cycloheximide (Chem Impex International)
95
Structured Review
Chem Impex International
cycloheximide

Cycloheximide, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chx/Cycloheximide/pmc09340482-25-0-5
Average 95 stars, based on 4 article reviews

Cycloheximide, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chx/Cycloheximide/pmc09340482-25-0-5
Average 95 stars, based on 4 article reviews
cycloheximide - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
95/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "Mitotic checkpoint gene expression is tuned by codon usage bias"
Article Title: Mitotic checkpoint gene expression is tuned by codon usage bias
Journal: The EMBO Journal
doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107896
Figure Legend Snippet: A Cellular protein noise (coefficient of variation, CV = std / mean) in live‐cell microscopy images of S. pombe ; n = 7 images (Nmt1‐GFP), 11 (Mad1‐GFP), 19 (Mad2‐GFP), 10 (Mad3‐GFP); single images had 16–79 GFP‐positive and 6–94 GFP‐negative (control) cells. Boxplots show median and interquartile range (IQR); whiskers extend to values no further than 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartile, respectively. Mad1, Mad2, and Mad3 all showed significantly lower noise than Nmt1 (Wilcoxon rank sum test; all P < 0.001). B Simulations of stochastic gene expression noise from selected mRNA/protein half‐life combinations assuming a constantly active promoter (see Methods). Synthesis rates were set to obtain a mean mRNA number of 4 per cell, and a mean protein number of 6,000 per cell. The x‐axis of each graph shows time, the y‐axis shows mRNA number per cell (blue) or protein number per cell (black). C Theoretical prediction for the coefficient of variation (CV = std/mean) of the protein number per cell, assuming different mRNA and protein half‐lives, using the same underlying model as in B. Synthesis rates were adjusted to maintain a mean mRNA number per cell of 3.5, and a mean protein number per cell of 6,000 (approx. 100 nM). D mRNA abundances by qPCR following metabolic labeling and removal of the labeled pool (two independent experiments). Lines are regression curves from generalized linear mixed model fits, excluding the measurements at t = 0 in order to accommodate for noninstantaneous labeling by 4tU. Act1 + and ecm33 + were used as long and short half‐life controls, respectively; qPCR was performed for the endogenous mRNAs. Half‐lives (95% confidence interval): mad1 + 5.6 min (4.3–8.4), mad2 + 7.7 min (6.2–10.4), mad3 + 5.2 min (4.3–6.9), act1 + 61.8 min (37.2–172.3), ecm33 + 5.0 min (4.5–5.7). E Protein abundances after translation shut‐off with cycloheximide (CHX); n = 3 experiments, error bars = std. Lines indicate fit to a one‐phase exponential decay. Cdc2 and Cdc13 were used as long and short half‐life controls, respectively. Immunoblots for the endogenous proteins (no tag). A representative experiment shown in Appendix Fig . Source data are available online for this figure.
Techniques Used: Microscopy, Negative Control, Expressing, Labeling, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet:
Techniques Used: Recombinant, In Vitro, Sequencing, Labeling, Protease Inhibitor, Isolation, Magnetic Beads, Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay, Software, Membrane
Related Articles
Lysis:Article Title: A Processive Protein Chimera Introduces Mutations across Defined DNA Regions In Vivo Article Snippet: Gene blocks were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. .. Reagents: The following reagents were obtained as indicated: Kanamycin monosulfate, fosfomycin, agar, and chloramphenicol (Alfa Aesar J61272, J66602, A10752, and B20841, respectively); tetracycline hydrochloride (CalBioChem 58346); rifampicin (TCI R0079); ampicillin (Fisher Bioreagents BP1760-25); streptomycin sulfate (MP Biomedical 100556); tetrazolium chloride, L-rhamnose, antifoam-204, and ethyl methanesulfonate (Sigma-Aldrich T8877, W373011, A8311, and M0880, respectively); other:Article Title: Targeting oncoproteins with a positive selection assay for protein degraders Article Snippet: The following compounds were purchased: POM (Selleck, #S1567), LEN (Selleck, #S1029), MG132 ( N -carbobenzyloxy- l -leucyl- l -leucyl- l -leucinal; Thermo Fisher Scientific, #47479020MG), MLN4924 (Active Biochem, #A-1139), MLN7243 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #NC1129906), Spautin-1 (BioTechne; #5197/10), cycloheximide (VWR, #97064-724), Article Title: Mitotic checkpoint gene expression is tuned by codon usage bias. Article Snippet: Reagent/Resource Reference or Source Identifier or Catalog Number Experimental models Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains This study Appendix Table S1 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Nick Buchler, NC State University, USA Appendix Table S1 Recombinant DNA sgRNA sequences This study Appendix Table S2 Codon-optimized mad1, mad2, and mad3 This study Appendix Table S3 PCR fragments for in vitro transcription This study Appendix Table S6 Antibodies Mouse anti-Cdc13 (monoclonal) Novus Cat # NB200-576; RRID: AB_10003103 Rabbit anti-Cdc2 (polyclonal) Santa-Cruz Cat # sc-53; RRID: AB_2074908 Mouse anti-GFP (mix of 2 monoclonals) Roche Cat # 11814460001; RRID: AB_390913 Rabbit anti-Mad1 (polyclonal, against peptide ADSPRDPFQSRSQLC) Heinrich et al (2013), PMID: 24161933 N/A Rabbit anti-Mad2 (polyclonal, against recombinant protein) Sewart and Hauf (2017), PMID: 28366743 N/A Rabbit anti-Mad3 (polyclonal, against recombinant protein) Sewart and Hauf (2017), PMID: 28366743 N/A Rabbit anti-Strep-tag II (monoclonal, recombinant) Abcam Cat # ab180957 Rabbit anti-Strep-tag II (polyclonal) Abcam Cat # ab76949; RRID: AB_1524455 Mouse anti-tubulin Sigma Cat # T5168; RRID: AB_477579 Goat anti-mouse HRP Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat # 115–035-003; RRID: AB_10015289 Goat anti-rabbit HRP Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat # 111–035-003; RRID: AB_2313567 Oligonucleotides and other sequence-based reagents FISH probes This study Appendix Table S4 qPCR primers This study Appendix Table S5 Chemicals, enzymes, and other reagents |