java application gsea v4.1.0 (Broad Institute Inc)
Structured Review

Java Application Gsea V4.1.0, supplied by Broad Institute Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gsea+java+application/pmc09729904-80-6-13?v=Broad+Institute+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Elevated bile acid metabolism and microbiome are associated with suppressed cell proliferation and better survival in breast cancer"
Article Title: Elevated bile acid metabolism and microbiome are associated with suppressed cell proliferation and better survival in breast cancer
Journal: American Journal of Cancer Research
doi:
Figure Legend Snippet: GSEA and cell fractions of the high bile acid metabolism group. A. Dot plots show the gene sets that are significantly enriched in the high bile acid metabolism group (upper quartile) by GSEA in the TCGA, METABRIC, and GSE96058 cohorts. The horizontal scale and the color of each dot indicate normalized enrichment score (NES), and the size of each dot indicates false discovery rate (FDR). FDR less than 0.25 is considered significant. B. Box-and-whisker plots show the cell fractions of adipocytes, preadipocytes, vascular endothelial cell (VEC), lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC), and mesangial endothelial cells (MEC) according to the high and low bile acid scores (upper and lower quartiles) in the TCGA, METABRIC, and GSE96058 cohorts. All two-group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The error bars in each boxplot show the 95% confidence interval. The line in the box shows the median, and the top and bottom show the 25th and 75th percentiles respectively.
Techniques Used: Whisker Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: The association of bile acid metabolism and Nottingham histological grade, MKi67 expression, Hallmark cell proliferation-related gene sets, intratumoral heterogeneity, HRD, and mutation rates. A. Box-and-whisker plots of bile acid metabolism score by Nottingham histological grade in the TCGA, METABRIC, and GSE96058 cohorts. Scatter plots show the correlation between MKI67 gene expression and the score. B. Dot plots show the gene sets significantly enriched in the low bile acid metabolism group (lower quartile) by GSEA in the TCGA, METABRIC, and GSE96058 cohorts. The horizontal scale and the color of each dot indicate normalized enrichment score (NES), and the size of each dot indicates false discovery rate (FDR). FDR less than 0.25 was considered significant. C. Box-and-whisker plots show intratumoral heterogeneity, homologous recombination defects (HRD), silent or non-silent mutation rate, and proliferation scores according to the high and low bile acid scores (upper and lower quartiles) in TCGA. Multiple group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and two-group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The error bars in each boxplot show the 95% confidence interval. The line in the box shows the median, and the top and bottom show the 25th and 75th percentiles respectively.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Mutagenesis, Whisker Assay, Gene Expression, Homologous Recombination
Figure Legend Snippet: GSEA by bacterial species specific to high and low bile acid metabolism groups. (A) Dot plots show the gene sets significantly enriched by GSEA in groups with high or low abundances (median cutoff) of Gammaretrovirus, Hymenobacter, Anaerococcus, and Collimonas which were specific to the high bile acid metabolism group in TCGA. (B) Dot plots show the gene sets significantly enriched by GSEA in groups with high or low abundances (median cutoff) of Lactobacillus, Ruegeria, and Marichromatium which were specific to the low bile acid metabolism group in TCGA. The horizontal scale and the color of each dot indicate normalized enrichment score (NES) (high values are shown in red and low in blue in A, and vice versa in B), and the size of each dot indicates false discovery rate (FDR). FDR less than 0.25 is considered significant.
Techniques Used:


