scatterplot smoothing (STATA Corporation)
Structured Review

Scatterplot Smoothing, supplied by STATA Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 36840 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/linear+locally+weighted+scatterplot+smoother+(lowess)+method/STATA+12%2E0/pmc06501022-111-32-35
Average 99 stars, based on 36840 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Effect of lymph node examined count on accurate staging and survival of resected esophageal cancer"
Article Title: Effect of lymph node examined count on accurate staging and survival of resected esophageal cancer
Journal: Thoracic Cancer
doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13056
Figure Legend Snippet: Co‐plot of odds ratios (ORs, upper row) and Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing curves of stage migration and determination of structural break points with the use of the Chow test (bottom row). The fitting bandwidth was 0.6. Each dot in the co‐plot represents an OR of a specific lymph node examined (LNE, vacant if case number < 10) from logistic regression analysis. ( a ) Overall patients, ( b ) adenocarcinoma patients, and ( c ) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database; and ( d ) ESCC patients from the Thoracic Surgery Department of a single institution (SI). ( ) T1, ( ) T2, ( ) T3, and ( ) T4.
Techniques Used: Migration
Figure Legend Snippet: Co‐plot of hazard ratios (HRs, upper row) and Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing curves of cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and determination of structural break points with use of the Chow test (bottom row). The fitting bandwidth was 0.6. Each dot in the co‐plot represents an HR of a specific lymph node examined (LNE, vacant if case number < 10) from Cox regression analysis. ( a ) Overall patients, ( b ) adenocarcinoma patients, and ( c ) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. ( ) T1, ( ) T2, ( ) T3, and ( ) T4.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Co‐plot of hazard ratios (HRs, upper row) and Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing curves of cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and determination of structural break points with the use of the Chow test (bottom row). The fitting bandwidth was 0.6. Each dot in the co‐plot represents an HR of a specific lymph node examined (LNE, vacant if case number < 10) from Cox regression analysis. ( a ) Node‐negative (N negative) and ( b ) node‐positive (N positive) patients. ( ) T1, ( ) T2, ( ) T3, and ( ) T4.
Techniques Used:
