software multicell gui version 2.4 (MultiCell Technologies)
Structured Review
Software Multicell Gui Version 2.4, supplied by MultiCell Technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gui+software/software+multicell+gui+version+2+4/pmc08321312-59-35-34
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
Imaging:Article Title: Validation of Image Qualities of a Novel Four-Mice Bed PET System as an Oncological and Neurological Analysis Tool Article Snippet: While imaging, we controlled the internal bed temperature using an air pump (MultiCellTM controlled Large pump, Budapest, Hungary) provided by the manufacturer and monitored the body temperature of the animals in real-time using software ( Software:Article Title: Validation of Image Qualities of a Novel Four-Mice Bed PET System as an Oncological and Neurological Analysis Tool Article Snippet: While imaging, we controlled the internal bed temperature using an air pump (MultiCellTM controlled Large pump, Budapest, Hungary) provided by the manufacturer and monitored the body temperature of the animals in real-time using software ( |
![a, b . Epifluorescence-based widefield imaging of CD8 + T-cells interacting with a monolayer of Lo U-2 OS WT (a) and Lo U-2 OS ICAM-1 (b) cells presenting N-Med ImmTACs. White arrowheads indicate the first detectable close-contacts marked by accumulation of fluorescent CD58-HaloTag expressed by the U-2 OS cells. Images are displayed as maximum-intensity projections. Scale bars, 5 µm. c . Fraction of CD8 + T-cells forming close contacts with N-Med ImmTAC-presenting U-2 OS cells after 5’ (n=3 videos). Error bars show SD. Data were compared using a Welch t test. d . Killing of U-2 OS cells by CD8 + T-cells over time measured using <t>Incucyte</t> imaging. Killing assays were performed using CD8 + T-cells from three donors, in triplicate. Error bars show SEM. Data for Lo U-2 OS WT and Lo U-2 OS ICAM-1 cells at selected time points (t = 3, 6, 9 h) were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. e . N-Med EC 50 values measured in co-cultures of CD8 + T-cells with U-2 OS WT and U-2 OS ICAM-1 cells. EC 50 values were determined as in Fig. 1; see also Fig. S4. Error bars correspond to the 95% CI. EC 50 values were compared using an F-test of normalised data. Three co-cultures were performed as biological repeats, with measurements in triplicate. Data were collected using CD8 + T-cells from at least two donors. f-n . Image-based analysis of CD8 + T-cells interacting with Lo U-2 OS WT and Lo U-2 OS ICAM-1 cells [n=6 videos each with >20 interacting T cells; comparisons are made with T cells interacting with non ImmTAC-presenting U-2 OS cells (Fig. 2e-g)]. f, g . Average number of close contacts formed per T cell versus time (f) and 5’ after detecting the first close contact (g). h, i . Average summed area of close contacts per T cell versus time (h) and 5’ after detecting the first close contact (i). j, k . Average areas (j) and diameters (k) of all close contacts l . Average area of individual close contacts versus time. m, n . Average cumulative area of the target-cell surface scanned by a single T cell versus time (m) and 5’ after detecting the first close contact (n). Data were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons. Violin plots indicate median and quartiles. Imaging experiments were performed using CD8 + T-cells from at least two donors.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_15/10__1101_slash_2025__08__29__673015/10__1101_slash_2025__08__29__673015___F3.large.jpg)