human circrna v2.0 microarray (Arraystar inc)

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

Arraystar inc human circrna v2.0 microarray

<t>CircRNA</t> <t>microarray</t> and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Human Circrna V2.0 Microarray, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/microarray+hybridization+solution+version+2/pmc07989709-2-18-17?v=Arraystar+inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews

human circrna v2.0 microarray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08

90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Androgen receptor decreases the renal cell carcinoma bone metastases via suppressing the osteolytic formation through altering a novel circEXOC7 regulatory axis"

Article Title: Androgen receptor decreases the renal cell carcinoma bone metastases via suppressing the osteolytic formation through altering a novel circEXOC7 regulatory axis

Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

doi: 10.1002/ctm2.353

CircRNA microarray and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Figure Legend Snippet: CircRNA microarray and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Techniques Used: Microarray, Expressing, Generated, Quantitative RT-PCR, Blocking Assay, Quantitation Assay

The expression of circEXOC7 is regulated by DHX9. (A) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cell lines to show correlation between AR and four genes related to circRNA biogenesis. Among them, ADAR2 and DHX9 have a positive correlation with AR mRNA expression. (B and C) The qRT‐qPCR was performed to show (B) knocking down DHX9, and not (C) ADAR2 gene, led to increased circEXOC7 expression in SW839 cells. (D) WB was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cells to show that modulated AR expression also altered DHX9 expression. (E) Predicted AR binding sites on the DHX9 promoter region using website http://jaspar.genereg.net/ . (F) ChIP assay showing AR could bind to the No. 2 potential ARE on the DHX9 5′‐promoter region. (G) The wild type and mutant pGL3‐DHX9 promoter reporter constructs. (H and I) Luciferase activity after transfection of wild type or mutant DHX9 promoter reporter constructs in OS‐RC‐2 cells (H) transfected with AR‐cDNA or pWPI and SW839 cells (I) transfected with AR‐shRNA or pLKO. For (B and C), (H and I), data are presented as Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Figure Legend Snippet: The expression of circEXOC7 is regulated by DHX9. (A) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cell lines to show correlation between AR and four genes related to circRNA biogenesis. Among them, ADAR2 and DHX9 have a positive correlation with AR mRNA expression. (B and C) The qRT‐qPCR was performed to show (B) knocking down DHX9, and not (C) ADAR2 gene, led to increased circEXOC7 expression in SW839 cells. (D) WB was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cells to show that modulated AR expression also altered DHX9 expression. (E) Predicted AR binding sites on the DHX9 promoter region using website http://jaspar.genereg.net/ . (F) ChIP assay showing AR could bind to the No. 2 potential ARE on the DHX9 5′‐promoter region. (G) The wild type and mutant pGL3‐DHX9 promoter reporter constructs. (H and I) Luciferase activity after transfection of wild type or mutant DHX9 promoter reporter constructs in OS‐RC‐2 cells (H) transfected with AR‐cDNA or pWPI and SW839 cells (I) transfected with AR‐shRNA or pLKO. For (B and C), (H and I), data are presented as Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Techniques Used: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Binding Assay, Mutagenesis, Construct, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, shRNA

Review

human circrna v2.0 microarray (Arraystar inc)

Structured Review

Images

1) Product Images from "Androgen receptor decreases the renal cell carcinoma bone metastases via suppressing the osteolytic formation through altering a novel circEXOC7 regulatory axis"

Similar Products

Image Search Results