molecular markers expressions were detected by Western blot analysis. E‐F, Immunofluorescence stain of EMT markers of E‐cadherin and Vimentin in PC ‐9/ NC , HCC 827/ NC , PC ‐9/ HGF and HCC 827/ HGF cells transfected with or without miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 mimics. Scale bar: 20 μm
    Figure Legend Snippet: miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 inhibits EMT in HGF ‐mediated gefitinib‐resistant cells. A‐B, HGF induced‐transition from epithelial morphology to mesenchymal morphology (A) with increased EMT ‐related molecular markers expression (B). PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells were treated with HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 48 h, the morphology was photoed by fluorescence microscope. EMT ‐related molecular markers were detected by Western blot analysis. C‐D, miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 mimics transfection inhibited HGF ‐induced EMT . PC ‐9 and HCC 827 cells were transfected with miR‐1‐3p or miR‐206 mimics and then treated with HGF (50 ng/ mL ) for 48 h. The morphology was photoed by fluorescence microscope. EMT ‐related molecular markers expressions were detected by Western blot analysis. E‐F, Immunofluorescence stain of EMT markers of E‐cadherin and Vimentin in PC ‐9/ NC , HCC 827/ NC , PC ‐9/ HGF and HCC 827/ HGF cells transfected with or without miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 mimics. Scale bar: 20 μm

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Western Blot, Transfection, Immunofluorescence, Staining

    miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 inhibits HGF ‐mediated gefitinib resistance in vivo . A‐B, PC ‐9/ NC , and PC ‐9/ HGF cells (10 7 ) were inoculated subcutaneously into nude mice on day 0. Mice received oral gefitinib (25 mg/kg/d) and/or locally injected miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 agomirs, starting on day 10. The tumour size was measured every 3 days, and tumour volumes were calculated as described in . We set three days of stop gefitinib (stop‐ GE ) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment. Error bars indicate standard errors of 3 mice. B, macroscopic appearances of tumours harvested on day 25 are shown. GE :gefitinib
    Figure Legend Snippet: miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 inhibits HGF ‐mediated gefitinib resistance in vivo . A‐B, PC ‐9/ NC , and PC ‐9/ HGF cells (10 7 ) were inoculated subcutaneously into nude mice on day 0. Mice received oral gefitinib (25 mg/kg/d) and/or locally injected miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 agomirs, starting on day 10. The tumour size was measured every 3 days, and tumour volumes were calculated as described in . We set three days of stop gefitinib (stop‐ GE ) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment. Error bars indicate standard errors of 3 mice. B, macroscopic appearances of tumours harvested on day 25 are shown. GE :gefitinib

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, Injection

    Proposed models on the inhibitory role of miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 in HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance. As depicted in the model, miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 overcome HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance by targeting c‐Met‐Akt/Erk pathway and epithelial‐mesenchymal transition ( EMT ) in lung cancer with EGFR activating mutation
    Figure Legend Snippet: Proposed models on the inhibitory role of miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 in HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance. As depicted in the model, miR‐1‐3p/miR‐206 overcome HGF ‐induced gefitinib resistance by targeting c‐Met‐Akt/Erk pathway and epithelial‐mesenchymal transition ( EMT ) in lung cancer with EGFR activating mutation

    Techniques Used: Mutagenesis

    Related Articles

    Expressing:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Incubation:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    MTT Assay:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Control:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Over Expression:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Transfection:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Negative Control:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Infection:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Knockdown:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Western Blot:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Plasmid Preparation:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Fluorescence:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Microscopy:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Immunofluorescence:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Staining:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    In Vivo:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Injection:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Mutagenesis:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Cell Viability Assay:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.

    Xenograft Assay:

    Article Title: miR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 sensitizes HGF ‐induced gefitinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells through inhibition of c‐Met signalling and EMT
    Article Snippet: MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.MiR‐1‐3p and miR‐206 agomirs and their negative control (NC) (2 nmol; Genepharma, Shanghai, China) were given locally by direct injection into the xenografts every 3 days.. In addition, we set 3 days of stop gefitinib (stop‐GE) interval to confirm the effect of gefitinib and combined treatment.. Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.Tumour volumes were determined (in cubic millimetre) by measuring in two directions and were calculated as tumour volume = length × (width) 2 /2.



    Similar Products

    94
    Genesee Scientific virgin female fly
    Virgin Female Fly, supplied by Genesee Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/Droso-Plugs+%2C+Plastic+Bottles/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__10__08__757749-355-4-23
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    virgin female fly - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bio-Rad yeast cellswas performedusing thechef yeast genomic dna plug kit
    Yeast Cellswas Performedusing Thechef Yeast Genomic Dna Plug Kit, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/CHEF+Yeast+Genomic+DNA+Plug+Kit/pm42823428-251-8-18
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yeast cellswas performedusing thechef yeast genomic dna plug kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Oxford Instruments imaris colocalization finder plug in
    Imaris Colocalization Finder Plug In, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/Imaris/pm42815651-125-6-6
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    imaris colocalization finder plug in - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad precision plus protein standard
    Precision Plus Protein Standard, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/Precision+Plus+Protein+Standard+Plugs/pm42815390-77-0-4
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    precision plus protein standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Abbott Laboratories amplatzer ii plug
    Amplatzer Ii Plug, supplied by Abbott Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/amplatzer+ii+plug+vascular/pmc13264216-36-14-17
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    amplatzer ii plug - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    CELLTREAT Scientific plug seal tissue culture flasks
    Plug Seal Tissue Culture Flasks, supplied by CELLTREAT Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/Tissue+Culture+Treated+Flasks/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__08__18__745565-214-37-41
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    plug seal tissue culture flasks - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    St Jude Medical amplatzer vascular plug
    Amplatzer Vascular Plug, supplied by St Jude Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/amplatzer+ii+plug+vascular/pmc13266117-24-9-12
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    amplatzer vascular plug - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad size standard precision plus protein
    Size Standard Precision Plus Protein, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/Precision+Plus+Protein+Standard+Plugs/10__1016_slash_j__foodhyd__2026__113258-101-0-5
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    size standard precision plus protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad precision plus protein all blue standard
    Precision Plus Protein All Blue Standard, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/Precision+Plus+Protein+Standard+Plugs/arxiv__2606__04766-492-7-13
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    precision plus protein all blue standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Abbott Laboratories amplatzer vascular plug
    Under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, the dissection flap was punctured from the true lumen into the false lumen (FL) approximately 2 cm distal to the caudal end of the thoracic stent graft, and a Radifocus guidewire was advanced into the FL (A) . The fenestration was then dilated using an 8 mm × 4 cm balloon catheter (B) . The modified Excluder aortic extender (Ex-cuff) was deployed at the distal level of the thoracic stent graft (C) . Subsequently, a 16-mm <t>Amplatzer</t> Vascular Plug I, preloaded with a 2.2F microcatheter was deployed at the waist of the modified Ex-cuff (D) . The microcatheter was then withdrawn into the plug, and four detachable coils were placed within the plug (E and F) . Angiography revealed persistent perigraft leakage around the Ex-cuff (G) . Therefore, 33% n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) was slowly injected, achieving complete occlusion (H) ( arrowhead , coil-in-plug; arrow , NBCA-Lipiodol). Completion angiography confirmed complete elimination of FL perfusion in the thoracic aortic segment (I) .
    Amplatzer Vascular Plug, supplied by Abbott Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/plug/amplatzer+ii+plug+vascular/pmc13054279-34-3-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    amplatzer vascular plug - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, the dissection flap was punctured from the true lumen into the false lumen (FL) approximately 2 cm distal to the caudal end of the thoracic stent graft, and a Radifocus guidewire was advanced into the FL (A) . The fenestration was then dilated using an 8 mm × 4 cm balloon catheter (B) . The modified Excluder aortic extender (Ex-cuff) was deployed at the distal level of the thoracic stent graft (C) . Subsequently, a 16-mm Amplatzer Vascular Plug I, preloaded with a 2.2F microcatheter was deployed at the waist of the modified Ex-cuff (D) . The microcatheter was then withdrawn into the plug, and four detachable coils were placed within the plug (E and F) . Angiography revealed persistent perigraft leakage around the Ex-cuff (G) . Therefore, 33% n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) was slowly injected, achieving complete occlusion (H) ( arrowhead , coil-in-plug; arrow , NBCA-Lipiodol). Completion angiography confirmed complete elimination of FL perfusion in the thoracic aortic segment (I) .

    Journal: Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques

    Article Title: Black candy-plug technique for a large false lumen in a patient with complicated type B aortic dissection

    doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2026.102212

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, the dissection flap was punctured from the true lumen into the false lumen (FL) approximately 2 cm distal to the caudal end of the thoracic stent graft, and a Radifocus guidewire was advanced into the FL (A) . The fenestration was then dilated using an 8 mm × 4 cm balloon catheter (B) . The modified Excluder aortic extender (Ex-cuff) was deployed at the distal level of the thoracic stent graft (C) . Subsequently, a 16-mm Amplatzer Vascular Plug I, preloaded with a 2.2F microcatheter was deployed at the waist of the modified Ex-cuff (D) . The microcatheter was then withdrawn into the plug, and four detachable coils were placed within the plug (E and F) . Angiography revealed persistent perigraft leakage around the Ex-cuff (G) . Therefore, 33% n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) was slowly injected, achieving complete occlusion (H) ( arrowhead , coil-in-plug; arrow , NBCA-Lipiodol). Completion angiography confirmed complete elimination of FL perfusion in the thoracic aortic segment (I) .

    Article Snippet: Subsequently, a 16-mm Amplatzer Vascular Plug I (Abbott), preloaded with a 2.2F-microcatheter (Coiling Support, HI-LEX Co) was delivered through a 6F guiding catheter (Destination; Terumo Medical Co) and deployed at the waist of the modified Ex-cuff ( , D ).

    Techniques: Dissection, Modification, Injection