Review





Similar Products

resting 12 lead surface ecg  (Philips Healthcare)
86
Philips Healthcare resting 12 lead surface ecg
Resting 12 Lead Surface Ecg, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pmc12786989-122-1-6?v=Philips+Healthcare
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
resting 12 lead surface ecg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
monitoring • 12 lead surface electrocardiogram  (Philips Healthcare)
86
Philips Healthcare monitoring • 12 lead surface electrocardiogram
Monitoring • 12 Lead Surface Electrocardiogram, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pm41342816-169-25-30?v=Philips+Healthcare
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monitoring • 12 lead surface electrocardiogram - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lead surface ecg  (Philips Healthcare)
86
Philips Healthcare lead surface ecg
Lead Surface Ecg, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pm41084955-48-3-13?v=Philips+Healthcare
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lead surface ecg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
standard 12 lead surface digital ecgs  (Fukuda Denshi Co)
86
Fukuda Denshi Co standard 12 lead surface digital ecgs
Standard 12 Lead Surface Digital Ecgs, supplied by Fukuda Denshi Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pmc12328242-138-5-37?v=Fukuda+Denshi+Co
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard 12 lead surface digital ecgs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
surface 12 lead ecg p waves  (Boston Scientific Corporation)
86
Boston Scientific Corporation surface 12 lead ecg p waves
Surface 12 Lead Ecg P Waves, supplied by Boston Scientific Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pm39880539-50-0-23?v=Boston+Scientific+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
surface 12 lead ecg p waves - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lead surface ecg  (Roche)
86
Roche lead surface ecg
Lead Surface Ecg, supplied by Roche, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pm38329882-49-8-39?v=Roche
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lead surface ecg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
single lead body surface ecg signals  (ADInstruments)
98
ADInstruments single lead body surface ecg signals
Respiratory rate (RR) estimation in spontaneously breathing humans. ( A ) RR estimates, in breaths per minute (bpm), during 3 levels of exercise in one subject. Algorithm-estimated RRs (estimated, blue) are compared with RR measured from the subject using the respiratory inductive plethysmography based Hexoskin monitor (expected, red) while performing three consecutive tasks: (1) resting, standing upright on a treadmill (Int 1); (2) walking on the treadmill at a moderate speed (1.2 m/s) (int 2); and (3) walking on the treadmill with 15% track inclination at the moderate speed (Int 3). ( B ) Summary results of algorithm-estimated and reference RRs (blue and red, respectively) during each subject-task interval. The data are from seven subjects, each performing either or all the three levels of exercise described above (subject-tasks), and presented in order of increasing average expected RR values. ( C ) The absolute errors (black) and relative errors (gray) of the algorithmic RR estimations across the subject-task intervals described above. Equivalence testing revealed that the expected and estimated RRs were the same ( p < 0.0001) for all subject-task intervals. ( D ) A comparison of the <t>ECG</t> cycle-to-cycle estimated and expected RR for all subjects and tasks with the indicated R 2 value (0.9092) and low root mean square error (RMSE, 2.2bpm) support a close linear relationship between the values. ( E ) Absolute error (bpm) and ( F ) relative error (%) distributions across all subjects.
Single Lead Body Surface Ecg Signals, supplied by ADInstruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pmc10762020-207-0-18?v=ADInstruments
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
single lead body surface ecg signals - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ecg)  (PRUCKA ENGINEERING INC)
90
PRUCKA ENGINEERING INC 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ecg)
Respiratory rate (RR) estimation in spontaneously breathing humans. ( A ) RR estimates, in breaths per minute (bpm), during 3 levels of exercise in one subject. Algorithm-estimated RRs (estimated, blue) are compared with RR measured from the subject using the respiratory inductive plethysmography based Hexoskin monitor (expected, red) while performing three consecutive tasks: (1) resting, standing upright on a treadmill (Int 1); (2) walking on the treadmill at a moderate speed (1.2 m/s) (int 2); and (3) walking on the treadmill with 15% track inclination at the moderate speed (Int 3). ( B ) Summary results of algorithm-estimated and reference RRs (blue and red, respectively) during each subject-task interval. The data are from seven subjects, each performing either or all the three levels of exercise described above (subject-tasks), and presented in order of increasing average expected RR values. ( C ) The absolute errors (black) and relative errors (gray) of the algorithmic RR estimations across the subject-task intervals described above. Equivalence testing revealed that the expected and estimated RRs were the same ( p < 0.0001) for all subject-task intervals. ( D ) A comparison of the <t>ECG</t> cycle-to-cycle estimated and expected RR for all subjects and tasks with the indicated R 2 value (0.9092) and low root mean square error (RMSE, 2.2bpm) support a close linear relationship between the values. ( E ) Absolute error (bpm) and ( F ) relative error (%) distributions across all subjects.
12 Lead Surface Electrocardiogram (Ecg), supplied by PRUCKA ENGINEERING INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pm38151978-38-11-20?v=PRUCKA+ENGINEERING+INC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ecg) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
surface rhythm strips (1-lead ecg)  (Boston Scientific Corporation)
90
Boston Scientific Corporation surface rhythm strips (1-lead ecg)
Respiratory rate (RR) estimation in spontaneously breathing humans. ( A ) RR estimates, in breaths per minute (bpm), during 3 levels of exercise in one subject. Algorithm-estimated RRs (estimated, blue) are compared with RR measured from the subject using the respiratory inductive plethysmography based Hexoskin monitor (expected, red) while performing three consecutive tasks: (1) resting, standing upright on a treadmill (Int 1); (2) walking on the treadmill at a moderate speed (1.2 m/s) (int 2); and (3) walking on the treadmill with 15% track inclination at the moderate speed (Int 3). ( B ) Summary results of algorithm-estimated and reference RRs (blue and red, respectively) during each subject-task interval. The data are from seven subjects, each performing either or all the three levels of exercise described above (subject-tasks), and presented in order of increasing average expected RR values. ( C ) The absolute errors (black) and relative errors (gray) of the algorithmic RR estimations across the subject-task intervals described above. Equivalence testing revealed that the expected and estimated RRs were the same ( p < 0.0001) for all subject-task intervals. ( D ) A comparison of the <t>ECG</t> cycle-to-cycle estimated and expected RR for all subjects and tasks with the indicated R 2 value (0.9092) and low root mean square error (RMSE, 2.2bpm) support a close linear relationship between the values. ( E ) Absolute error (bpm) and ( F ) relative error (%) distributions across all subjects.
Surface Rhythm Strips (1 Lead Ecg), supplied by Boston Scientific Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lead+surface+ecg/pmc10779836-72-3-21?v=Boston+Scientific+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
surface rhythm strips (1-lead ecg) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Respiratory rate (RR) estimation in spontaneously breathing humans. ( A ) RR estimates, in breaths per minute (bpm), during 3 levels of exercise in one subject. Algorithm-estimated RRs (estimated, blue) are compared with RR measured from the subject using the respiratory inductive plethysmography based Hexoskin monitor (expected, red) while performing three consecutive tasks: (1) resting, standing upright on a treadmill (Int 1); (2) walking on the treadmill at a moderate speed (1.2 m/s) (int 2); and (3) walking on the treadmill with 15% track inclination at the moderate speed (Int 3). ( B ) Summary results of algorithm-estimated and reference RRs (blue and red, respectively) during each subject-task interval. The data are from seven subjects, each performing either or all the three levels of exercise described above (subject-tasks), and presented in order of increasing average expected RR values. ( C ) The absolute errors (black) and relative errors (gray) of the algorithmic RR estimations across the subject-task intervals described above. Equivalence testing revealed that the expected and estimated RRs were the same ( p < 0.0001) for all subject-task intervals. ( D ) A comparison of the ECG cycle-to-cycle estimated and expected RR for all subjects and tasks with the indicated R 2 value (0.9092) and low root mean square error (RMSE, 2.2bpm) support a close linear relationship between the values. ( E ) Absolute error (bpm) and ( F ) relative error (%) distributions across all subjects.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Open-source software for respiratory rate estimation using single-lead electrocardiograms

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50470-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Respiratory rate (RR) estimation in spontaneously breathing humans. ( A ) RR estimates, in breaths per minute (bpm), during 3 levels of exercise in one subject. Algorithm-estimated RRs (estimated, blue) are compared with RR measured from the subject using the respiratory inductive plethysmography based Hexoskin monitor (expected, red) while performing three consecutive tasks: (1) resting, standing upright on a treadmill (Int 1); (2) walking on the treadmill at a moderate speed (1.2 m/s) (int 2); and (3) walking on the treadmill with 15% track inclination at the moderate speed (Int 3). ( B ) Summary results of algorithm-estimated and reference RRs (blue and red, respectively) during each subject-task interval. The data are from seven subjects, each performing either or all the three levels of exercise described above (subject-tasks), and presented in order of increasing average expected RR values. ( C ) The absolute errors (black) and relative errors (gray) of the algorithmic RR estimations across the subject-task intervals described above. Equivalence testing revealed that the expected and estimated RRs were the same ( p < 0.0001) for all subject-task intervals. ( D ) A comparison of the ECG cycle-to-cycle estimated and expected RR for all subjects and tasks with the indicated R 2 value (0.9092) and low root mean square error (RMSE, 2.2bpm) support a close linear relationship between the values. ( E ) Absolute error (bpm) and ( F ) relative error (%) distributions across all subjects.

Article Snippet: Single-lead body surface ECG signals were obtained during the procedure and 90 min after coil placement using the AD Instruments PowerLab 4/35 system with Labchart 8 software.

Techniques: Comparison

Block diagram of respiration rate estimation algorithm. Raw single-lead ECG data are filtered (panels a and b ), R-peaks are detected (red symbols, panel c ), R-peak intervals are determined, QRS complexes are extracted (panel d ) and their root mean square amplitude (RMS) values are calculated (panel e ), a power spectrum is generated for a moving window of 16 QRS RMS values incremented one value at a time (panel f ), and its peak frequency and the R-peak interval data within the window are used to calculate the respiratory rate (RR) using the equation shown.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Open-source software for respiratory rate estimation using single-lead electrocardiograms

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50470-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: Block diagram of respiration rate estimation algorithm. Raw single-lead ECG data are filtered (panels a and b ), R-peaks are detected (red symbols, panel c ), R-peak intervals are determined, QRS complexes are extracted (panel d ) and their root mean square amplitude (RMS) values are calculated (panel e ), a power spectrum is generated for a moving window of 16 QRS RMS values incremented one value at a time (panel f ), and its peak frequency and the R-peak interval data within the window are used to calculate the respiratory rate (RR) using the equation shown.

Article Snippet: Single-lead body surface ECG signals were obtained during the procedure and 90 min after coil placement using the AD Instruments PowerLab 4/35 system with Labchart 8 software.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Generated