tnbc Search Results


96
AMS Biotechnology triple negative breast cancer
Triple Negative Breast Cancer, supplied by AMS Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/triple negative breast cancer/product/AMS Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
triple negative breast cancer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
AMS Biotechnology br1202b breast cancer tissue array
Fig. 2 Statistical analysis for heparanase immunohistochemistry comparing different breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. For the breast cancer tissue array and slides stained for heparanase: TNBC (n = 75), ER+/PR+ (n = 18), HER2+ (n = 14), normal (n = 4), and DCIS (n = 5), (A) images were taken of heparanase-stained AMSBIO <t>BR1202B</t> breast cancer tissue array and normal and DCIS slides on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (40×). (B) A one- way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in the H-scores of heparanase-stained cells among subtypes. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there was no significant difference: (C) in the percentage of heparanase positively stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (D) in the percentage of heparanase weakly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (E) in the percentage of heparanase moderately stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (F) in the percentage of heparanase strongly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes
Br1202b Breast Cancer Tissue Array, supplied by AMS Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/br1202b breast cancer tissue array/product/AMS Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
br1202b breast cancer tissue array - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Pantomics Inc tnbc tissue microarray brc964
Fig. 2 Statistical analysis for heparanase immunohistochemistry comparing different breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. For the breast cancer tissue array and slides stained for heparanase: TNBC (n = 75), ER+/PR+ (n = 18), HER2+ (n = 14), normal (n = 4), and DCIS (n = 5), (A) images were taken of heparanase-stained AMSBIO <t>BR1202B</t> breast cancer tissue array and normal and DCIS slides on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (40×). (B) A one- way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in the H-scores of heparanase-stained cells among subtypes. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there was no significant difference: (C) in the percentage of heparanase positively stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (D) in the percentage of heparanase weakly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (E) in the percentage of heparanase moderately stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (F) in the percentage of heparanase strongly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes
Tnbc Tissue Microarray Brc964, supplied by Pantomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tnbc tissue microarray brc964/product/Pantomics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tnbc tissue microarray brc964 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Jackson Laboratory tnbc-pdx tumors
Fig. 2 Statistical analysis for heparanase immunohistochemistry comparing different breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. For the breast cancer tissue array and slides stained for heparanase: TNBC (n = 75), ER+/PR+ (n = 18), HER2+ (n = 14), normal (n = 4), and DCIS (n = 5), (A) images were taken of heparanase-stained AMSBIO <t>BR1202B</t> breast cancer tissue array and normal and DCIS slides on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (40×). (B) A one- way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in the H-scores of heparanase-stained cells among subtypes. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there was no significant difference: (C) in the percentage of heparanase positively stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (D) in the percentage of heparanase weakly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (E) in the percentage of heparanase moderately stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (F) in the percentage of heparanase strongly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes
Tnbc Pdx Tumors, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tnbc-pdx tumors/product/Jackson Laboratory
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tnbc-pdx tumors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Chongqing Key nih3t3 fibroblast cell line
Fig. 2 Statistical analysis for heparanase immunohistochemistry comparing different breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. For the breast cancer tissue array and slides stained for heparanase: TNBC (n = 75), ER+/PR+ (n = 18), HER2+ (n = 14), normal (n = 4), and DCIS (n = 5), (A) images were taken of heparanase-stained AMSBIO <t>BR1202B</t> breast cancer tissue array and normal and DCIS slides on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (40×). (B) A one- way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in the H-scores of heparanase-stained cells among subtypes. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there was no significant difference: (C) in the percentage of heparanase positively stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (D) in the percentage of heparanase weakly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (E) in the percentage of heparanase moderately stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (F) in the percentage of heparanase strongly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes
Nih3t3 Fibroblast Cell Line, supplied by Chongqing Key, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nih3t3 fibroblast cell line/product/Chongqing Key
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nih3t3 fibroblast cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Anticancer Inc mdamb-231 breast cancer cells
Fig. 2 Statistical analysis for heparanase immunohistochemistry comparing different breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. For the breast cancer tissue array and slides stained for heparanase: TNBC (n = 75), ER+/PR+ (n = 18), HER2+ (n = 14), normal (n = 4), and DCIS (n = 5), (A) images were taken of heparanase-stained AMSBIO <t>BR1202B</t> breast cancer tissue array and normal and DCIS slides on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (40×). (B) A one- way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in the H-scores of heparanase-stained cells among subtypes. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there was no significant difference: (C) in the percentage of heparanase positively stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (D) in the percentage of heparanase weakly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (E) in the percentage of heparanase moderately stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (F) in the percentage of heparanase strongly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes
Mdamb 231 Breast Cancer Cells, supplied by Anticancer Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mdamb-231 breast cancer cells/product/Anticancer Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mdamb-231 breast cancer cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Taconic Biosciences eo771 cells
Plac1 expression and lentivirus-mediated reduction of Plac1 in <t>EO771</t> cells. ( a ) EO771 mouse mammary tumor cells expressed high levels of Plac1 in comparison to mouse placenta. ( b ) EO771 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing crambled RNA (Scr) or four Plac1 shRNAs designated sh81, sh187, sh300 and sh490; sh490 inhibited RNA expression >98%, and these cells were designated EO771/shPlac1. ( c ) EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were grown as monolayers, and the number of viable cells were quantified by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. The growth of EO771/shPlac1 cells differed significantly ( P < 0.001) from EO771/Scr cells by the two-sided Student’s t test. ( d ) qRT-PCR analysis of immune cell-related gene expression downregulated in EO771/shPlac1 cells. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. Significant differences between EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were obtained for CD274 ( P < 0.01), Plac1 ( P < 0.01), Cxcl1 ( P < 0.001), Ccl5 ( P < 0.001) and Lif ( P < 0.001) using the two-tailed Student’s t test; values for Ccl7 were not significantly different ( P > 0.05). ( e ) Heatmap of gene expression as determined by Affymetrix microarray analysis of EO771/Scr (Ctl) and EO771/shPlac1 (sh) cells. Shown are immune cell-related transcripts (Table ) representing ≥3.0-fold change in expression.
Eo771 Cells, supplied by Taconic Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eo771 cells/product/Taconic Biosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eo771 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Qiagen adnatest tnbc panel prototype
Plac1 expression and lentivirus-mediated reduction of Plac1 in <t>EO771</t> cells. ( a ) EO771 mouse mammary tumor cells expressed high levels of Plac1 in comparison to mouse placenta. ( b ) EO771 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing crambled RNA (Scr) or four Plac1 shRNAs designated sh81, sh187, sh300 and sh490; sh490 inhibited RNA expression >98%, and these cells were designated EO771/shPlac1. ( c ) EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were grown as monolayers, and the number of viable cells were quantified by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. The growth of EO771/shPlac1 cells differed significantly ( P < 0.001) from EO771/Scr cells by the two-sided Student’s t test. ( d ) qRT-PCR analysis of immune cell-related gene expression downregulated in EO771/shPlac1 cells. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. Significant differences between EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were obtained for CD274 ( P < 0.01), Plac1 ( P < 0.01), Cxcl1 ( P < 0.001), Ccl5 ( P < 0.001) and Lif ( P < 0.001) using the two-tailed Student’s t test; values for Ccl7 were not significantly different ( P > 0.05). ( e ) Heatmap of gene expression as determined by Affymetrix microarray analysis of EO771/Scr (Ctl) and EO771/shPlac1 (sh) cells. Shown are immune cell-related transcripts (Table ) representing ≥3.0-fold change in expression.
Adnatest Tnbc Panel Prototype, supplied by Qiagen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/adnatest tnbc panel prototype/product/Qiagen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
adnatest tnbc panel prototype - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GlobalData phase ii drugs for tnbc
Plac1 expression and lentivirus-mediated reduction of Plac1 in <t>EO771</t> cells. ( a ) EO771 mouse mammary tumor cells expressed high levels of Plac1 in comparison to mouse placenta. ( b ) EO771 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing crambled RNA (Scr) or four Plac1 shRNAs designated sh81, sh187, sh300 and sh490; sh490 inhibited RNA expression >98%, and these cells were designated EO771/shPlac1. ( c ) EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were grown as monolayers, and the number of viable cells were quantified by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. The growth of EO771/shPlac1 cells differed significantly ( P < 0.001) from EO771/Scr cells by the two-sided Student’s t test. ( d ) qRT-PCR analysis of immune cell-related gene expression downregulated in EO771/shPlac1 cells. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. Significant differences between EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were obtained for CD274 ( P < 0.01), Plac1 ( P < 0.01), Cxcl1 ( P < 0.001), Ccl5 ( P < 0.001) and Lif ( P < 0.001) using the two-tailed Student’s t test; values for Ccl7 were not significantly different ( P > 0.05). ( e ) Heatmap of gene expression as determined by Affymetrix microarray analysis of EO771/Scr (Ctl) and EO771/shPlac1 (sh) cells. Shown are immune cell-related transcripts (Table ) representing ≥3.0-fold change in expression.
Phase Ii Drugs For Tnbc, supplied by GlobalData, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/phase ii drugs for tnbc/product/GlobalData
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phase ii drugs for tnbc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
U.S Biomax Inc tnbc samples us biomax tma
a Representative images for LIMK2 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or triple-negative breast <t>cancer</t> <t>(TNBC)</t> samples in a tissue microarray <t>(TMA)</t> from US Biomax at ×20 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm. b (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA scored by LIMK2 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) Percentage of LIMK2-positive cells in TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%. Unpaired t -test with Welch’s correction was used to compare the LIMK2 expression between normal adjacent breast tissues and breast carcinoma. c Representative images for LIMK2 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or TNBC samples in three independent TNBC TMAs from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) at ×20 and ×40 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm for ×20 and 25 μm for ×40. d (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility scored by LIMK2 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) Percentage of LIMK2-positive cells in TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%). ** P < 0.01.
Tnbc Samples Us Biomax Tma, supplied by U.S Biomax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tnbc samples us biomax tma/product/U.S Biomax Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tnbc samples us biomax tma - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Innocrin Pharmaceuticals seviteronel cbr16 (female tnbc and male bc), cbr24 (female er+)
Clinical Trials for Male Breast Cancer or Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer Enrolling Men
Seviteronel Cbr16 (Female Tnbc And Male Bc), Cbr24 (Female Er+), supplied by Innocrin Pharmaceuticals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/seviteronel cbr16 (female tnbc and male bc), cbr24 (female er+)/product/Innocrin Pharmaceuticals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
seviteronel cbr16 (female tnbc and male bc), cbr24 (female er+) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
IDEXX 4175tr
Clinical Trials for Male Breast Cancer or Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer Enrolling Men
4175tr, supplied by IDEXX, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/4175tr/product/IDEXX
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
4175tr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 2 Statistical analysis for heparanase immunohistochemistry comparing different breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. For the breast cancer tissue array and slides stained for heparanase: TNBC (n = 75), ER+/PR+ (n = 18), HER2+ (n = 14), normal (n = 4), and DCIS (n = 5), (A) images were taken of heparanase-stained AMSBIO BR1202B breast cancer tissue array and normal and DCIS slides on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (40×). (B) A one- way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in the H-scores of heparanase-stained cells among subtypes. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there was no significant difference: (C) in the percentage of heparanase positively stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (D) in the percentage of heparanase weakly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (E) in the percentage of heparanase moderately stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (F) in the percentage of heparanase strongly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes

Journal: Breast cancer research : BCR

Article Title: The role of heparan sulfate in enhancing the chemotherapeutic response in triple-negative breast cancer.

doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01906-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2 Statistical analysis for heparanase immunohistochemistry comparing different breast cancer subtypes and normal breast tissue. For the breast cancer tissue array and slides stained for heparanase: TNBC (n = 75), ER+/PR+ (n = 18), HER2+ (n = 14), normal (n = 4), and DCIS (n = 5), (A) images were taken of heparanase-stained AMSBIO BR1202B breast cancer tissue array and normal and DCIS slides on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (40×). (B) A one- way ANOVA test indicated no significant difference in the H-scores of heparanase-stained cells among subtypes. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there was no significant difference: (C) in the percentage of heparanase positively stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (D) in the percentage of heparanase weakly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (E) in the percentage of heparanase moderately stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes; (F) in the percentage of heparanase strongly stained cells in the tissue sections of normal breast tissue, DCIS, and invasive breast cancer subtypes

Article Snippet: AMSBIO BR1202B breast cancer tissue array (120-core array with 82 TNBC cores) on Fisher Superfrost Plus slides was sectioned at 5 μm and air-dried overnight.

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Microscopy

Plac1 expression and lentivirus-mediated reduction of Plac1 in EO771 cells. ( a ) EO771 mouse mammary tumor cells expressed high levels of Plac1 in comparison to mouse placenta. ( b ) EO771 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing crambled RNA (Scr) or four Plac1 shRNAs designated sh81, sh187, sh300 and sh490; sh490 inhibited RNA expression >98%, and these cells were designated EO771/shPlac1. ( c ) EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were grown as monolayers, and the number of viable cells were quantified by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. The growth of EO771/shPlac1 cells differed significantly ( P < 0.001) from EO771/Scr cells by the two-sided Student’s t test. ( d ) qRT-PCR analysis of immune cell-related gene expression downregulated in EO771/shPlac1 cells. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. Significant differences between EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were obtained for CD274 ( P < 0.01), Plac1 ( P < 0.01), Cxcl1 ( P < 0.001), Ccl5 ( P < 0.001) and Lif ( P < 0.001) using the two-tailed Student’s t test; values for Ccl7 were not significantly different ( P > 0.05). ( e ) Heatmap of gene expression as determined by Affymetrix microarray analysis of EO771/Scr (Ctl) and EO771/shPlac1 (sh) cells. Shown are immune cell-related transcripts (Table ) representing ≥3.0-fold change in expression.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Plac1 Is a Key Regulator of the Inflammatory Response and Immune Tolerance In Mammary Tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24022-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Plac1 expression and lentivirus-mediated reduction of Plac1 in EO771 cells. ( a ) EO771 mouse mammary tumor cells expressed high levels of Plac1 in comparison to mouse placenta. ( b ) EO771 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing crambled RNA (Scr) or four Plac1 shRNAs designated sh81, sh187, sh300 and sh490; sh490 inhibited RNA expression >98%, and these cells were designated EO771/shPlac1. ( c ) EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were grown as monolayers, and the number of viable cells were quantified by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. The growth of EO771/shPlac1 cells differed significantly ( P < 0.001) from EO771/Scr cells by the two-sided Student’s t test. ( d ) qRT-PCR analysis of immune cell-related gene expression downregulated in EO771/shPlac1 cells. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis of three samples. Significant differences between EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells were obtained for CD274 ( P < 0.01), Plac1 ( P < 0.01), Cxcl1 ( P < 0.001), Ccl5 ( P < 0.001) and Lif ( P < 0.001) using the two-tailed Student’s t test; values for Ccl7 were not significantly different ( P > 0.05). ( e ) Heatmap of gene expression as determined by Affymetrix microarray analysis of EO771/Scr (Ctl) and EO771/shPlac1 (sh) cells. Shown are immune cell-related transcripts (Table ) representing ≥3.0-fold change in expression.

Article Snippet: EO771 cells at an inoculum of 1 × 10 6 cells/0.1 ml were injected into the no. 4 mammary gland of C57BL/6 or SCID mice (Taconic), and tumor growth was monitored daily.

Techniques: Expressing, Comparison, Transduction, RNA Expression, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Two Tailed Test, Microarray

Growth of EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells in syngeneic and SCID mice. ( a ) Syngeneic C57BL/6 mice or ( b ) SCID mice at five weeks of age, were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1 × 10 6 cells. Tumor size was measured by calipers in two dimensions. Tumor growth for EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells in syngeneic mice differed significantly (P = 0.040) by the unpaired Student’s t test. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in tumor growth between the two cell lines in SCID mice. Shown is the mean ± SD, N = 5 per group. ( c ) H&E staining and Plac1 IHC in isografts of EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells. Magnification 400X.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Plac1 Is a Key Regulator of the Inflammatory Response and Immune Tolerance In Mammary Tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24022-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Growth of EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells in syngeneic and SCID mice. ( a ) Syngeneic C57BL/6 mice or ( b ) SCID mice at five weeks of age, were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1 × 10 6 cells. Tumor size was measured by calipers in two dimensions. Tumor growth for EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells in syngeneic mice differed significantly (P = 0.040) by the unpaired Student’s t test. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in tumor growth between the two cell lines in SCID mice. Shown is the mean ± SD, N = 5 per group. ( c ) H&E staining and Plac1 IHC in isografts of EO771/Scr and EO771/shPlac1 cells. Magnification 400X.

Article Snippet: EO771 cells at an inoculum of 1 × 10 6 cells/0.1 ml were injected into the no. 4 mammary gland of C57BL/6 or SCID mice (Taconic), and tumor growth was monitored daily.

Techniques: Staining

Growth of EO771 cells in syngeneic mice following treatment with a Cxcr 2 antagonist. ( a ) Syngeneic 57BL/6 mice were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1 × 10 6 at five weeks of age, and injected i.p. daily with vehicle (blue) or 2 mg/kg (red) or 20 mg/kg (green) SB225002 beginning 11 days after cell inoculation. SB225002 completely suppressed tumor growth after 14 days. Differences between vehicle- and 2 mg/kg SB225002-treated mice were not significantly different (P = 0.145); differences between vehicle- and 20 mg/kg SB225002-treated mice were significantly different (P = 0.005) by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Shown is the mean ± SD, N = 5 per group. ( b ) Immune gene expression in tumors 17 days after treatment with 20 mg/kg SB225002. Shown is the relative expression in control and SB225002-treated mice in comparison to their changes in EO771/shPlac1 cells (Table ). ( c ) FACS analysis of immune cell tumor infiltrates in isografts after treatment with vehicle or SB225002 as in ( b ). SB225002 treatment reduced the percentage of immune cell tumor infiltrates of CD11b + /Gr-1 + myeloid-derived suppressor cells ( MDSC ) and Foxp3 + /CD25 + T cells ( Treg ), and increased the percentages of CD8 + /CD4 + T cells ( T) , CD3 + /NK1.1 + NK cells ( NK ) and F4/80 + /CD80/86 + macrophages ( Mϕ ) and CD11c + /CD80/86 + dendritic cells ( DC ). Numbers in parentheses ( ) represent the percentages of each cell population. ( d ) Bar graph represents the mean±SD of the percent distribution of immune cell tumor infiltrates as in ( c ); P values were determined by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, N = 4 per group. ( e ) CD8 + T cell infiltration determined by IHC in tumor isografts from vehicle-treated ( EO771/Ctl ) and SB225002-treated ( EO771/SB ) mice. Infiltration of CD8 + T cells increased after treatment with 20 mg/kg SB225002. Magnification 600X. ( f ) Macrophage ( F4/80 ) and Treg cell ( Foxp3 ) infiltration, Plac1 expression and apoptosis by cleaved caspase-3 expression ( Caspase ) in tumor isografts from vehicle-treated ( EO771/Ctl ) and SB225002-treated ( EO771/SB ) mice. Infiltration of macrophages and Treg cells were reduced and apoptosis was increased after treatment with 20 mg/kg SB225002. Magnification 400X

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Plac1 Is a Key Regulator of the Inflammatory Response and Immune Tolerance In Mammary Tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24022-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Growth of EO771 cells in syngeneic mice following treatment with a Cxcr 2 antagonist. ( a ) Syngeneic 57BL/6 mice were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1 × 10 6 at five weeks of age, and injected i.p. daily with vehicle (blue) or 2 mg/kg (red) or 20 mg/kg (green) SB225002 beginning 11 days after cell inoculation. SB225002 completely suppressed tumor growth after 14 days. Differences between vehicle- and 2 mg/kg SB225002-treated mice were not significantly different (P = 0.145); differences between vehicle- and 20 mg/kg SB225002-treated mice were significantly different (P = 0.005) by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Shown is the mean ± SD, N = 5 per group. ( b ) Immune gene expression in tumors 17 days after treatment with 20 mg/kg SB225002. Shown is the relative expression in control and SB225002-treated mice in comparison to their changes in EO771/shPlac1 cells (Table ). ( c ) FACS analysis of immune cell tumor infiltrates in isografts after treatment with vehicle or SB225002 as in ( b ). SB225002 treatment reduced the percentage of immune cell tumor infiltrates of CD11b + /Gr-1 + myeloid-derived suppressor cells ( MDSC ) and Foxp3 + /CD25 + T cells ( Treg ), and increased the percentages of CD8 + /CD4 + T cells ( T) , CD3 + /NK1.1 + NK cells ( NK ) and F4/80 + /CD80/86 + macrophages ( Mϕ ) and CD11c + /CD80/86 + dendritic cells ( DC ). Numbers in parentheses ( ) represent the percentages of each cell population. ( d ) Bar graph represents the mean±SD of the percent distribution of immune cell tumor infiltrates as in ( c ); P values were determined by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, N = 4 per group. ( e ) CD8 + T cell infiltration determined by IHC in tumor isografts from vehicle-treated ( EO771/Ctl ) and SB225002-treated ( EO771/SB ) mice. Infiltration of CD8 + T cells increased after treatment with 20 mg/kg SB225002. Magnification 600X. ( f ) Macrophage ( F4/80 ) and Treg cell ( Foxp3 ) infiltration, Plac1 expression and apoptosis by cleaved caspase-3 expression ( Caspase ) in tumor isografts from vehicle-treated ( EO771/Ctl ) and SB225002-treated ( EO771/SB ) mice. Infiltration of macrophages and Treg cells were reduced and apoptosis was increased after treatment with 20 mg/kg SB225002. Magnification 400X

Article Snippet: EO771 cells at an inoculum of 1 × 10 6 cells/0.1 ml were injected into the no. 4 mammary gland of C57BL/6 or SCID mice (Taconic), and tumor growth was monitored daily.

Techniques: Injection, Two Tailed Test, Gene Expression, Expressing, Control, Comparison, Derivative Assay

Lentivirus-mediated reduction of Cxcl1 in EO771 cells. ( a ) EO771 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing scrambled RNA (Scr) or three Cxcl1 shRNAs designated sh118, sh174, sh218; sh174 inhibited RNA expression >99% (EO771/shCxcl1). ( b ) EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells were grown as monolayers, and the number of viable cells were determined by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis from three samples, which were significantly different ( P < 0.001) by the two-tailed Student’s t test. ( c ) Growth of EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells in syngeneic mice. Mice at five weeks of age were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1x10 6 cells, and tumor size was measured by calipers in two dimensions. Differences in tumor growth between EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells were significantly different (P = 0.006) by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test; N = 5. ( d ) qRT-PCR analysis of genes downregulated in EO771/shCxcl1 cells. Shown is the mean ± SD of triplicate analysis of 3 samples. Significant differences between EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells were obtained for Plau ( P < 0.02), C3 ( P < 0.01), Ly6a ( P < 0.01), Ccl7 ( P < 0.001) and Il23a ( P < 0.01) by the two-sided Student’s t test; differences for CD68 were not significantly different ( P > 0.05).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Plac1 Is a Key Regulator of the Inflammatory Response and Immune Tolerance In Mammary Tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24022-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lentivirus-mediated reduction of Cxcl1 in EO771 cells. ( a ) EO771 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing scrambled RNA (Scr) or three Cxcl1 shRNAs designated sh118, sh174, sh218; sh174 inhibited RNA expression >99% (EO771/shCxcl1). ( b ) EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells were grown as monolayers, and the number of viable cells were determined by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate analysis from three samples, which were significantly different ( P < 0.001) by the two-tailed Student’s t test. ( c ) Growth of EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells in syngeneic mice. Mice at five weeks of age were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1x10 6 cells, and tumor size was measured by calipers in two dimensions. Differences in tumor growth between EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells were significantly different (P = 0.006) by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test; N = 5. ( d ) qRT-PCR analysis of genes downregulated in EO771/shCxcl1 cells. Shown is the mean ± SD of triplicate analysis of 3 samples. Significant differences between EO771/Scr and EO771/shCxcl1 cells were obtained for Plau ( P < 0.02), C3 ( P < 0.01), Ly6a ( P < 0.01), Ccl7 ( P < 0.001) and Il23a ( P < 0.01) by the two-sided Student’s t test; differences for CD68 were not significantly different ( P > 0.05).

Article Snippet: EO771 cells at an inoculum of 1 × 10 6 cells/0.1 ml were injected into the no. 4 mammary gland of C57BL/6 or SCID mice (Taconic), and tumor growth was monitored daily.

Techniques: Transduction, Expressing, RNA Expression, Staining, Two Tailed Test, Quantitative RT-PCR

Expression of immune-related genes in E0771/shCxcl1 cells. Shown are ≥3-fold changes in gene expression with a raw score ≥300 in  EO771/shCxcl1  or E0771/Scr cells.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Plac1 Is a Key Regulator of the Inflammatory Response and Immune Tolerance In Mammary Tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24022-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of immune-related genes in E0771/shCxcl1 cells. Shown are ≥3-fold changes in gene expression with a raw score ≥300 in EO771/shCxcl1 or E0771/Scr cells.

Article Snippet: EO771 cells at an inoculum of 1 × 10 6 cells/0.1 ml were injected into the no. 4 mammary gland of C57BL/6 or SCID mice (Taconic), and tumor growth was monitored daily.

Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression

Gene expression common to  EO771/shPlac1  and EO771/shCxcl1 cells. Shown is the ratio between  EO771/shPlac1  or EO771/shCxcl1 cells to EO771/Scr control cells for genes with ≥3.0-fold changes in expression and a raw score ≥300.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Plac1 Is a Key Regulator of the Inflammatory Response and Immune Tolerance In Mammary Tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24022-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gene expression common to EO771/shPlac1 and EO771/shCxcl1 cells. Shown is the ratio between EO771/shPlac1 or EO771/shCxcl1 cells to EO771/Scr control cells for genes with ≥3.0-fold changes in expression and a raw score ≥300.

Article Snippet: EO771 cells at an inoculum of 1 × 10 6 cells/0.1 ml were injected into the no. 4 mammary gland of C57BL/6 or SCID mice (Taconic), and tumor growth was monitored daily.

Techniques: Gene Expression, Control, Expressing

Cxcl1 rescue of EO771/sh490 cells. ( a ) EO771/Scr and EO771/sh490 cells expressing eGFP were transduced with a lentivirus expressing Cxcl1 and mCherry, and selected for 35 days in 3.5 mg/ml G418. The merged photo shows cells co-expressing eGFP and mCherry (yellow). Magnification 200X. ( b ) qRT-PCR for Plac1 and Cxcl1 in EO771/Scr, EO771/sh490 and EO771/sh490/Cxcl1 cells. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate determinations.( c ) EO771/sh490/Cxcl1 cells were grown in 96-well plates at an initial density of 5,000 cells per well in media supplemented with 3.5 mg/ml G418. Cell density was determined by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. ( d ) Syngeneic C57BL/6 mice were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1 × 10 6 at five weeks of age. There was a significant difference in the growth EO771/sh490 cells (P = 0.021) and EO771/sh490/Cxcl1 cells (P = 0.034) vs. EO771/Scr cells by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Shown is the mean ± SD, N=6 per group.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Plac1 Is a Key Regulator of the Inflammatory Response and Immune Tolerance In Mammary Tumorigenesis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24022-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cxcl1 rescue of EO771/sh490 cells. ( a ) EO771/Scr and EO771/sh490 cells expressing eGFP were transduced with a lentivirus expressing Cxcl1 and mCherry, and selected for 35 days in 3.5 mg/ml G418. The merged photo shows cells co-expressing eGFP and mCherry (yellow). Magnification 200X. ( b ) qRT-PCR for Plac1 and Cxcl1 in EO771/Scr, EO771/sh490 and EO771/sh490/Cxcl1 cells. Shown is the mean ± S.D. of triplicate determinations.( c ) EO771/sh490/Cxcl1 cells were grown in 96-well plates at an initial density of 5,000 cells per well in media supplemented with 3.5 mg/ml G418. Cell density was determined by sulforhodamine B staining. Shown is the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. ( d ) Syngeneic C57BL/6 mice were inoculated in the mammary gland with 1 × 10 6 at five weeks of age. There was a significant difference in the growth EO771/sh490 cells (P = 0.021) and EO771/sh490/Cxcl1 cells (P = 0.034) vs. EO771/Scr cells by the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Shown is the mean ± SD, N=6 per group.

Article Snippet: EO771 cells at an inoculum of 1 × 10 6 cells/0.1 ml were injected into the no. 4 mammary gland of C57BL/6 or SCID mice (Taconic), and tumor growth was monitored daily.

Techniques: Expressing, Transduction, Quantitative RT-PCR, Staining, Two Tailed Test

a Representative images for LIMK2 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) samples in a tissue microarray (TMA) from US Biomax at ×20 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm. b (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA scored by LIMK2 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) Percentage of LIMK2-positive cells in TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%. Unpaired t -test with Welch’s correction was used to compare the LIMK2 expression between normal adjacent breast tissues and breast carcinoma. c Representative images for LIMK2 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or TNBC samples in three independent TNBC TMAs from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) at ×20 and ×40 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm for ×20 and 25 μm for ×40. d (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility scored by LIMK2 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) Percentage of LIMK2-positive cells in TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%). ** P < 0.01.

Journal: Oncogenesis

Article Title: LIMK2 promotes the metastatic progression of triple-negative breast cancer by activating SRPK1

doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-00263-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Representative images for LIMK2 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) samples in a tissue microarray (TMA) from US Biomax at ×20 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm. b (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA scored by LIMK2 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) Percentage of LIMK2-positive cells in TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%. Unpaired t -test with Welch’s correction was used to compare the LIMK2 expression between normal adjacent breast tissues and breast carcinoma. c Representative images for LIMK2 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or TNBC samples in three independent TNBC TMAs from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) at ×20 and ×40 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm for ×20 and 25 μm for ×40. d (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility scored by LIMK2 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) Percentage of LIMK2-positive cells in TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from Yale Tissue Microarray Facility: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%). ** P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: Scale bar, 50 μm for ×20 and 25 μm for ×40. b (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA scored based on SRPK1 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) percentage of SRPK1-positive cells in TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%.

Techniques: Expressing, Microarray, Staining

a Representative images for SRPK1 expression analysis in normal breast tissue and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) samples on a tissue microarray (TMA) from US Biomax at 20× and 40× magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm for ×20 and 25 μm for ×40. b (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA scored based on SRPK1 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) percentage of SRPK1-positive cells in TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%. Unpaired t -test with Welch’s correction was used to compare the SRPK1 expression between normal adjacent breast tissues and breast carcinoma. c Representative images for SRPK1 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs from the Yale Tissue Microarray Facility (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) at ×20 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm. d (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from the Yale Tissue Microarray Facility scored by SRPK1 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) percentage of SRPK1-positive cells in TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from the Yale Tissue Microarray Facility: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%. **** P < 0.0001.

Journal: Oncogenesis

Article Title: LIMK2 promotes the metastatic progression of triple-negative breast cancer by activating SRPK1

doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-00263-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Representative images for SRPK1 expression analysis in normal breast tissue and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) samples on a tissue microarray (TMA) from US Biomax at 20× and 40× magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm for ×20 and 25 μm for ×40. b (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA scored based on SRPK1 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) percentage of SRPK1-positive cells in TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%. Unpaired t -test with Welch’s correction was used to compare the SRPK1 expression between normal adjacent breast tissues and breast carcinoma. c Representative images for SRPK1 expression analysis in normal breast tissue or TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs from the Yale Tissue Microarray Facility (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) at ×20 magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm. d (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from the Yale Tissue Microarray Facility scored by SRPK1 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) percentage of SRPK1-positive cells in TNBC samples from three independent TNBC TMAs (YTMA311, YTMA341, and YTMA347) from the Yale Tissue Microarray Facility: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%. **** P < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Scale bar, 50 μm for ×20 and 25 μm for ×40. b (Left) Relative fraction of TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA scored based on SRPK1 staining intensity: 0, no staining (not shown); +1, weak; +2, moderate; or +3, high. (Right) percentage of SRPK1-positive cells in TNBC samples from US Biomax TMA: 0–25%, 25–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100%.

Techniques: Expressing, Microarray, Staining

Clinical Trials for Male Breast Cancer or Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer Enrolling Men

Journal: Breast cancer research and treatment

Article Title: Male breast cancer: a disease distinct from female breast cancer

doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4921-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical Trials for Male Breast Cancer or Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer Enrolling Men

Article Snippet: Clinical trials are organized by intervention, with a focus on male BC (i.e., solely male BC subjects or separate male BC cohort if enrolling female BC subjects), observational male BC, or interventional that specifically mention combined enrollment of male and female subjects. table ft1 table-wrap mode="anchored" t5 caption a7 NCT Number / Study Type Status Population Total N (Male BC N) Arms Primary Endpoint Sponsor Interventional Trial – Male BC Focus NCT01638247 / open-label Phase 3 Ongoing, not recruiting Men only, hormone receptor +, 56 (56) Tamoxifen, tamoxifen + GnRH analogue, exemestane + GnRH analogue Estradiol blood concentration German Breast Group NCT00217659 / open-label Phase 2 Withdrawn due to low accrual and site logistics [ 1 ] Men only, recurrent or metastatic or recurrent BC, ER+ or PR+ 0 Anastrozole + goserelin acetate PFS, OS, ORR Southwest Oncology Group NCT02580448 / open-label Phase 1/2 Actively recruiting Men and postmenopausal women; Phase 1: women only, TNBC or ER+ / Phase 2: TNBC, AR+ or ER+ 175 (21) Seviteronel CBR16 (female TNBC and male BC), CBR24 (female ER+) Innocrin Pharmaceuticals Non-interventional – Male BC Focus NCT01703520 / Register-based, case-control Completed Nov 2017 Men only with or without male BC, > 35 yrs old, finasteride users or non-users 575,216 (575,216) N/A Association between finasteride exposure and the development of breast cancer in men.

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Mutagenesis