Review





Similar Products

94
ABclonal Biotechnology rbfox1
Rbfox1, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rbfox1/RBFOX1+Rabbit+pAb/pm42485912-161-9-10
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rbfox1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ABclonal Biotechnology mouse anti ecad
Mouse Anti Ecad, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rbfox1/RBFOX1+Rabbit+pAb/pm42385712-366-45-47
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti ecad - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Novus Biologicals rabbit anti rbfox1
Rabbit Anti Rbfox1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rbfox1/A2BP1+Antibody/pm41928095-110-1-4
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti rbfox1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals novus anti rbfox1 antibody
Novus Anti Rbfox1 Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rbfox1/A2BP1+Antibody+(OTI4F9)/pm41928095-447-35-35
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
novus anti rbfox1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc rbfox1 transgenic mice human rbfox1 cdna
Rbfox1 Transgenic Mice Human Rbfox1 Cdna, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rbfox1/pENTR-A2BP1+(Plasmid+%2316176)/pm41928095-78-2-10
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rbfox1 transgenic mice human rbfox1 cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Jackson Laboratory rbfox1
( A ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate control and Vav1-cre ; <t>Rbfox1</t> fl/fl mice. ( B to D ) Cellularity (B), HSC frequency (C), and HSC number (D) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( E ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from control or Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 7 recipients for control and n = 6 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( F ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( G to I ) Cellularity (G), HSC frequency (H), and HSC number (I) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from littermate control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( J to L ) Relative fold changes of cellularity (J), HSC frequency (K), and HSC number (L) in the bone marrow of Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding littermate Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. ( M ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control or littermate Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 8 recipients for control and n = 9 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( N ) Relative fold changes of overall reconstitution 16 weeks after transplantation by bone marrow cells from Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. Data are means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Statistical analyses were performed with t test in (B) to (D), (G) to (L), and (N), and with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test in (E) and (M). The diagrams in (A) and (F) were created using BioRender. L. Gao (2025); https://BioRender.com/f3aye8s .
Rbfox1, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rbfox1/rbfox1fl/pmc12674123-181-4-16
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rbfox1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Human Protein Atlas rbfox1 summary
( A ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate control and Vav1-cre ; <t>Rbfox1</t> fl/fl mice. ( B to D ) Cellularity (B), HSC frequency (C), and HSC number (D) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( E ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from control or Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 7 recipients for control and n = 6 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( F ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( G to I ) Cellularity (G), HSC frequency (H), and HSC number (I) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from littermate control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( J to L ) Relative fold changes of cellularity (J), HSC frequency (K), and HSC number (L) in the bone marrow of Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding littermate Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. ( M ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control or littermate Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 8 recipients for control and n = 9 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( N ) Relative fold changes of overall reconstitution 16 weeks after transplantation by bone marrow cells from Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. Data are means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Statistical analyses were performed with t test in (B) to (D), (G) to (L), and (N), and with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test in (E) and (M). The diagrams in (A) and (F) were created using BioRender. L. Gao (2025); https://BioRender.com/f3aye8s .
Rbfox1 Summary, supplied by Human Protein Atlas, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rbfox1/rbfox1+summary/pm41261149-544-4-9
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rbfox1 summary - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( B to D ) Cellularity (B), HSC frequency (C), and HSC number (D) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( E ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from control or Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 7 recipients for control and n = 6 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( F ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( G to I ) Cellularity (G), HSC frequency (H), and HSC number (I) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from littermate control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( J to L ) Relative fold changes of cellularity (J), HSC frequency (K), and HSC number (L) in the bone marrow of Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding littermate Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. ( M ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control or littermate Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 8 recipients for control and n = 9 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( N ) Relative fold changes of overall reconstitution 16 weeks after transplantation by bone marrow cells from Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. Data are means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Statistical analyses were performed with t test in (B) to (D), (G) to (L), and (N), and with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test in (E) and (M). The diagrams in (A) and (F) were created using BioRender. L. Gao (2025); https://BioRender.com/f3aye8s .

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Rbfox2 selectively governs hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal by regulating proteostasis

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aea7451

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( B to D ) Cellularity (B), HSC frequency (C), and HSC number (D) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( E ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from control or Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 7 recipients for control and n = 6 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl mice. ( F ) Schematic diagram showing the generation of littermate Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( G to I ) Cellularity (G), HSC frequency (H), and HSC number (I) in the bone marrow of one hindlimb from littermate control and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( J to L ) Relative fold changes of cellularity (J), HSC frequency (K), and HSC number (L) in the bone marrow of Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding littermate Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. ( M ) Donor-derived blood cells in recipients transplanted with bone marrow cells from Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl control or littermate Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice, along with competitor cells. Two pairs of donor mice were used. A total of n = 8 recipients for control and n = 9 recipients for Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. ( N ) Relative fold changes of overall reconstitution 16 weeks after transplantation by bone marrow cells from Vav1-cre ; Rbfox2 fl/fl and Vav1-cre ; Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl mice. Fold changes were normalized to corresponding Rbfox2 fl/fl and Rbfox1 fl/fl ; Rbfox2 fl/fl controls, respectively. Data are means ± SEM. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Statistical analyses were performed with t test in (B) to (D), (G) to (L), and (N), and with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test in (E) and (M). The diagrams in (A) and (F) were created using BioRender. L. Gao (2025); https://BioRender.com/f3aye8s .

Article Snippet: Vav1-cre , Mx1-cre , Rbfox1 fl , and Rbfox2 fl ( ) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and maintained on C57BL/6 background.

Techniques: Control, Derivative Assay, Transplantation Assay