Review





Similar Products

custom frozen reference bmd panels  (Thermo Fisher)
90
Thermo Fisher custom frozen reference bmd panels
Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to <t>BMD,</t> all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for <t>each</t> <t>antimicrobial,</t> testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.
Custom Frozen Reference Bmd Panels, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom frozen reference bmd panels/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom frozen reference bmd panels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
reference bmd panels  (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute)
90
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference bmd panels
Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to <t>BMD,</t> all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for <t>each</t> <t>antimicrobial,</t> testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.
Reference Bmd Panels, supplied by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/reference bmd panels/product/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
reference bmd panels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
96-well frozen reference broth microdilution (bmd) panels in cation-adjusted mueller-hinton broth (camhb)  (Thermo Fisher)
90
Thermo Fisher 96-well frozen reference broth microdilution (bmd) panels in cation-adjusted mueller-hinton broth (camhb)
Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to <t>BMD,</t> all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for <t>each</t> <t>antimicrobial,</t> testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.
96 Well Frozen Reference Broth Microdilution (Bmd) Panels In Cation Adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (Camhb), supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/96-well frozen reference broth microdilution (bmd) panels in cation-adjusted mueller-hinton broth (camhb)/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
96-well frozen reference broth microdilution (bmd) panels in cation-adjusted mueller-hinton broth (camhb) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Article Title: Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis

doi: 10.1128/jcm.01480-24

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, all BCC isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

Article Snippet: For CF isolates, testing was performed from June 2022 to December 2022 using custom frozen reference BMD panels prepared by ThermoFisher with the same antimicrobial dilution ranges as listed above.

Techniques: Comparison

Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, CF vs non-CF isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant, and values <0.05 are highlighted red in the table. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Article Title: Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates from people with and without cystic fibrosis

doi: 10.1128/jcm.01480-24

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of error rates for CAZ, LVX, MEM, MIN, and TMP-SMX DD as compared to BMD, CF vs non-CF isolates. VMEs, MEs, and MIs for DD compared to BMD were summed for assays performed on three MHA brands (Remel, HD, and BD). The table summarizes χ 2 analyses for each antimicrobial, testing whether errors are under- or over-represented for DD performed on three different MHA brands. P -value <0.05 was considered significant, and values <0.05 are highlighted red in the table. Blue, agreement between methods; red, error between methods. #, number.

Article Snippet: For CF isolates, testing was performed from June 2022 to December 2022 using custom frozen reference BMD panels prepared by ThermoFisher with the same antimicrobial dilution ranges as listed above.

Techniques: Comparison