Review



multiphysics fea simulator ls-dyna  (ANSYS inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    ANSYS inc multiphysics fea simulator ls-dyna
    Multiphysics Fea Simulator Ls Dyna, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fea+simulation/multiphysics+fea+simulator+ls+dyna/us11397227-340-27-31
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    multiphysics fea simulator ls-dyna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for nondestructively measuring physical properties of a material by observing induced displacements using different focal configurations
    Article Snippet: This force was applied onto the mesh for 80 μs, corresponding to 300 cycles given the transmit frequency, and the resulting displacement response was solved using the multiphysics FEA simulator LS-DYNA (ANSYS, Canonsburg, Pa., USA) at timesteps of 1 μs.



    Similar Products

    finite element analysis fea simulations  (Abaqus Inc)
    86
    Abaqus Inc finite element analysis fea simulations
    Finite Element Analysis Fea Simulations, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fea+simulation/abaqus+element+finite+software/us12624478-682-18-30
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    finite element analysis fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    3d fea simulation  (Abaqus Inc)
    86
    Abaqus Inc 3d fea simulation
    ( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
    3d Fea Simulation, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fea+simulation/fea+simulation/pmc13127580-300-1-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3d fea simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    fea simulation  (Abaqus Inc)
    86
    Abaqus Inc fea simulation
    ( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
    Fea Simulation, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fea+simulation/abaqus+fe+software/us12604398-216-0-23
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fea simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    quasi static fea simulations  (Abaqus Inc)
    86
    Abaqus Inc quasi static fea simulations
    ( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
    Quasi Static Fea Simulations, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fea+simulation/fea+simulations/pmc13004017-157-0-6
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    quasi static fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    fea simulations  (Abaqus Inc)
    86
    Abaqus Inc fea simulations
    ( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
    Fea Simulations, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fea+simulation/fea+simulations/pm41861013-194-2-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    abaqus fea simulation  (Abaqus Inc)
    86
    Abaqus Inc abaqus fea simulation
    ( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
    Abaqus Fea Simulation, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/fea+simulation/fea+simulations/pmc12635296-395-7-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    abaqus fea simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) 3D-FEA stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: A robust adhesive microneedle for oral infections therapy via synergistic antibacterial and neutrophil-macrophage axis immunomodulation

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aee4401

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) 3D-FEA stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.

    Article Snippet: A 3D-FEA simulation was conducted in the ABAQUS software.

    Techniques: Shear, Adhesive, Fluorescence, Labeling