expression construct for bovine aqp0 pxβg-aqp0 (Johns Hopkins HealthCare)
Structured Review

Expression Construct For Bovine Aqp0 Pxβg Aqp0, supplied by Johns Hopkins HealthCare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/expression+constructs/pmc03581697-21-5-12?v=Johns+Hopkins+HealthCare
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Regulation of AQP0 water permeability is enhanced by cooperativity"
Article Title: Regulation of AQP0 water permeability is enhanced by cooperativity
Journal: The Journal of General Physiology
doi: 10.1085/jgp.201210884
Figure Legend Snippet: Topology and structure of AQP0. (A) Each AQP0 monomer is composed of six transmembrane domains (1–6) and five loops (A–E) in rainbow color (ROYGIBV). The pore is formed by two half helices and loops B and E (in green) folded back into the membrane. Major players in the cooperativity are H40 in the external loop A and S235 in the C terminus tail. (B) The tetramer is shown from the extracelluar side with the four monomers (blue and mustard) and the two CaMs (red). Both panels were generated with VMD from a molecular dynamics simulation based on crystal structures (deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession no. 1TM8 for AQP0; ; and Protein Data Bank accession no. 1NWD for CaM; ) originally modeled together in .
Techniques Used: Membrane, Generated
Figure Legend Snippet: pH dose–response curve of the water permeability of AQP0. The solid black line is a fit to the Hill equation, with n = 4 (χ 2 /DOF = 0.0068 and R 2 = 0.994).
Techniques Used: Permeability
Figure Legend Snippet: Calcium cooperativity. (A) Effect of calcium concentration on the water permeability of mixed injection of AQP0 (WT) and a mutant S235D. Mix 1:1 represents 10 ng AQP0 and 10 ng of mutant H40C (fraction of insensitive monomer = 10/20 = 0.5), mix 1:5 represents 2 ng AQP0 and 10 ng of mutant H40C (fraction of insensitive monomer = 2/12 = 0.17), mix 5:1 = 10 ng AQP0 and 2 ng of mutant H40C (fraction of insensitive monomer = 2/12 = 0.17), and mix 1:9 represents 1 ng AQP0 and 9 ng S235D. The left-hand panel shows the response of WT AQP0. Note that P f increases when the calcium concentration is decreased. In contrast, an increased calcium concentration increases P f in the S235D mutant. When the two are mixed so as to form hetero tetramers, even 20% of WT is sufficient to suppress completely the P f increase induced by 5 mM calcium, whereas the proportional increase in P f induced by lowering calcium remains. When the mixture contains 80% WT, the low calcium response is still present in proportion to the amount of WT, but the elevated calcium response is completely suppressed. The horizontal dotted line represents the water permeability of uninjected oocytes. (B) Fraction of increase plotted against the fraction of insensitive monomer. (For no Ca 2+ response, S235D is the insensitive monomer. For 5-mM Ca 2+ response, WT is the insensitive monomer.) Experimental results for 5-mM Ca 2+ increase are plotted as purple triangles and are well fit by a curve calculated from the binomial distribution assuming one insensitive monomer is sufficient to render the whole tetramer insensitive and with a bias of 0.5 kT for WT to associate with mutants in a tetramer (dashed purple curve; χ 2 = 1.260). The dotted black curve is calculated assuming no bias and that one insensitive monomer is sufficient to render the entire tetramer insensitive to Ca 2+ increase (χ 2 = 3.133). Experimental data for zero calcium are plotted as blue squares and are well fit by a straight line (the theoretical prediction assuming each monomer acts independently of the others in the tetramer; χ 2 /DOF = 0.18774 and R 2 = 0.557; blue straight line). Positive and negative errors are equal, but error bars are shown in only one direction to avoid clutter.
Techniques Used: Concentration Assay, Permeability, Injection, Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: pH cooperativity. (A) Effect of acid and alkaline pH on the water permeability of mixtures of AQP0 (WT) and the H40C mutant. WT responds to acid pH, whereas the H40C mutant responds to alkaline pH. Mix 5:1 represents 10 ng AQP0 and 2 ng of mutant H40C (fraction of insensitive monomer = 2/12 = 0.166), and mix 1:1 represents 10 ng AQP0 and 10 ng of mutant H40C (fraction of insensitive monomer = 10/20 = 0.5). The P f of the mix 1:1 at pH 8.5 is greater than the P f at pH 7.5, with a p-value of 5 × 10 −5 (Student’s t test). The horizontal dotted line represents the water permeability of uninjected oocytes. (B) Fraction of increase plotted against the fraction of insensitive monomer. (For acid pH, the H40C mutant is the insensitive monomer. For alkaline pH, WT is the insensitive monomer.) Experimental results for acid pH are plotted as red squares and are well fit by a curve calculated from the binomial distribution of monomers randomly partitioning into each tetramer and the assumption that a single insensitive monomer renders the whole tetramer insensitive to acid pH (dashed red line; χ 2 = 0.840). The curve assuming that two insensitive monomers are required to render the tetramer insensitive to acid pH (dashed black line; χ 2 = 8.88) does not fit the experimental data. Experimental results for alkaline pH are plotted as green circles and are well fit by a straight line (the theoretical prediction assuming each monomer acts independently of the others in the tetramer; χ 2 /DOF = 0.071 and R 2 = 0.910; solid green line). Each data point is the average of experiments using nine oocytes from three different batches.
Techniques Used: Permeability, Mutagenesis



