dynabeads mrna purification kit (Thermo Fisher)
97
Structured Review
Thermo Fisher
dynabeads mrna purification kit

Dynabeads Mrna Purification Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 2221 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/goscript+reverse+transcriptase+rt-pcr+kit/Dynabeads+mRNA+Purification+Kit/pmc08081163-257-38-42
Average 97 stars, based on 2221 article reviews

Dynabeads Mrna Purification Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 2221 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/goscript+reverse+transcriptase+rt-pcr+kit/Dynabeads+mRNA+Purification+Kit/pmc08081163-257-38-42
Average 97 stars, based on 2221 article reviews
dynabeads mrna purification kit - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
97/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "The RNA helicase DDX5 promotes viral infection via regulating N 6 -methyladenosine levels on the DHX58 and NFκB transcripts to dampen antiviral innate immunity"
Article Title: The RNA helicase DDX5 promotes viral infection via regulating N 6 -methyladenosine levels on the DHX58 and NFκB transcripts to dampen antiviral innate immunity
Journal: PLoS Pathogens
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009530
Figure Legend Snippet: (A, B): m6A methylation of transcripts was detected by m6A qRT-PCR in DDX5-knockdown or DDX5 overexpressed MEFs after VSV infection. MEFs were transfected with DDX5 siRNA (siNC) for 48hand infected with VSV for 6h (A), and MEFs were transfected with Myc-DDX5 expressed vector (DDX5) or Myc tag control vector (Con) for 24h and infected with VSV for 6h (B). After extracting total RNA, purifying mRNA, and removing ribosomal RNA, purified mRNA was fragmented and incubated with anti-rabbit m6A or anti-rabbit IgG-conjugated dynabeads for 4h. RNA was isolated from the solution with phenol-chloroform, and cDNA was subjected to qRT-PCR using GAPDH, TBK1, DHX58, IKKγ, and p65 primers. Results are presented relative to those obtained with NC or control groups, and the expression of all the indicated proteins was analyzed using western blotting. (C, D): The interaction between METTL3 and transcripts was detected through METTL3 RIP qRT-PCR in knockdown-DDX5 (C) or DDX5-expressing (D) MEFs after VSV infection. MEFs were transfected with DDX5 siRNA (siNC) for 48 h and infected with VSV for 6 h (C), and transfected with DDX5 expression plasmid (DDX5) or control vector (Con) for 24 h, infected with VSV for 6h, and subjected to METTL3 RIP qRT-PCR to detect GAPDH, TBK1, DHX58, IKKγ, and p65. Results are presented relative to those obtained with NC or control groups, and the expression of all the indicated proteins was analyzed using western blotting. (E, F): Nuclear transcript retention increased in DDX5-knockdown MEFs. MEFs were transfected with DDX5 siRNA (siNC), infected with VSV for 8h, and lysed to extract nuclear to cytoplasmic RNA fractions. Then, RNA was used to analyze m6A modified DHX58, IKKγ, and p65 mRNA by m6A qRT-PCR (E) with RNU6 and GAPDH as the nuclear and cytoplasmic controls, respectively. The quantitative distribution of m6A modified DHX58, IKKγ, and p65 mRNAs in DDX5-knockdown MEFs were detected by m6A qRT-PCR (F). (G, H): Nuclear transcript export was increased in DDX5-expressing MEFs. MEFs were transfected with DDX5 expression plasmid (control vector), infected with VSV for 8h, and lysed to extract nuclear or cytoplasmic RNA; then, RNA was used to analyze m6A modified DHX58, IKKγ, and p65 mRNA by m6A qRT-PCR (G), and the quantitative distribution of these mRNAs was detected by m6AqRT-PCR (H). (I, J) : Immunoblot analysis of DHX58, IKKγ, and p65 in DDX5-knockdownMEFs (I) or DDX5-expressing MEFs (J) after infection with VSV at 0, 4, and 6 h. All data are mean ± SEM of biologically independent samples. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ns, no significant difference. * p <0.05, ** p <0.01, and *** p <0.001 (Student’s t -test).
Techniques Used: Methylation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Infection, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Purification, Incubation, Isolation, Expressing, Western Blot, Modification
Figure Legend Snippet: (A): m6A methylation of transcripts was detected in DDX5 +/+ or DDX5 +/- primary mouse macrophages infected for 8 h with VSV (MOI = 10). After extracting total RNA and purifying mRNA, mRNA was used to perform m6A qRT-PCR by incubating with anti-rabbit m6A or anti-rabbit IgG-conjugated dynabeads for 4 h. RNA was isolated and subjected to qRT-PCR using GAPDH, TBK1, DHX58, IKKγ, and p65 primers. Results are presented relative to those obtained in the control group, and the expression of DDX5 was analyzed bywestern blotting. (B): Immunoblot analysis of DDX5, DHX58, p65, and IKKγ in lysates of DDX5 +/+ or DDX5 +/- mouse macrophages infected for 0, 4, and 8 h with VSV (MOI = 10). (C, D): ELISA of IFN-β (C) and IL-6 (D) in cell supernatants ofDDX5 +/+ or DDX5 +/- mouse macrophages infected for 0, 4, and 8 h with VSV (MOI = 10). (E, F): ELISA of IFN-β (E) and IL-6 (F) in serum after DDX5 +/+ or DDX5 +/- mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or VSV (5×10 8 plaque-forming units/g body weight) for 8h (n = 6). (G, H): ELISA of IFN-β (G) and IL-6 (H) in serum after DDX5 +/+ or DDX5 +/- mice were intraperitoneally injected with PBS or SeV (1×10 8 plaque-forming units/g body weight) for 8h (n = 6). (I, J): The TCID 50 dose of VSV (I) or SeV (J) was measured in lungs, liver, and spleen of DDX5 +/+ or DDX5 +/- mice. (K): Pathological lesions in lungs, liver, and spleen of DDX5 +/+ or DDX5 +/- mice observed by hematoxylin-eosin staining with intraperitoneal injection of PBS, VSV (5×10 8 plaque-forming units/g body weight) or SeV (1×10 8 plaque-forming units/g body weight) for 12h. Scale bars, 100 μm. All data are presented as mean ± SEM of biologically independent samples. n = number of biological replicates. Data are representative of three independent experiments. NS, no significant difference. ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001 (Student’s t -test).
Techniques Used: Methylation, Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Isolation, Expressing, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Injection, Staining