Review



deltavision spectristm model dv4tm deconvolution microscope  (Applied Precision Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Applied Precision Inc deltavision spectristm model dv4tm deconvolution microscope
    Deltavision Spectristm Model Dv4tm Deconvolution Microscope, supplied by Applied Precision Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/deltavision+microscope/us11260089-460-9-15
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deltavision spectristm model dv4tm deconvolution microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Fluorescence:

    Article Title: Characterization of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum Tepsin homolog.
    Article Snippet: Immunoblots were developed using ECL (Bio-Rad). .. Fluorescence images of parasites were captured using a GE Applied Precision Deltavision Elite microscope with ×100 1.4 NA objective and with a sCMOS camera and deconvolved with the SoftWorx software. ..

    Microscopy:

    Article Title: Characterization of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum Tepsin homolog.
    Article Snippet: Immunoblots were developed using ECL (Bio-Rad). .. Fluorescence images of parasites were captured using a GE Applied Precision Deltavision Elite microscope with ×100 1.4 NA objective and with a sCMOS camera and deconvolved with the SoftWorx software. ..

    Article Title: A tool to pulse-label yeast Nuclear Pore Complexes in imaging and biochemical experiments
    Article Snippet: .. Images were acquired using a Deltavision Elite (Applied Precision) microscope, using an Olympus UPlanSApo 100x (NA 1.4) oil immersion objective and equipped with an EDGE sCMOS5.5 camera for detection. ..

    Article Title:
    Article Snippet: :2081 71 2022;Gut, et al. Søndergaard JN Antifade Mountant (P36934, Thermo Fischer Scientific). .. Images were captured with widefield DeltaVision microscope (Applied Precision, LLC) equipped with a Coolsnap HQ2 12 bit camera with 1x1 binning and 896x896 frame size. .. We acquired 20-30 optical slices depending on the thickness of the cell lines at 0.3-μm intervals using Olympus 100x (1.4 numerical aperture) oil immersion objectives.

    Article Title: Nuclear deformability increases PARPi sensitivity in BRCA1-deficient cells by increasing microtubule-dependent DNA break mobility.
    Article Snippet: 6 h before the imaging and 72 h after the last Cre infection, PARPi (0.5 μM)wasadded and, in the last hour before the imaging, the medium was changed into Leibovitz’s L-15 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 15% FBS, non-essential amino acids, L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, and PARPi. .. Imaging was done at 37 °C in an environmental chamber using a DeltaVision RT microscope system (Applied Precision) with a PlanApo 60 × 1.40 NA objective lens (Olympus America, Inc.). .. Five micrometers Z-stacks at 0.5 μm steps were acquired using SoftWoRx software with 500ms exposure time, every 30 s over 10min (t = 21 frames) at 1 × 1 binning with 1024 × 1024 pixels in final size (0.108 μm).

    other:

    Article Title: HIV-1 binds dynein directly to hijack microtubule transport machinery
    Article Snippet: Z-stack images were acquired using a DeltaVision wide-field fluorescent microscope (Applied Precision, GE Healthcare) equipped with a CoolSNAP camera (CoolSNAP HQ, Photometrics) using a 60× objective lens.

    Article Title: HIV-1 binds dynein directly to hijack microtubule transport machinery.
    Article Snippet: Z- stack images were acquired using a DeltaVision wide- field fluorescent microscope (Applied Precision, GE Healthcare) equipped with a CoolSNAP camera (CoolSNAP HQ, Photometrics) using a 60× objective lens.

    Article Title: TopBP1 coordinates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis via recruitment of the nuclease scaffold SLX4.
    Article Snippet: Fluorescence microscopy was performed using a wide-field microscope (DeltaVision Elite; Applied Precision) equipped with a 100× objective lens with a numerical aperture of 1.4 (U-PLAN S-APO, NA 1.4; Olympus), a cooled EMCCD camera (Evolve 512; Photometrics), and a solid-state illumination source (Insight; Applied Precision, Inc.).

    Article Title: Supporting Information for Nuclear envelope budding inhibition slows down progerin-induced aging process
    Article Snippet: Coverslips were mounted using mowiol (Merck), and DNA was stained using 1 μg/mL DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich).

    Imaging:

    Article Title: Nuclear deformability increases PARPi sensitivity in BRCA1-deficient cells by increasing microtubule-dependent DNA break mobility.
    Article Snippet: 6 h before the imaging and 72 h after the last Cre infection, PARPi (0.5 μM)wasadded and, in the last hour before the imaging, the medium was changed into Leibovitz’s L-15 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 15% FBS, non-essential amino acids, L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, and PARPi. .. Imaging was done at 37 °C in an environmental chamber using a DeltaVision RT microscope system (Applied Precision) with a PlanApo 60 × 1.40 NA objective lens (Olympus America, Inc.). .. Five micrometers Z-stacks at 0.5 μm steps were acquired using SoftWoRx software with 500ms exposure time, every 30 s over 10min (t = 21 frames) at 1 × 1 binning with 1024 × 1024 pixels in final size (0.108 μm).



    Similar Products

    86
    Chenomx Inc deconvolution model
    Deconvolution Model, supplied by Chenomx Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/deconvolution+model/pm42167029-205-17-9
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deconvolution model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Siemens Healthineers deconvolution model
    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the <t>deconvolution</t> model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.
    Deconvolution Model, supplied by Siemens Healthineers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/deconvolution+model/pmc12550029-97-10-13
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deconvolution model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Decon Laboratories blood volume using the deconvolution model bv
    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the <t>deconvolution</t> model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.
    Blood Volume Using The Deconvolution Model Bv, supplied by Decon Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/blood+volume+using+the+deconvolution+model+bv/pmc11320886-132-7-14
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    blood volume using the deconvolution model bv - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics deconvolution by topic model (stride)
    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the <t>deconvolution</t> model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.
    Spatial Transcriptomics Deconvolution By Topic Model (Stride), supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/spatial+transcriptomics+deconvolution+by+topic+modeling++stride++method/pm38267084-114-4-0
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptomics deconvolution by topic model (stride) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics deconvolution by topic modeling (stride) method
    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the <t>deconvolution</t> model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.
    Spatial Transcriptomics Deconvolution By Topic Modeling (Stride) Method, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/spatial+transcriptomics+deconvolution+by+topic+modeling++stride++method/pm37919720-115-26-20
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptomics deconvolution by topic modeling (stride) method - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Infometrix Inc simca model with 2 nd derivative data deconvolution on pirouette software
    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the <t>deconvolution</t> model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.
    Simca Model With 2 Nd Derivative Data Deconvolution On Pirouette Software, supplied by Infometrix Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/simca+model+with+2+nd+derivative+data+deconvolution+on+pirouette+software/pmc10657999-110-18-21
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    simca model with 2 nd derivative data deconvolution on pirouette software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc implementation of model-free deconvolution
    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the <t>deconvolution</t> model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.
    Implementation Of Model Free Deconvolution, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/pmc09884306-126-43-39
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    implementation of model-free deconvolution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Applied Precision Inc deltavision spectristm model dv4tm deconvolution microscope
    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the <t>deconvolution</t> model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.
    Deltavision Spectristm Model Dv4tm Deconvolution Microscope, supplied by Applied Precision Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/deconvolution+model/deltavision+microscope/us11260089-460-9-15
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    deltavision spectristm model dv4tm deconvolution microscope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the deconvolution model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Model based noise correction enhances the accuracy of pancreatic CT perfusion blood flow measurements

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-24482-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A flow chart illustrating the complete noise correction process for blood flow (BF) measurements, including evaluation using digital perfusion phantom (DPP) (starting from the first block) and evaluation using a clinical dataset (starting from the second block). For the DPP analysis, each GTBF value is simulated using two independent sets of 576 noise-impacted TACs, resulting in BF1 and BF2 estimates for random error calculation. This process is repeated for 28 GTBF values, totaling 16,128 TACs. For the clinical dataset, patient BF values calculated using the deconvolution model from Mayer’s study were used as input for the noise-impacted BF maps. BFD represents the noise-impacted BF measurements, which need to be corrected. IRF is the impulse response function, AIF is the arterial input function, TAC represents the tissue attenuation curve, and GTBF is the ground-truth blood flow. BFD corr (i) represents the noise-corrected BF measurement for the i th iteration. The random error and model error calculations are also shown in the flow chart. This iterative process for DPP continues until BFD corr aligns with GTBF or until the error between GTBF and corrected measurements is minimized to an acceptable threshold.

    Article Snippet: All evaluations in this study were performed using a commercial deconvolution model (syngo.via, Siemens Healthineers) with fixed reconstruction parameters such as slice thickness, reconstruction kernel, and matrix size selected to reflect standard clinical CTp practice.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay