compound microscopes zeiss axioscope (Carl Zeiss)
Carl Zeiss is a verified supplier 
Carl Zeiss manufactures this product 
90
Structured Review
Carl Zeiss
compound microscopes zeiss axioscope
Compound Microscopes Zeiss Axioscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/compound+microscope/axioscope+compound+microscopes+zeiss/pmc06055699-85-8-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Compound Microscopes Zeiss Axioscope, supplied by Carl Zeiss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/compound+microscope/axioscope+compound+microscopes+zeiss/pmc06055699-85-8-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
compound microscopes zeiss axioscope - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Redescription of Tintinnopsis everta Kofoid and Campbell 1929 (Alveolata, Ciliophora, Tintinnina) Based on Taxonomic and Genetic Analyses—Discovery of a New Complex Ciliary Pattern Article Snippet: Morphology of the living cell was investigated under Article Title: Taxonomy of Aphelinoidea (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) species attacking eggs of the beet leafhopper, Circulifer tenellus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), in California Article Snippet: Species of Aphelinoidea Girault known to parasitize eggs of the beet leafhopper, Circulifer tenellus (Baker), in California were studied using both morphological and molecular characters.. These include two introduced species (from Iran and Turkmenistan) as well as two indigenous species, A. zarehi n. sp. and A. roja n. sp. Earlier studies had identified the indigenous Aphelinoidea in California and other arid western states as A. plutella Girault, but we did not find putative A. plutella in our surveys of parasitoids of beet leafhopper eggs in California.. We conclude that the earlier studies misidentified other indigenous species as A. plutella, and that at least some of these misidentifications were actually A. zarehi, one of the two new species described herein. |