iscript reverse transcriptase supermix cdna for qrt–pcr kit (bio‐rad) (Bio-Rad)
Structured Review

Iscript Reverse Transcriptase Supermix Cdna For Qrt–Pcr Kit (Bio‐Rad), supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/iscript+supermix+reverse+transcriptase+kit/pmc07271653-282-51-53?v=Bio-Rad
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Prostate cancer cell‐intrinsic interferon signaling regulates dormancy and metastatic outgrowth in bone"
Article Title: Prostate cancer cell‐intrinsic interferon signaling regulates dormancy and metastatic outgrowth in bone
Journal: EMBO Reports
doi: 10.15252/embr.202050162
Figure Legend Snippet: A–C Bulk RNA‐seq analysis of DE genes (DEG) significantly suppressed (FDR < 0.05; generalized linear model extraction (GLM) by edgeR) in proliferating RM1 bone‐derived (BD) cells compared to parental RM1 and lung metastases. Tumor‐intrinsic type I IFN signaling is suppressed in proliferating bone lesions ( n = 1) compared to parental RM1 ( n = 2) cells as shown by (A) camera analysis of Hallmark gene set responses associated with bone metastasis (bar length is the –log 10 FDR, false discovery rate). Color indicates mean log 2 fold change (FC) of all genes in gene set. Bar width is relative gene set size. Dashed line shows FDR = 0.05; (B) barcode plot showing enrichment of the Hallmark IFN‐α response gene set in genes suppressed in bone metastases, using the signed log‐likelihood ratio statistic (EdgeR). Bars indicate value of the statistic for each gene in the gene set; (C) log 2 FC values of key downregulated IRGs, with genes retained in dormant cells and classical downstream IFN signaling targets indicated. Altered IRGs directly involved in IFN‐α/β production (light blue) compared to downstream IFN targets (dark blue) are segregated. P ‐values represented as * < 0.05, ** < .005, and *** < 0.0005; GLM by edgeR. D Schematic of proliferating RM1 cell isolation from bone and lung metastases following IC injection for preliminary RNA‐seq and orthogonal validation by qRT–PCR. E Heatmap of mean normalized voom expression of IRGs suppressed in RM1 bone metastases ( n = 1) compared to lung metastases ( n = 1) and parental cells ( n = 2). F qRT–PCR validation of Irf7 and Irf9 downregulation in RM1 cells from bone metastases (RMI BD) compared to parental RM1 cells, lung metastases (RM1 lung), and naïve bone marrow (BM) ( n = 3 mice per group). P ‐values represented as ** < 0.005, and *** < 0.0005 (Student's t ‐test). G qRT–PCR of Irf7 and Irf9 downregulation in parental RM1 cells and RM1 cells from bone metastases (RM1 BD) in WT and Ifnar1 ‐deficient (−/−) mice, with naïve BM from WT and Ifnar −/− animals for reference. ( n = 3 mice per group, n = 1 for Ifnar −/− BM control). P ‐values were represented as * < 0.05 and ** < 0.005 (Student's t ‐test). Data information: All error bars ± SEM. Source data are available online for this figure.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing Assay, Derivative Assay, Cell Isolation, Injection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Stability of Irf7 and Irf9 mRNA suppression by qRT–PCR in ex vivo bone‐derived cells (RM1 BD Irf − , n = 7) in culture compared to a bone‐derived line that showed initial loss during early passage (RM1 BD REV (EP), n = 3), then reverted to parental expression levels at late passage (RM1 BD REV (LP), n = 4) compared to parental RM1 ( n = 3). ELISA of IFN‐α production by RM1 parental ( n = 3), RM1 bone‐derived Irf‐low (RM1 BD Irf − , n = 4), and RM1 BD REV ( n = 3) cells subsequent to poly I:C stimulation. qRT–PCR analysis of Irf7 and Irf9 expression in RM1 BD Irf − cells ± 48 h treatment with MS275 (1 μM) ( n = 7–9). Schematic of contact and transwell co‐culture systems. qRT–PCR analysis of Irf7 and Irf9 expression in parental RM1 cells ( n = 4) 48 h post‐contact culture with naïve BM ( n = 6). qRT–PCR analysis of Irf9 expression in parental RM1 cells ± 48 h co‐culture with naïve BM under contact (non‐transwell; NT) and transwell (0.4‐μm filters that prevent cell contact) conditions ( n = 6–8 per condition). qRT–PCR analysis of Irf9 expression in parental RM1 cells ± 48 h contact co‐culture with naïve BM ± MS275 (1 μM) ( n = 3–6 per condition). Data information: P ‐values represented as * < 0.05, ** < 0.005, and *** < 0.0005 (Student's t ‐test). All error bars ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Ex Vivo, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Co-Culture Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Assessment of tumor‐intrinsic IFN suppression stability over passage (P; number indicated) in culture by qRT–PCR analysis of mean Irf7 and Irf9 mRNA expression in bone‐derived RM1 Irf‐low (RM1 BD Irf − ) cells and a reverted (REV) bone‐derived cell line compared to RM1 parental cells. Values are means ± SEM of three independent experiments. HDACi impact on RM1 BD Irf − proliferation over time by SRB assay. Mean OD at 550 nm ( n = 3). Flow cytometry characterization of bone marrow lymphocyte (%) populations ( n = 3). qRT–PCR of Irf9 expression in parental RM1 cells 48, 72, and 96 h post‐contact co‐culture with FACS‐isolated naïve CD11b + Ly6G + BM cells ( n = 3 mice per time point). qRT–PCR of Irf7 expression in RM1 parental cells ± co‐culture with naïve BM ± 48 h treatment with MS275 ( n = 3–6). P ‐values represented as * < 0.05, ** < 0.005, and *** < 0.0005 (Student's t‐ test). All error bars ± SEM.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Derivative Assay, Sulforhodamine B Assay, Flow Cytometry, Co-Culture Assay, Isolation
