human recombinant c5a protein (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Human Recombinant C5a Protein, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 25 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+complement+component+c5a/pmc08304261-60-25-29?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 25 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Endothelial Progenitor Cells Protect Human Glomerular Endothelial Cells and Podocytes from Complement- and Cytokine-Mediated Injury"
Article Title: Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Endothelial Progenitor Cells Protect Human Glomerular Endothelial Cells and Podocytes from Complement- and Cytokine-Mediated Injury
Journal: Cells
doi: 10.3390/cells10071675
Figure Legend Snippet: Time- and dose-dependent cytotoxicity and apoptosis assays on Glomerular Endothelial Cells (GECs) and Podocytes. GECs. Time-dependent XTT citotoxity assay on GECs ( A ) and podocytes ( B ) incubated with a medium containing CK (20 ng/mL TNF-α, 2.5 ng/mL IL-6, and 50 ng/mL human recombinant C5a protein) or vehicle alone at different time-points (12, 18, 24, 36, 48 h) Significant differences in viability were observed on both GECs and podocytes at 18, 24, 36, and 48 h (* p < 0.05, CK vs. vehicle). At 12 h, only the GECs (A) had different viability between treated (CK) and control cells (vehicle, * p < 0.05, CK vs. vehicle). Cytotoxicity tests by XTT ( C ) and apoptosis by TUNEL assay ( D ), evaluating the protective dose of EPC-derived EVs on GECs (black columns) and podocytes (white columns) after 24 h. Incubation with CK alone was effective in inducing cytotoxic (C) and apoptotic damage (D) in both cell types (* p < 0.05, CK vs. vehicle). Adding 1 or 10 μg/mL EPC-derived EVs to cells incubated with CK did not significantly reduce cell damage (* p < 0.05, CK + 1 μg/mL EV and CK + 10 μg/mL EV vs. vehicle), except with GEC incubated with 10 μg/mL EV in TUNEL assay (§ CK + 10 μg/mL EV vs. CK). In contrast, the adding of 25 or 50 μg/mL EPC-derived EVs to cells incubated with CK significantly reduced cell damage at the level of GECs and podocytes (§ p < 0.05, CK + 25 μg/mL EV and CK + 50 μg/mL EV vs. CK). XTT assays are reported as average optical density (O.D.) intensity ± 1SD. For TUNEL assays, data are expressed as the average number of green fluorescent apoptotic cells ± 1 SD. We performed three experiments for each test and the statistical analysis by ANOVA with Newmann–Keuls multiple comparison test.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Recombinant, Control, TUNEL Assay, Derivative Assay, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: EPC-derived EVs protected GECs from complement- and cytokine-induced damage ( A , B ). Graphs showing GEC cytotoxicity by XTT assay ( A ) and apoptosis by TUNEL assay ( B ). For XTT assays, data are expressed as average OD intensity ± 1 SD, whereas we expressed TUNEL assays data as the average number of green fluorescent apoptotic cells ± 1 SD. We performed three experiments with similar results for all the assays and the statistical analysis by ANOVA with Newmann–Keuls multiple comparison test and Student’s t -test. ( C , D ) FACS analysis ( C ) and representative micrographs ( D ) of ROS expression of GEC (green staining) by confocal microscopy studies (magnification ×400, scale bar 50 μm). Nuclei were counterstained in blue by 2.5 μg/mL Hoechst. We performed three experiments with similar results for all the assays, and we performed the statistical analysis by ANOVA with Newmann–Keuls multiple comparison test and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Incubation with cytokines 20 ng/mL TNF -α, 2.5 ng/mL IL-6, plus 50 ng/mL human recombinant C5a protein CKs significantly increased GEC vitality ( A ), inhibited resistance to apoptosis ( B ), and increased oxidative stress (C) in comparison to treatment with vehicle alone (vehicle, * p < 0.05 CK vs. vehicle). EV stimulation significantly inhibited these effects (§ p < 0.05 CK + EV vs. CK), but not EV were pre-treated with 1 U/mL RNase (# p < 0.05 CK + EV RNase vs. CK + EV).
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, XTT Assay, TUNEL Assay, Comparison, Expressing, Staining, Confocal Microscopy, Incubation, Recombinant



