Journal: Cell Death & Disease

Article Title: Targeting ENO1 reprograms macrophage polarization to trigger antitumor immunity and improves the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy

doi: 10.1038/s41419-026-08416-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A The expression of total and surface ENO1 in human CRC cell lines was evaluated by immunoblotting and flow cytometry. B The expression of total and surface ENO1 in human BRCA cell lines was evaluated by immunoblotting and flow cytometry. C HT29 and LoVo cells were treated with different doses of recombinant human TGFβ1 protein (rhTGFβ1) for 24 hr, after which surface ENO1 expression was analyzed via flow cytometry. D HS578T and MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with different doses of the rhTGFβ1 protein for 24 hr, after which the surface ENO1 level was analyzed via flow cytometry. E LoVo cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL), rhTGFβ1 protein (10 ng/mL) or H 2 O 2 (50 μM) in combination with a PRMT5 inhibitor (AMG-193, 1 μM) or a PRMT6 inhibitor (EPZ020411 hydrochloride, 1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface ENO1 level was analyzed via flow cytometry. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). F HT29 cells were treated with rhTGFβ1 protein in combination with a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface ENO1 expression was analyzed via flow cytometry. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). G LoVo shNC and LoVo shPRMT5 cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL), rhTGFβ1 protein (10 ng/mL) or H 2 O 2 (50 μM) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). H HT29 and LoVo cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) and RT (5 Gy) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). I HT29 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). J HT29 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The level of plasmin activity was examined via an ELISA kit. * p < 0.05. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). K MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The surface level of ENO1 was examined by flow cytometry. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). L MDA-MB-468 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a TGFβR1 inhibitor (1 μM), a Smad3 inhibitor (1 μM), or a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The level of plasmin activity was examined via an ELISA kit. * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01. One-Way ANOVA test ( n = 3). M HT29 cells were treated with RT (5 Gy) in combination with a PRMT5 inhibitor (1 μM) for 24 hr. The level of surface-methylated ENO1 was evaluated by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting.

Article Snippet: The TGFβR1 inhibitor galunisertib (HY-13226, MCE, USA) [ ], Smad3 inhibitor SIS3 (HY-13013, MCE, USA) and PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ015666 (HY-12727, MCE, USA) were dissolved in DMSO to a concentration of 10 mM.

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Recombinant, Activity Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Methylation, Immunoprecipitation