mouse α human cd261 dr4 biotin (Miltenyi Biotec)
Miltenyi Biotec is a verified supplier 
Miltenyi Biotec manufactures this product 
93
Structured Review
Miltenyi Biotec
mouse α human cd261 dr4 biotin
Mouse α Human Cd261 Dr4 Biotin, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd261/CD261+Antibody%2C+anti-human/pmc09346491-47-0-8
Average 93 stars, based on 8 article reviews
Mouse α Human Cd261 Dr4 Biotin, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd261/CD261+Antibody%2C+anti-human/pmc09346491-47-0-8
Average 93 stars, based on 8 article reviews
mouse α human cd261 dr4 biotin - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
93/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "Engagement of TRAIL triggers degranulation and IFNγ production in human natural killer cells"
Article Title: Engagement of TRAIL triggers degranulation and IFNγ production in human natural killer cells
Journal: EMBO Reports
doi: 10.15252/embr.202154133
Figure Legend Snippet: Primary human CD4 T cells from eight different donors ( n = 8) were separately infected with lab‐adapted and primary HIV‐1 strains. Combined expression of DR4 and DR5 was assessed by flow cytometry 4 days after infection. Uninfected CD4 T cells were determined as CD4‐positive and HIV‐1 p24‐negative, infected cells as CD4‐negative and p24‐positive. Histograms (overlay) of one representative donor displaying combined DR4/5 surface expression on CD4 T cells previously incubated with NL4‐3, JR‐CSF, WITO, CH198, or CH236. Expression is displayed as fluorescence intensity ( x ‐axis). Comparison of the combined surface expression of DR4/5 between mock (white circles), uninfected (grey circles), and infected CD4 T cells (orange circles), from left to right: Mock: n = 8; NL4‐3: n = 8; JR‐CSF: n = 8; WITO: n = 7; CH198: n = 7; CH236: n = 8 (7–8 different donors per condition). Expression is displayed as relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) after normalization to the respective secondary AB‐only control ( y ‐axis). Data information: Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Values for non‐infected and infected cells of the same donor are connected with lines. Source data are available online for this figure.
Techniques Used: Infection, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Fluorescence, Comparison, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Degranulation of primary human NK cells after co‐culture with various target cells in the presence or absence of αTRAIL or αDR4/5. Comparison of CD107a expression after co‐culture with 721.221 target cells with either 10 µg/ml αTRAIL or isotype control (Iso) using flow cytometry ( n = 10 different donors per condition). Each data point represents the mean of two technical replicates. Effector:target ratio was 1:1. Left panel: Concatenated density plot depicting CD107a expression as fluorescence intensity for one representative donor. Right panel: Box plots showing relative frequency of CD107a + NK cells ( y ‐axis). Box plots display inhibition of degranulation ( y ‐axis) after co‐culture with 721.221 target cells in presence of either isotype or αTRAIL as relative reduction compared to no antibody ( n = 10 different donors per condition). Comparison of CD107a expression after co‐culture with autologous HIV‐I‐infected CD4 T cells with either 10 µg/ml αTRAIL or isotype control (Iso) using flow cytometry ( n = 9 different donors per condition). Each data point represents the mean of two technical replicates. Left panel: Concatenated density plot depicting CD107a expression as fluorescence intensity for one representative donor. Right panel: Box plots showing relative frequency of CD107a + NK cells ( y ‐axis). Box plots display inhibition of degranulation ( y ‐axis) after co‐culture with autologous HIV‐I‐infected CD4 T cells in the presence of either isotype or αTRAIL as relative reduction compared to no antibody ( n = 9 different donors per condition). Representative histograms (overlay, left panel) and bar graphs ( n = 3 independent experiments, right panel) showing the individual and combined surface expression of DR4 and DR5 on 721.221 cells. Each data point represents the mean of three technical replicates. Comparison of CD107a expression after co‐culture with 721.221 target cells in the presence of either αDR4/5 (10 µg/ml each) or 20 µg/ml isotype control (Iso) using flow cytometry ( n = 9 different donors per condition). Effector:target ratio was 1:1. Box plots showing relative frequency of CD107a + NK cells ( y ‐axis). Box plots display inhibition of degranulation after co‐culture with 721.221 target cells in the presence of either isotype or αDR4/5 as relative reduction compared to no antibody ( n = 9 different donors per condition). Data information: Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was performed using Bonferroni. Box plots represent the median and 25%/75% percentile. Whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Bar graphs represent the mean and the associated whiskers display the SD. Source data are available online for this figure.
Techniques Used: Co-Culture Assay, Comparison, Expressing, Control, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Inhibition, Infection
Figure Legend Snippet: Degranulation of primary human NK cells after incubation with plate‐coated antibodies or whole proteins. Comparison of CD107a expression after incubation in either uncoated wells (PBS) or wells coated with αTRAIL, αNKG2D, αNKp46, or isotype using flow cytometry ( n = 12 different donors per condition). Left panel: Concatenated density plot depicting CD107a expression as fluorescence intensity ( y ‐axis) for one representative donor and 10 µg/ml antibody concentration. Right panel: Box plots showing relative frequency of CD107a + NK cells ( y ‐axis) after incubation with plate‐coated antibodies of different concentrations ( x ‐axis). Comparison of CD107a expression after incubation with plate‐coated DR4 protein, DR5 protein, or human IgG using flow cytometry ( n = 11 different donors per condition). Left panel: Concatenated density plot depicting CD107a expression as fluorescence intensity ( y ‐axis) for one representative donor and 10 µg/ml protein concentration. Right panel: Box plots showing relative frequency of CD107a + NK cells ( y ‐axis) after incubation with plate‐coated proteins of different concentrations ( x ‐axis). Comparison of granzyme B release after incubation with various stimuli (10 µg/ml each). Box plots showing granzyme B concentration in the supernatant as determined by ELISA (left panel: n = 8 different donors per condition, right panel: n = 9 different donors per condition). Correlation analysis between relative frequency of CD107a + NK cells and granzyme B concentration ( n = 53, data points obtained from A, B, and C, 11 different donors). Comparison of CD107a expression after incubation with plate‐coated DcR1 protein, osteoprotegerin (OPG), or human IgG using flow cytometry ( n = 9 different donors). Box plots showing relative frequency of CD107a + NK cells ( y ‐axis) after incubation with plate‐coated proteins of different concentrations ( x ‐axis). Data information: Wilcoxon signed‐rank test adjusted for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni). Spearman rank analysis. (A, B, C, E) Each data point represents the mean of two technical replicates. Box plots represent the median and 25%/75% percentile. Whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Source data are available online for this figure.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Comparison, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Concentration Assay, Protein Concentration, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Lysis of different target cells in co‐culture with NK cells was quantified in various cytotoxicity assays. Left panel: Representative contour plots showing depletion of 721.221 target cells in the presence of NK cells. Middle panel: Percentage of target cells remaining ( y ‐axis) after co‐culture with NK cells in the presence of either αTRAIL or isotype control, in reference to target cells kept alone. Right panel: Box plots displaying difference in target cells remaining ( y ‐axis) between αTRAIL and isotype conditions displayed as p.p. ( n = 12 different donors). Each data point represents the mean of at least two technical replicates. Left panel: Representative contour plots showing the percentage of .221‐DR4/5KO (control) and .221‐Cas9 cells (target) in the presence or absence of NK cells. Middle panel: Ratio between .221‐DR4/5KO and .221‐Cas9 cells ( y ‐axis) in the presence or absence of NK cells. Right panel: Specific lysis of .221‐Cas9 cells displayed as percent ( n = 12 different donors). Each data point represents the mean of at least three technical replicates. Left panel: Representative contour plots showing the percentage of Raji‐pSIP (control) and Raji‐DR5 ++ (target) in the presence or absence of NK cells. Middle panel: Ratio between Raji‐pSIP and Raji‐DR5 ++ ( y ‐axis) in the presence or absence of NK cells. Right panel: Specific lysis of Raji‐DR5 ++ cells displayed as % ( n = 12 different donors). Each data point represents the mean of at least three technical replicates. Data information: Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Experiments were performed in four batches with three different donors each. “No NK” control samples served as a reference for all donors in each batch. Lines connect each data value of the NK cell condition with their designated “No NK” control. Box plots represent the median and 25%/75% percentile. Whiskers indicate minimum and maximum data points. Source data are available online for this figure.
Techniques Used: Lysis, Co-Culture Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: The expression of DR4 and DR5 was assessed by flow cytometry. 721.221 and Raji cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near‐IR Stain, followed by incubation with biotin‐conjugated mouse anti‐human DR4 or DR5, and then labeled with Streptavidin‐BV421. Expression was quantified as fluorescence intensity. Representative histogram of DR4 (light orange) and DR5 (dark orange) expression in comparison to the Streptavidin‐only control (grey) or the FMO control (dashed line). Upper panel (from left to right): untransduced 721.221 cells, Cas9‐transduced .221s, and DR4/5 double knockout .221s. Lower panel (from left to right): untransduced Raji cells, Raji cells transduced with an empty vector (pSIP), and Raji cells overexpressing DR5.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Labeling, Staining, Incubation, Fluorescence, Comparison, Control, Double Knockout, Transduction, Plasmid Preparation
Figure Legend Snippet:
Techniques Used: Generated, Recombinant, Control, Sequencing, Staining, Software, Selection, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Marker
Related Articles
Staining:Article Title: Serum-soluble TRAIL: a potential biomarker for disease activity in myositis patients. Article Snippet: Objectives Tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a member of the TNF super-family, which is involved in the regulation of immune response and pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, including polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM).. In this study, we examined the level and origin of serum-soluble TRAIL (sTRAIL) in patients with PM and DM and analyzed its association with disease activity and clinical features.. Method 11 PM patients, 33 DM patients, and 20 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. Expressing:Article Title: Loss of ADAM15 prevents necroptosis induction by partial RIPK1 degradation due to enhanced TNF-R1 surface expression and basal caspase-8 activation Article Snippet: After washing, the cells were resuspended in 150 μl PBS, and samples were measured using a Guava easyCyte (Cytek) and guavaSoft (4.5.25, Cytek) for data analysis. .. For the quantification of DR and ADAM15 surface expression, the following biotinylated antibodies were used, diluted 1:200 in PBS: CD120a/TNF-R1 (130–106–358, Miltenyi Biotec), other:Article Title: Engagement of TRAIL triggers degranulation and IFNγ production in human natural killer cells Article Snippet: |