Review





Similar Products

97
ATCC ms2 coliphage
Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatment at 7 (A, C, E, G) and 70 mJ/cm 2 (B, D, F, H), the log reductions of hNoV strains (GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.4 Sydney[P16] and GII.17[P31]) and surrogates (TV and <t>MS2)</t> through infectivity assays, RT-qPCR, LR-RT-qPCR and RNase-RT-qPCR. For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each strain, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant). The letters above each column represents the differences among each UV treatment group, lowercase letters for UV 222, capital letters for UV 254. The log reductions with different letters suggest statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05), while those with the same letters indicate not significantly different ( p > 0.05).
Ms2 Coliphage, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ms2 coliphage/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ms2 coliphage - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ATCC coliphage ms2
Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatment at 7 (A, C, E, G) and 70 mJ/cm 2 (B, D, F, H), the log reductions of hNoV strains (GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.4 Sydney[P16] and GII.17[P31]) and surrogates (TV and <t>MS2)</t> through infectivity assays, RT-qPCR, LR-RT-qPCR and RNase-RT-qPCR. For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each strain, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant). The letters above each column represents the differences among each UV treatment group, lowercase letters for UV 222, capital letters for UV 254. The log reductions with different letters suggest statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05), while those with the same letters indicate not significantly different ( p > 0.05).
Coliphage Ms2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coliphage ms2/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coliphage ms2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Qingdao Hope Bio coliphage ms2 semisolid medium
Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatment at 7 (A, C, E, G) and 70 mJ/cm 2 (B, D, F, H), the log reductions of hNoV strains (GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.4 Sydney[P16] and GII.17[P31]) and surrogates (TV and <t>MS2)</t> through infectivity assays, RT-qPCR, LR-RT-qPCR and RNase-RT-qPCR. For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each strain, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant). The letters above each column represents the differences among each UV treatment group, lowercase letters for UV 222, capital letters for UV 254. The log reductions with different letters suggest statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05), while those with the same letters indicate not significantly different ( p > 0.05).
Coliphage Ms2 Semisolid Medium, supplied by Qingdao Hope Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coliphage ms2 semisolid medium/product/Qingdao Hope Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coliphage ms2 semisolid medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Qingdao Hope Bio coliphage ms2 liquid medium
Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatment at 7 (A, C, E, G) and 70 mJ/cm 2 (B, D, F, H), the log reductions of hNoV strains (GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.4 Sydney[P16] and GII.17[P31]) and surrogates (TV and <t>MS2)</t> through infectivity assays, RT-qPCR, LR-RT-qPCR and RNase-RT-qPCR. For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each strain, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant). The letters above each column represents the differences among each UV treatment group, lowercase letters for UV 222, capital letters for UV 254. The log reductions with different letters suggest statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05), while those with the same letters indicate not significantly different ( p > 0.05).
Coliphage Ms2 Liquid Medium, supplied by Qingdao Hope Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coliphage ms2 liquid medium/product/Qingdao Hope Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coliphage ms2 liquid medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ATCC f specific rna coliphage ms2
Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatment at 7 (A, C, E, G) and 70 mJ/cm 2 (B, D, F, H), the log reductions of hNoV strains (GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.4 Sydney[P16] and GII.17[P31]) and surrogates (TV and <t>MS2)</t> through infectivity assays, RT-qPCR, LR-RT-qPCR and RNase-RT-qPCR. For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each strain, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant). The letters above each column represents the differences among each UV treatment group, lowercase letters for UV 222, capital letters for UV 254. The log reductions with different letters suggest statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05), while those with the same letters indicate not significantly different ( p > 0.05).
F Specific Rna Coliphage Ms2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/f specific rna coliphage ms2/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
f specific rna coliphage ms2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatment at 7 (A, C, E, G) and 70 mJ/cm 2 (B, D, F, H), the log reductions of hNoV strains (GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.4 Sydney[P16] and GII.17[P31]) and surrogates (TV and MS2) through infectivity assays, RT-qPCR, LR-RT-qPCR and RNase-RT-qPCR. For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each strain, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant). The letters above each column represents the differences among each UV treatment group, lowercase letters for UV 222, capital letters for UV 254. The log reductions with different letters suggest statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05), while those with the same letters indicate not significantly different ( p > 0.05).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A comprehensive evaluation of ultraviolet irradiation at 254 nm and 222 nm in inactivating human noroviruses on surfaces

doi: 10.64898/2025.12.18.695136

Figure Lengend Snippet: Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatment at 7 (A, C, E, G) and 70 mJ/cm 2 (B, D, F, H), the log reductions of hNoV strains (GII.2[P16], GII.3[P12], GII.4 Sydney[P16] and GII.17[P31]) and surrogates (TV and MS2) through infectivity assays, RT-qPCR, LR-RT-qPCR and RNase-RT-qPCR. For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each strain, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant). The letters above each column represents the differences among each UV treatment group, lowercase letters for UV 222, capital letters for UV 254. The log reductions with different letters suggest statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05), while those with the same letters indicate not significantly different ( p > 0.05).

Article Snippet: Escherichia coli 15579 and MS2 coliphage ( E. coli bacteriophage 15597-B1TM) were both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison

Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatments at 70 mJ/cm 2 , the log reductions of hNoV GII.17[P31] LR-RT-qPCR results and MS2 infectivity in hydrated or dried forms, as well as in hydrated vomitus on stainless steel surfaces (A and C) and on porcine ear skin (B and D). For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each treatment and each state of virus, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A comprehensive evaluation of ultraviolet irradiation at 254 nm and 222 nm in inactivating human noroviruses on surfaces

doi: 10.64898/2025.12.18.695136

Figure Lengend Snippet: Under UV 222 and UV 254 treatments at 70 mJ/cm 2 , the log reductions of hNoV GII.17[P31] LR-RT-qPCR results and MS2 infectivity in hydrated or dried forms, as well as in hydrated vomitus on stainless steel surfaces (A and C) and on porcine ear skin (B and D). For pairwise comparison of UV treatment within each treatment and each state of virus, differences are expressed as * ( p < 0.05), ** ( p < 0.01), *** ( p < 0.001), ns (not significant).

Article Snippet: Escherichia coli 15579 and MS2 coliphage ( E. coli bacteriophage 15597-B1TM) were both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Infection, Comparison, Virus

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A comprehensive evaluation of ultraviolet irradiation at 254 nm and 222 nm in inactivating human noroviruses on surfaces

doi: 10.64898/2025.12.18.695136

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Escherichia coli 15579 and MS2 coliphage ( E. coli bacteriophage 15597-B1TM) were both obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: