3d x-ray microscopy data analysis (GraphPad Software Inc)

GraphPad Software Inc is a verified supplier

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

GraphPad Software Inc 3d x-ray microscopy data analysis

Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

3d X Ray Microscopy Data Analysis, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microscopy+image+analysis+software/3d+x+ray+microscopy+data+analysis/pmc10875706-173-0-7
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews

3d x-ray microscopy data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11

90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response"

Article Title: Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response

Journal: Hearing research

doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108597

Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. 3D X-ray microscopy images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

Figure Legend Snippet: Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. 3D X-ray microscopy images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

Techniques Used: Microscopy, In Situ, Standard Deviation

Microscopy:

Article Title: Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response
Article Snippet: 3D X-ray microscopy data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism software (Graph-Pad Software, USA) via ordinary one-way ANOVA.

Review

3d x-ray microscopy data analysis (GraphPad Software Inc)

Structured Review

Images

1) Product Images from "Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response"

Related Articles

Microscopy:

Software:

In Situ:

Standard Deviation:

Similar Products

Image Search Results