ilf2 expression constructs (OriGene)
Structured Review

Ilf2 Expression Constructs, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/expression+constructs/pmc12887532-41-4-10?v=OriGene
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Scaffolding of the H4K5ac chromatin remodeling complex by lncRNA MAHAC mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition"
Article Title: Scaffolding of the H4K5ac chromatin remodeling complex by lncRNA MAHAC mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition
Journal: Nucleic Acids Research
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag101
Figure Legend Snippet: MAHAC scaffolds the ILF3/NF90–ILF2–CBP complex. ( A ) Co-immunoprecipitation experiments using anti-ILF3 antibodies pulled down ILF3, NF90, ILF2, and CBP from H1299 cell extracts, whereas other HAT members (Tip60, HBO1, HAT1, p300) were not detected in the immunoprecipitates by Western blot analysis. ( B ) RNA pull-down assays confirmed the scaffolding of ILF3/NF90-ILF2-CBP complex by MAHAC using H1299 cell extracts. Biotinylated MAHAC RNA samples (sense and anti-sense) were detected by Streptavidin-HRP. Biotinylated anti-sense MAHAC and beads were used as controls. ( C ) UV-crosslinking RNA pull-down assays confirmed the endogenous interaction between MAHAC and the ILF3/NF90-ILF2-CBP complex in H1299 cell lysates. RNase A treatment was used to confirm that the observed associations were mediated by MAHAC RNA. ( D ) CLIP assays confirmed that the antibodies against ILF3/NF90, ILF2, or CBP could pull down endogenous MAHAC . UV-crosslinked cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies. The amount of co-immunoprecipitated MAHAC was quantified by RT-qPCR and expressed as a percentage of the total input RNA. ( E ) Knockdown of MAHAC abolished the interaction between CBP and ILF3/NF90-ILF2 using co-immunoprecipitation experiments of H1299 cell extracts. ( F ) RNase treatment abolished the interaction between CBP and ILF3/NF90-ILF2ILF3 using co-immunoprecipitation experiments of H1299 cell extracts. ( G ) Knockdown of MAHAC abolished the interaction between CBP and ILF3/NF90-ILF2 using co-immunoprecipitation experiments of H1299 cell extracts. Scr-si, scrambled siRNA used as a control; N, normoxia; H, hypoxia. *, P < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Scaffolding, Quantitative RT-PCR, Knockdown, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Mapping of the binding regions between MAHAC and the ILF3/NF90–ILF2–CBP complex. ( A ) The predicted secondary structure of MAHAC using the RNA secondary structure prediction program. ( B ) Deletion and truncation mapping experiments showed that the nucleotides 498–1022 region in MAHAC was responsible for anchoring the ILF3/NF90–ILF2–CBP complex. ( C ) Further domain mapping experiments showed that the MAHAC ribonucleotides 658–767 region anchored the ILF3/NF90–ILF2–CBP complex. ( D ) Mapping of the region inside MAHAC showed that the region II-1 (nt 686–741) bound to the ILF3/NF90–ILF2–CBP complex. The illustration on the left shows the RNA corresponding to different fragments of the MAHAC II. Denaturing agarose gel stained with EtBr showing in vitro transcribed MAHAC II, MAHAC II-1, and MAHAC II-2 transcripts. ( E ) Mapping of the MAHAC region required for CBP interaction. Schematic illustration of the RNA secondary structures for MAHAC fragments II-1 and II-1–7. RNA pull-down assays using in vitro transcribed biotinylated MAHAC fragments. Denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis stained with EtBr confirmed the size of the in vitro transcribed MAHAC II-1 and MAHAC II-1–7 transcripts. ( F ) Overexpression of the MAHAC II-1 region induced the global H4K5ac levels.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Agarose Gel Electrophoresis, Staining, In Vitro, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: The MAHAC nt 686–741 fragment is essential for its functions. ( A ) UV-crosslinking RNA pull-down assays showed that restoration with wild-type MAHAC , but not the MAHAC -Δ686–741 mutant, pulled down the ILF3/NF90-ILF2-CBP complex in H1299 cells under MAHAC knockdown. ( B ) CLIP-qPCR analysis showed that wild-type MAHAC , but not MAHAC -Δ686–741, could be pulled down by antibodies against ILF3/NF90, ILF2, or CBP antibodies in MAHAC -knockdown H1299 cells, followed by restoration with wild-type MAHAC or MAHAC -Δ686–741. ( C ) Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in MAHAC -knockdown H1299 cells showed that the restoration with wild-type MAHAC , but not MAHAC -Δ686–741, promoted the interaction between CBP and the ILF3/NF90-ILF2 complex. ( D ) The restoration with wild-type MAHAC , but not MAHAC -Δ686–741, induced H4K5ac levels in MAHAC -knockdown H1299 cells. ( E and F ) The restoration with wild-type MAHAC , but not MAHAC -Δ686–741, promoted EMT, cell migration, and invasion in MAHAC -knockdown H1299 cells. * P < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Knockdown, Immunoprecipitation, Migration
Figure Legend Snippet: The binding pattern between MAHAC and ILF3/NF90. ( A ) Measurement of stoichiometry showed a ratio of 1:1 between NF90 and MAHAC . The RNA EMSA data showed that the binding of NF90 to MAHAC establishes a 1:1 stoichiometry of the complex. The molar ratio of NF90 to MAHAC is listed above the lane. The positions of NF90- MAHAC complexes and free MAHAC are shown. ( B ) The stoichiometry of MAHAC bound to NF90 was measured by filter binding assay. Compare the data with theoretical saturation curves for protein:RNA stoichiometric ratios of 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1. The 1:1 curve is the closest to the data, thus confirming that one copy of MAHAC interacted with a single NF90 molecule. ( C ) Cooperative binding between ILF3 and NF90 using tagged full-length ILF3 and truncated NF90 showed that heterodimers of ILF3 and NF90 had the strongest binding to the MAHAC -II-1 region using RNA EMSA assay (lower panel). The diagram shows the protein domain of full-length ILF3 and truncated NF90 (upper panel). The usage of HA antibody (HA Ab labeling) was to supershift the ILF3 and NF90 complex. ( D ) Allosteric activation of H4K5ac by incubating MAHAC -II-1 with ILF3, NF90, ILF2, CBP, and histone H4 in in vitro HAT assays.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Filter-binding Assay, Labeling, Activation Assay, In Vitro
Figure Legend Snippet: Bioinformatics analysis of H4K5ac-marked genes regulated by hypoxia and MAHAC overexpression and a model to depict the regulation of H4K5ac mark and hypoxia-induced EMT/tumor progression by MAHAC II-1. ( A ) The pie chart showed the genome-wide distribution of H4K5ac ChIP-seq peaks under hypoxia. A total of 82204 peaks (32.08%) exhibited significant increases in H4K5ac signal under hypoxia. ( B ) Genomic annotation showed that hypoxia-induced H4K5ac peaks were significantly enriched at promoter regions compared with peaks located in other genomic regions (χ² test, P < 2 × 10 -26 ). ( C ) A Venn diagram illustrates the number of genes whose promoters were occupied by hypoxia-induced H4K5ac and regulated by hypoxia and MAHAC overexpression. ( D ) KEGG pathway analysis was performed on the 309 overlapping genes. ( E ) Functional categorization of the 309 overlapping genes revealed the biologically relevant processes that they belong to, including angiogenesis, stemness, and cancer metabolism. ( F ) A model of MAHAC- II-1 anchoring the ILF3/NF90-ILF2-CBP complex to mediate H4K5ac and promote EMT/tumor progression is depicted. The UGA-like box (shaded in pink) is shown to be the putative binding region by ILF3/NF90. A putative CBP-interacting region (shaded in yellow) within the same MAHAC- II-1 sequence is also indicated. Black color indicates lncRNA; orange color indicates histones; blue color indicates histone H4K5 acetylation.
Techniques Used: Over Expression, Genome Wide, ChIP-sequencing, Functional Assay, Binding Assay, Sequencing


