animated simulation modeling software program medmodel 4.1 (ProModel Corporation)
90
Structured Review
ProModel Corporation
animated simulation modeling software program medmodel 4.1
Animated Simulation Modeling Software Program Medmodel 4.1, supplied by ProModel Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/medmodel+simulation+software/animated+simulation+modeling+software+program+medmodel+4+1/pm11526251-101-13-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Animated Simulation Modeling Software Program Medmodel 4.1, supplied by ProModel Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/medmodel+simulation+software/animated+simulation+modeling+software+program+medmodel+4+1/pm11526251-101-13-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
animated simulation modeling software program medmodel 4.1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Activity Assay:Article Title: Resource cost analysis of cervical spine trauma radiography. Article Snippet: 1 From the Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359728, Seattle, WA 981048560 (C.C.B.); the Departments of Radiology (C.C.B.) and Health Policy and Administration (W.N.Z.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and the Department of Management Services, University of North Carolina Health Care System, Chapel Hill (N.D.G.).. Received August 25, 2000; revision requested October 5; revision received March 9, 2001; accepted March 16.. C.C.B. received funding for this study as a GERRAF Fellow. Software:Article Title: Resource cost analysis of cervical spine trauma radiography. Article Snippet: 1 From the Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359728, Seattle, WA 981048560 (C.C.B.); the Departments of Radiology (C.C.B.) and Health Policy and Administration (W.N.Z.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and the Department of Management Services, University of North Carolina Health Care System, Chapel Hill (N.D.G.).. Received August 25, 2000; revision requested October 5; revision received March 9, 2001; accepted March 16.. C.C.B. received funding for this study as a GERRAF Fellow. |