sm-64 data storage module (Campbell Science)
90
Structured Review
Campbell Science
sm-64 data storage module
Sm 64 Data Storage Module, supplied by Campbell Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/data+storage+system+module/sm+64+data+storage+module/pm21628147-82-17-21
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Sm 64 Data Storage Module, supplied by Campbell Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/data+storage+system+module/sm+64+data+storage+module/pm21628147-82-17-21
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sm-64 data storage module - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Leaf phenology in relation to canopy closure in southern Appalachian trees. Article Snippet: Shade tolerance — the ability to survive and grow in shaded microsites — is a key factor determining the distribution of plant species and growth forms across spatial and successional gradients ( Horn, 1971 ; Givnish, 1988 ; Canham et al., 1994 , 2006 ; Kobe, 1996 , 1999 ; Pacala et al., 1993 ; Montgomery and Chazdon, 2002 ; Reich et al., 2003 ; Kneeshaw et al., 2006 ).. Ecophysiological studies aimed at explaining differences among species in shade tolerance have focused mainly on differences in (1) static and dynamic photosynthetic light responses at the leaf level (e.g., Bj ö rkman, 1981 ; Chazdon, 1988 ; Givnish, 1988 ; Lei and Lechowicz, 1990 ; Ellsworth and Reich, 1992 ; Kitajima, 1994 ; Walters and Reich, 1999 ; Valladares et al., 2000 ; Montgomery and Chazdon, 2002 ; Givnish et al., 2004 ); (2) leaf susceptibility to photoinhibition and other forms of photodamage ( Powles and Bj ö rkman, 1981 ; Kursar and Coley, 1999 ; Adams et al., 2004 ; Valladares et al., 2005 ); (3) canopy geometry and self-shading ( Horn, 1971 ; Pearcy and Yang, 1996 , 1998 ; Valladares and Pearcy, 1999 ; Naumburg et al., 2001 ); and (4) resource allocation to photosynthetic vs. nonphotosynthetic tissues ( Givnish, 1988 ; Givnish et al., 2004 ; Montgomery, 2004 ; Kneeshaw et al., 2006 ).. Much less attention has been focused on the role of leaf phenology — that is, the timing of leaf fl ush, expansion, photosynthetic activity, and senescence — in determining shade tolerance. |