Review



ap 5  (Tocris)


Bioz Verified Symbol Tocris is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Tocris manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Tocris ap 5
    Ap 5, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 2093 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor+blocker+cpp/NMDA/pmc10103945-252-27-33
    Average 96 stars, based on 2093 article reviews
    ap 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Recombinant:

    Article Title: In utero exposure to NMDA receptor autoantibodies disrupts hippocampal circuit maturation.
    Article Snippet: .. REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Antibodies Human IgG1 anti-NR1 (clone #003–102) Kreye et al. 49 N/A Human non-reactive IgG1 (clone #mGO53) Wardemann et al. 50 N/A Goat anti-human IgG (H + L) Cross-Absorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 647 Invitrogen Cat#A-21445; RRID: AB_2535862 mouse anti-human IgG (clone MT145) Mabtech RRID: AB_10697677 mouse anti-human IgG-ALP (clone MT78) Mabtech RRID: AB_10697678 Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins DNQX Tocris Bioscience Cat#0189; Cas#2379-57-9 Gabazine (SR 95531 hydrobromide) Tocris Bioscience Cat#1262; Cas#104104-50-9 D-APV Tocris Bioscience Cat#0106; Cas#79055-68-8 DL-APV Tocris Bioscience Cat#0105; Cas#76326-31-3 DL-APV HelloBio Cat#HB0251; Cas#76326-31-3 Nifedipine Sigma-Aldrich Cat#N7634; Cas#21829-25-4 NMDA Tocris Bioscience Cat0114; Cas#6384-92-5 Tetrodotoxin citrate (TTX) Biotrend Cat# ARCD-0640-1; Cas#18660-81-6 Tetrodotoxin citrate (TTX) HelloBio Cat#HB1035; Cas#18660-81-6 Triton X-100 Sigma-Aldrich Cas#9036-19-5 2-methylbutane Merck KGaA Cas#78-78-4 DAPI Sigma-Aldrich Cas#28718-90-3 Fluoromount-G SouthernBiotech Cat#0100-01 Agarose Sigma-Aldrich Cas#9012-36-6 Normal donkey serum (NDS) Merck KGaA Cat#566460 Experimental models: Organisms/strains Mouse line (B6.129S2-Emx1 tm1(cre)Krj /J or Emx1 IREScre ) The Jackson Laboratory RRID: IMSR_JAX:005628 Mouse line (B6;129S6Gt(ROSA)26Sor tm96(CAG- GCaMP6s)Hze /J or GCaMP6s LSL ) The Jackson Laboratory RRID: IMSR_JAX:024106 Mouse line (C57BL/6J) The Jackson Laboratory RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664 Software and algorithms LabChart 8 ADInstruments RRID: SCR_023643 MES 8.3 Femtonics RRID: N/A MESc 3.5 Femtonics RRID: N/A ZEN 3.1 Carl Zeiss AG RRID: N/A pClamp (Clampfit) Molecular Devices RRID: SCR_011323 Patchmaster HEKA Elektronik RRID: SCR_000034 Mini Analysis Program Synaptosoft RRID: SCR_002184 OriginPro OriginLab RRID: SCR_014212 IBM SPSS Statistics IBM RRID: SCR_016479 MATLAB Mathworks RRID: SCR_001622 Fiji fiji.sc/ RRID: SCR_002285 ComDet package in Fiji imagej.net/plugins/spots-colocalization- comdet N/A (Continued on next page) Cell Reports 45, 117022, March 24, 2026 15 ..

    other:

    Article Title: GluN2A-mediated currents and calcium signal in human iPSC-derived neurons.
    Article Snippet: The FASTQ files were aligned to the Gencode hg38 transcriptome with STAR (v.2.7.8a) using the Partek Flow platform.

    Membrane:

    Article Title: GluN2A-mediated currents and calcium signal in human iPSC-derived neurons
    Article Snippet: .. Membrane currents elicited by NMDA (TOCRIS, HB0454) and Glycine (Millipore Sigma, 106-57-0) were recorded at a membrane potential of −60 mV using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique with a List Electronics EPC-7 amplifier. ..

    Patch Clamp:

    Article Title: GluN2A-mediated currents and calcium signal in human iPSC-derived neurons
    Article Snippet: .. Membrane currents elicited by NMDA (TOCRIS, HB0454) and Glycine (Millipore Sigma, 106-57-0) were recorded at a membrane potential of −60 mV using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique with a List Electronics EPC-7 amplifier. ..



    Similar Products

    95
    Bio-Techne corporation nmda receptor blocker
    a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b <t>for</t> <t>AMPA</t> and <t>NMDA</t> receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.
    Nmda Receptor Blocker, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor+blocker+cpp/(R)-CPP/pmc08497507-229-45-36
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nmda receptor blocker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Tocris nmda receptor blocker
    a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b <t>for</t> <t>AMPA</t> and <t>NMDA</t> receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.
    Nmda Receptor Blocker, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor+blocker+cpp/(R)-CPP/pmc08497507-229-45-56
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nmda receptor blocker - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Tocris nmda receptor blocker rs
    a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b <t>for</t> <t>AMPA</t> and <t>NMDA</t> receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.
    Nmda Receptor Blocker Rs, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor+blocker+cpp/(RS)-CPP/pmc04212060-324-27-50
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nmda receptor blocker rs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Doshisha Corporation nmda receptor blocker cpp
    a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b <t>for</t> <t>AMPA</t> and <t>NMDA</t> receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.
    Nmda Receptor Blocker Cpp, supplied by Doshisha Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/nmda+receptor+blocker+cpp/nmda+receptor+blocker+cpp/pm24669503-2-166-154
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nmda receptor blocker cpp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b for AMPA and NMDA receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Graded heterogeneity of metabotropic signaling underlies a continuum of cell-intrinsic temporal responses in unipolar brush cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22893-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b for AMPA and NMDA receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.

    Article Snippet: Sequential drug wash-ins were performed using a computer-controlled solenoid manifold system (ValveLink 8.2, Automate Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, CA) with a flow rate of 1 to 2 mL/min, where indicated, with mGluR1 antagonist (100 µM LY357385, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN), AMPA receptor blocker (5 µM NBQX), NMDA receptor blocker (2 µM R-CPP), mGluR2/3 antagonist (1 µM LY341495, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN) and DGK inhibitor II (100 µM R59949, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO)

    Techniques: Expressing

    a Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (gray) the application of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (gray bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. b Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 5). c Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (red) the application of an mGluR1 antagonist (red bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. d Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of an mGluR1 antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 5). e Example of instantaneous firing rate before and after 20 minutes of DGK inhibitor II wash-in. f Summary of half-decay time of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 6). g Summary of peak amplitude of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 6).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Graded heterogeneity of metabotropic signaling underlies a continuum of cell-intrinsic temporal responses in unipolar brush cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22893-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (gray) the application of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (gray bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. b Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 5). c Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (red) the application of an mGluR1 antagonist (red bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. d Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of an mGluR1 antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 5). e Example of instantaneous firing rate before and after 20 minutes of DGK inhibitor II wash-in. f Summary of half-decay time of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 6). g Summary of peak amplitude of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 6).

    Article Snippet: Sequential drug wash-ins were performed using a computer-controlled solenoid manifold system (ValveLink 8.2, Automate Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, CA) with a flow rate of 1 to 2 mL/min, where indicated, with mGluR1 antagonist (100 µM LY357385, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN), AMPA receptor blocker (5 µM NBQX), NMDA receptor blocker (2 µM R-CPP), mGluR2/3 antagonist (1 µM LY341495, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN) and DGK inhibitor II (100 µM R59949, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO)

    Techniques:

    a Sample cell-attached recording (top) instantaneous firing rate (middle) and synaptic current measured with whole-cell voltage clamp (bottom) in a cell with fast response. b Same as in a but for a cell with intermediate speed response. c Same as in a but for a cell with clear biphasic synaptic current (bottom). d Same as in a but for a cell with slow biphasic response. e Same as in a but for a cell with only a pause in firing. f Half-decay times of firing rates vs. half-decay times of currents and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.91, slope = 0.88, intercept = −0.22, n = 17). g Peak firing rate vs. peak current amplitude and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.69, slope = 0.71, intercept = −0.65, n = 17). h Pause duration vs. amplitude of the current at stimulation offset, and linear fit with log 10 response variable (black, R adj 2 = 0.44, slope = 0.01, intercept = −0.42, n = 20). i Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR1-mediated current ( n = 10). j Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR2/3-mediated current ( n = 7). k Average synaptic response before (black), after (red) mGluR1 antagonist, and after AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist wash-ins (gray). Each trace is an average of 8 trials. l Average synaptic response before (top, black) and after (top, blue) mGluR2/3 antagonist wash-in, and their difference (bottom, black). Each trace is an average of 8 trials.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Graded heterogeneity of metabotropic signaling underlies a continuum of cell-intrinsic temporal responses in unipolar brush cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22893-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Sample cell-attached recording (top) instantaneous firing rate (middle) and synaptic current measured with whole-cell voltage clamp (bottom) in a cell with fast response. b Same as in a but for a cell with intermediate speed response. c Same as in a but for a cell with clear biphasic synaptic current (bottom). d Same as in a but for a cell with slow biphasic response. e Same as in a but for a cell with only a pause in firing. f Half-decay times of firing rates vs. half-decay times of currents and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.91, slope = 0.88, intercept = −0.22, n = 17). g Peak firing rate vs. peak current amplitude and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.69, slope = 0.71, intercept = −0.65, n = 17). h Pause duration vs. amplitude of the current at stimulation offset, and linear fit with log 10 response variable (black, R adj 2 = 0.44, slope = 0.01, intercept = −0.42, n = 20). i Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR1-mediated current ( n = 10). j Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR2/3-mediated current ( n = 7). k Average synaptic response before (black), after (red) mGluR1 antagonist, and after AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist wash-ins (gray). Each trace is an average of 8 trials. l Average synaptic response before (top, black) and after (top, blue) mGluR2/3 antagonist wash-in, and their difference (bottom, black). Each trace is an average of 8 trials.

    Article Snippet: Sequential drug wash-ins were performed using a computer-controlled solenoid manifold system (ValveLink 8.2, Automate Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, CA) with a flow rate of 1 to 2 mL/min, where indicated, with mGluR1 antagonist (100 µM LY357385, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN), AMPA receptor blocker (5 µM NBQX), NMDA receptor blocker (2 µM R-CPP), mGluR2/3 antagonist (1 µM LY341495, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN) and DGK inhibitor II (100 µM R59949, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO)

    Techniques:

    a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b for AMPA and NMDA receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Graded heterogeneity of metabotropic signaling underlies a continuum of cell-intrinsic temporal responses in unipolar brush cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22893-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematics of cerebellar circuit. b UMAP embedding showing normalized expression of gene involved in mGluR1 signaling cascade. c Same as in b for AMPA and NMDA receptors. d Same as in b for genes involved in mGluR2/3 signaling cascade. e Example spiking responses in different UBCs to a burst of MF input (20 stimuli at 100 Hz). f Instantaneous firing rate for the same cells.

    Article Snippet: Sequential drug wash-ins were performed using a computer-controlled solenoid manifold system (ValveLink 8.2, Automate Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, CA) with a flow rate of 1 to 2 mL/min, where indicated, with mGluR1 antagonist (100 μM LY357385, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN), AMPA receptor blocker (5 μM NBQX), NMDA receptor blocker (2 μM R-CPP), mGluR2/3 antagonist (1 μM LY341495, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN) and DGK inhibitor II (100 μM R59949, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO)

    Techniques: Expressing

    a Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (gray) the application of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (gray bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. b Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 5). c Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (red) the application of an mGluR1 antagonist (red bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. d Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of an mGluR1 antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 5). e Example of instantaneous firing rate before and after 20 minutes of DGK inhibitor II wash-in. f Summary of half-decay time of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 6). g Summary of peak amplitude of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 6).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Graded heterogeneity of metabotropic signaling underlies a continuum of cell-intrinsic temporal responses in unipolar brush cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22893-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (gray) the application of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (gray bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. b Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 5). c Examples of instantaneous firing rate from on-cell recordings before (black) and after (red) the application of an mGluR1 antagonist (red bar) in a fast (left) and a slow (right) UBC. Each trace is an average of 8 trials. d Summary of evoked spiking (20 × 100 Hz) and the effect of an mGluR1 antagonist (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 5). e Example of instantaneous firing rate before and after 20 minutes of DGK inhibitor II wash-in. f Summary of half-decay time of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean ± sem, n = 6). g Summary of peak amplitude of instantaneous firing rate response with DGK inhibitor II (normalized to baseline, mean±sem, n = 6).

    Article Snippet: Sequential drug wash-ins were performed using a computer-controlled solenoid manifold system (ValveLink 8.2, Automate Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, CA) with a flow rate of 1 to 2 mL/min, where indicated, with mGluR1 antagonist (100 μM LY357385, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN), AMPA receptor blocker (5 μM NBQX), NMDA receptor blocker (2 μM R-CPP), mGluR2/3 antagonist (1 μM LY341495, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN) and DGK inhibitor II (100 μM R59949, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO)

    Techniques:

    a Sample cell-attached recording (top) instantaneous firing rate (middle) and synaptic current measured with whole-cell voltage clamp (bottom) in a cell with fast response. b Same as in a but for a cell with intermediate speed response. c Same as in a but for a cell with clear biphasic synaptic current (bottom). d Same as in a but for a cell with slow biphasic response. e Same as in a but for a cell with only a pause in firing. f Half-decay times of firing rates vs. half-decay times of currents and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.91, slope = 0.88, intercept = −0.22, n = 17). g Peak firing rate vs. peak current amplitude and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.69, slope = 0.71, intercept = −0.65, n = 17). h Pause duration vs. amplitude of the current at stimulation offset, and linear fit with log 10 response variable (black, R adj 2 = 0.44, slope = 0.01, intercept = −0.42, n = 20). i Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR1-mediated current ( n = 10). j Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR2/3-mediated current ( n = 7). k Average synaptic response before (black), after (red) mGluR1 antagonist, and after AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist wash-ins (gray). Each trace is an average of 8 trials. l Average synaptic response before (top, black) and after (top, blue) mGluR2/3 antagonist wash-in, and their difference (bottom, black). Each trace is an average of 8 trials.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Graded heterogeneity of metabotropic signaling underlies a continuum of cell-intrinsic temporal responses in unipolar brush cells

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22893-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Sample cell-attached recording (top) instantaneous firing rate (middle) and synaptic current measured with whole-cell voltage clamp (bottom) in a cell with fast response. b Same as in a but for a cell with intermediate speed response. c Same as in a but for a cell with clear biphasic synaptic current (bottom). d Same as in a but for a cell with slow biphasic response. e Same as in a but for a cell with only a pause in firing. f Half-decay times of firing rates vs. half-decay times of currents and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.91, slope = 0.88, intercept = −0.22, n = 17). g Peak firing rate vs. peak current amplitude and linear fit on a log-log plot ( R adj 2 = 0.69, slope = 0.71, intercept = −0.65, n = 17). h Pause duration vs. amplitude of the current at stimulation offset, and linear fit with log 10 response variable (black, R adj 2 = 0.44, slope = 0.01, intercept = −0.42, n = 20). i Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR1-mediated current ( n = 10). j Heatmap of peak normalized mGluR2/3-mediated current ( n = 7). k Average synaptic response before (black), after (red) mGluR1 antagonist, and after AMPA/NMDA receptor antagonist wash-ins (gray). Each trace is an average of 8 trials. l Average synaptic response before (top, black) and after (top, blue) mGluR2/3 antagonist wash-in, and their difference (bottom, black). Each trace is an average of 8 trials.

    Article Snippet: Sequential drug wash-ins were performed using a computer-controlled solenoid manifold system (ValveLink 8.2, Automate Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, CA) with a flow rate of 1 to 2 mL/min, where indicated, with mGluR1 antagonist (100 μM LY357385, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN), AMPA receptor blocker (5 μM NBQX), NMDA receptor blocker (2 μM R-CPP), mGluR2/3 antagonist (1 μM LY341495, Tocris Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN) and DGK inhibitor II (100 μM R59949, MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, MO)

    Techniques: