simple kernel density estimator (Statistical Sciences Inc)
Structured Review
Simple Kernel Density Estimator, supplied by Statistical Sciences Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/kernel+density+estimation+analysis/simple+kernel+density+estimator/10__2307_slash_3147159-100-31-48
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods Article Snippet: INTERVAL [0.81-.96] MEDIAN = .75 N = 616z u 0.4- 0.2- 0.0- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 RATIO OF CONTINGENT VALUATION TO REVEALED PREFERENCE STIMATE FIGURE 1 COMPLETE DATASET: NONPARAMETRIC DENSITY ESTIMATE simple kernel density estimator first proposed by |
![Intraoperative direct electrical stimulation sites . All stimulation sites for Patients 1–6 ( A – F ) are visualized on a 3D reconstruction of the anterior bank of their central sulcus and combined on the International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) 152 central sulcus template ( G ). Effector-specific sites are displayed in blue, while inter-effector sites [somato-cognitive action network (SCAN)] are displayed in red. H displays the spatial relationship between the inter-effector sites and the plis de passage (PDP) Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates ( top ) and their <t>probability</t> <t>density</t> <t>estimation</t> ( bottom ). The three coloured circles in the top image represent the same PDP sites as in . ( I ) Box plot showing the probability of overlap between stimulation sites [inter-effector (red) versus single-effector (blue)] for the two subsectors (anterior, posterior) of area 4. Mann–Whitney U-test; not significant, ns: P ≥ 0.05.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_3987/pmc12073987/pmc12073987__awaf022f3.jpg)
