accelerometer opal sensors  (APDM Wearable Technologies)

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review

doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065227

Figure Lengend Snippet: Equipment and technologies utilised in reviewed studies.

Article Snippet: Moore et al. (2017) [ ] Stroke patients n = 25. 4 F, 19 M 63 ± 11 y Reported by Martini et al. (2021) [ ] , Two min continuous walking at a self-selected pace around a 25 m track. Two testing sessions a week apart. 2 weeks continuous usage. Wearable accelerometer (AX3, Axivity, York, UK). GAITRite instrumented walkway (CIR systems, NJ, USA) (7.0 m × 0.6 m) One accelerometer placed on lumbar spine (Opal Sensors, APDM, Inc., Portland, OR, USA). Predefined acceptance ratings for ICCs were set at excellent (≥0.900), good (0.750–0.899), moderate (0.500–0.749) and poor (<0.500). , , AX3 vs. GAITRite; AX3 vs. Opal Sensor.

Techniques: Marker, Software, Sampling, Blocking Assay

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review

doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065227

Figure Lengend Snippet: Reliability articles cited in reviewed articles.

Article Snippet: Moore et al. (2017) [ ] Stroke patients n = 25. 4 F, 19 M 63 ± 11 y Reported by Martini et al. (2021) [ ] , Two min continuous walking at a self-selected pace around a 25 m track. Two testing sessions a week apart. 2 weeks continuous usage. Wearable accelerometer (AX3, Axivity, York, UK). GAITRite instrumented walkway (CIR systems, NJ, USA) (7.0 m × 0.6 m) One accelerometer placed on lumbar spine (Opal Sensors, APDM, Inc., Portland, OR, USA). Predefined acceptance ratings for ICCs were set at excellent (≥0.900), good (0.750–0.899), moderate (0.500–0.749) and poor (<0.500). , , AX3 vs. GAITRite; AX3 vs. Opal Sensor.

Techniques: