Review





Similar Products

96
Sartorius AG jetmessenger mrna transfection
Jetmessenger Mrna Transfection, supplied by Sartorius AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/jetMESSENGER+mRNA+Transfection/custom%40jetmessenger_mrna_transfection%4010%2E64898%2F2026%2E08%2E26%2E747229
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
jetmessenger mrna transfection - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Mirus Bio transit -mrna
Transit Mrna, supplied by Mirus Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/TransIT+-mRNA/custom%40mir-2225%4042575252
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transit -mrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher dynabeads mrna direct micro kit
Dynabeads Mrna Direct Micro Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/nct04488614-6-12-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dynabeads mrna direct micro kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
MedChemExpress slc1a5 mrna
High <t>SLC1A5</t> expression is associated with poor prognosis and promotes proliferation via glutamine accumulation in GC. (A) Venn diagram representing the overlap between DEGs (transcriptomic) and DEPs (proteomics). (B, C) Heatmaps displaying the expression patterns of the 30 hub genes at the transcriptomic (B) and proteomic (C) levels. (D, E) qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and Western blot analysis (E) of SLC1A5 expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (F, G) qRT‐PCR analysis (F) and Western blot analysis (G) of SLC1A5 expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. (H) Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images and quantification of SLC1A5 in GC tissues and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues from the in‐house cohort. Scale bar: 50 µm. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to SLC1A5 expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (J, K) Colony formation (J) and EdU staining (K) assays in SLC1A5 knockdown AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm. (L, M) Intracellular glutamine concentration (L) and glutamine concentration of the cell culture supernatant (M) in AGS and MKN‐45 cells after SLC1A5 knockdown. n = 3. (N) Viability effect of glutamine in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN‐45 cells. Half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) values are indicated. n = 3. (O, P) Colony formation (O) and EdU staining (P) assays of SLC1A5‐overexpressing cells under normal (2 mM) or reduced (1 mM) glutamine conditions. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Slc1a5 Mrna, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/MPZL1%2C+Human/pmc13430941-445-3-16
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
slc1a5 mrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna mrna 3927
High <t>SLC1A5</t> expression is associated with poor prognosis and promotes proliferation via glutamine accumulation in GC. (A) Venn diagram representing the overlap between DEGs (transcriptomic) and DEPs (proteomics). (B, C) Heatmaps displaying the expression patterns of the 30 hub genes at the transcriptomic (B) and proteomic (C) levels. (D, E) qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and Western blot analysis (E) of SLC1A5 expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (F, G) qRT‐PCR analysis (F) and Western blot analysis (G) of SLC1A5 expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. (H) Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images and quantification of SLC1A5 in GC tissues and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues from the in‐house cohort. Scale bar: 50 µm. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to SLC1A5 expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (J, K) Colony formation (J) and EdU staining (K) assays in SLC1A5 knockdown AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm. (L, M) Intracellular glutamine concentration (L) and glutamine concentration of the cell culture supernatant (M) in AGS and MKN‐45 cells after SLC1A5 knockdown. n = 3. (N) Viability effect of glutamine in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN‐45 cells. Half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) values are indicated. n = 3. (O, P) Colony formation (O) and EdU staining (P) assays of SLC1A5‐overexpressing cells under normal (2 mM) or reduced (1 mM) glutamine conditions. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Mrna 3927, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/3927+mrna/pmc13011059-166-0-2
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna 3927 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna mrna 3745
High <t>SLC1A5</t> expression is associated with poor prognosis and promotes proliferation via glutamine accumulation in GC. (A) Venn diagram representing the overlap between DEGs (transcriptomic) and DEPs (proteomics). (B, C) Heatmaps displaying the expression patterns of the 30 hub genes at the transcriptomic (B) and proteomic (C) levels. (D, E) qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and Western blot analysis (E) of SLC1A5 expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (F, G) qRT‐PCR analysis (F) and Western blot analysis (G) of SLC1A5 expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. (H) Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images and quantification of SLC1A5 in GC tissues and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues from the in‐house cohort. Scale bar: 50 µm. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to SLC1A5 expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (J, K) Colony formation (J) and EdU staining (K) assays in SLC1A5 knockdown AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm. (L, M) Intracellular glutamine concentration (L) and glutamine concentration of the cell culture supernatant (M) in AGS and MKN‐45 cells after SLC1A5 knockdown. n = 3. (N) Viability effect of glutamine in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN‐45 cells. Half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) values are indicated. n = 3. (O, P) Colony formation (O) and EdU staining (P) assays of SLC1A5‐overexpressing cells under normal (2 mM) or reduced (1 mM) glutamine conditions. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Mrna 3745, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/3745+mrna/pmc13011059-165-0-2
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna 3745 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Moderna mrna 3705
High <t>SLC1A5</t> expression is associated with poor prognosis and promotes proliferation via glutamine accumulation in GC. (A) Venn diagram representing the overlap between DEGs (transcriptomic) and DEPs (proteomics). (B, C) Heatmaps displaying the expression patterns of the 30 hub genes at the transcriptomic (B) and proteomic (C) levels. (D, E) qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and Western blot analysis (E) of SLC1A5 expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (F, G) qRT‐PCR analysis (F) and Western blot analysis (G) of SLC1A5 expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. (H) Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images and quantification of SLC1A5 in GC tissues and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues from the in‐house cohort. Scale bar: 50 µm. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to SLC1A5 expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (J, K) Colony formation (J) and EdU staining (K) assays in SLC1A5 knockdown AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm. (L, M) Intracellular glutamine concentration (L) and glutamine concentration of the cell culture supernatant (M) in AGS and MKN‐45 cells after SLC1A5 knockdown. n = 3. (N) Viability effect of glutamine in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN‐45 cells. Half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) values are indicated. n = 3. (O, P) Colony formation (O) and EdU staining (P) assays of SLC1A5‐overexpressing cells under normal (2 mM) or reduced (1 mM) glutamine conditions. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Mrna 3705, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/3705+mrna/pmc13011059-164-0-2
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna 3705 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cellscript Inc t7 mscript standard mrna production system
XRN1 regulation of the HBV transcriptome (A) HBV transcript mapping. Cartoon depicting the genomic viral RNA with the 5′ and 3′ epsilon stem loops, canonical transcription start sites, and major viral RNAs along with open reading frames (core, Pol, L, M, S, and X). HepG2-NTCP WT or XRN1 KO22 cells were infected with HBV, RNAs extracted at 6 dpi, and analyzed by long-read sequencing. Read counts for pC, pg, preS1, preS2, S, and X transcripts (left), along with spliced isoforms (right), are shown. Data are presented for 6 independent samples and statistical significance assessed using unpaired t tests (corrected for multiple comparisons, ∗ p < 0.05). (B) In vitro pgRNA digestion by XRN1. Capped-analog modified <t>mRNA</t> was synthesized by in vitro transcription. The capped and decapped pgRNA was incubated with XRN1, evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and northern blotting using an HBV probe. Please see also .
T7 Mscript Standard Mrna Production System, supplied by Cellscript Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/amplicap+high+kit+maker+message+sp6+yield/pmc13276156-331-14-28
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
t7 mscript standard mrna production system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
MedChemExpress mrna decay experiment
XRN1 regulation of the HBV transcriptome (A) HBV transcript mapping. Cartoon depicting the genomic viral RNA with the 5′ and 3′ epsilon stem loops, canonical transcription start sites, and major viral RNAs along with open reading frames (core, Pol, L, M, S, and X). HepG2-NTCP WT or XRN1 KO22 cells were infected with HBV, RNAs extracted at 6 dpi, and analyzed by long-read sequencing. Read counts for pC, pg, preS1, preS2, S, and X transcripts (left), along with spliced isoforms (right), are shown. Data are presented for 6 independent samples and statistical significance assessed using unpaired t tests (corrected for multiple comparisons, ∗ p < 0.05). (B) In vitro pgRNA digestion by XRN1. Capped-analog modified <t>mRNA</t> was synthesized by in vitro transcription. The capped and decapped pgRNA was incubated with XRN1, evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and northern blotting using an HBV probe. Please see also .
Mrna Decay Experiment, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mrna/MPZL1%2C+Human/pm42464405-193-15-28
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mrna decay experiment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


High SLC1A5 expression is associated with poor prognosis and promotes proliferation via glutamine accumulation in GC. (A) Venn diagram representing the overlap between DEGs (transcriptomic) and DEPs (proteomics). (B, C) Heatmaps displaying the expression patterns of the 30 hub genes at the transcriptomic (B) and proteomic (C) levels. (D, E) qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and Western blot analysis (E) of SLC1A5 expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (F, G) qRT‐PCR analysis (F) and Western blot analysis (G) of SLC1A5 expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. (H) Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images and quantification of SLC1A5 in GC tissues and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues from the in‐house cohort. Scale bar: 50 µm. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to SLC1A5 expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (J, K) Colony formation (J) and EdU staining (K) assays in SLC1A5 knockdown AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm. (L, M) Intracellular glutamine concentration (L) and glutamine concentration of the cell culture supernatant (M) in AGS and MKN‐45 cells after SLC1A5 knockdown. n = 3. (N) Viability effect of glutamine in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN‐45 cells. Half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) values are indicated. n = 3. (O, P) Colony formation (O) and EdU staining (P) assays of SLC1A5‐overexpressing cells under normal (2 mM) or reduced (1 mM) glutamine conditions. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: METTL7A Downregulation Drives SLC1A5‐Mediated Glutamine Competition to Promote Tumor Proliferation and Suppress CD8 + T Cell Immunity in Gastric Cancer

doi: 10.1002/advs.76963

Figure Lengend Snippet: High SLC1A5 expression is associated with poor prognosis and promotes proliferation via glutamine accumulation in GC. (A) Venn diagram representing the overlap between DEGs (transcriptomic) and DEPs (proteomics). (B, C) Heatmaps displaying the expression patterns of the 30 hub genes at the transcriptomic (B) and proteomic (C) levels. (D, E) qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and Western blot analysis (E) of SLC1A5 expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (F, G) qRT‐PCR analysis (F) and Western blot analysis (G) of SLC1A5 expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. (H) Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images and quantification of SLC1A5 in GC tissues and paired adjacent noncancerous tissues from the in‐house cohort. Scale bar: 50 µm. (I) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to SLC1A5 expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (J, K) Colony formation (J) and EdU staining (K) assays in SLC1A5 knockdown AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm. (L, M) Intracellular glutamine concentration (L) and glutamine concentration of the cell culture supernatant (M) in AGS and MKN‐45 cells after SLC1A5 knockdown. n = 3. (N) Viability effect of glutamine in GES‐1, AGS, and MKN‐45 cells. Half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) values are indicated. n = 3. (O, P) Colony formation (O) and EdU staining (P) assays of SLC1A5‐overexpressing cells under normal (2 mM) or reduced (1 mM) glutamine conditions. n = 3. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Article Snippet: The stability of SLC1A5 mRNA was assessed by treating cells with actinomycin D (Act‐D; 10 μg/mL; MedChemExpress, HY‐17559) for the indicated durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), after which RNA was extracted and analyzed via qRT‐PCR.

Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Knockdown, Concentration Assay, Cell Culture

GC cells inhibit CD8 + T cell antitumor immunity through SLC1A5‐mediated glutamine competition. (A) t‐SNE plot showing cell clustering of GC single‐cell RNA‐seq data ( GSE163558 ; GSE184198 ). (B) t‐SNE plot showing SLC1A5 expression across all cell types. (C) Network plot of interaction weights/strength among different cell types. (D) Heatmap of interaction strength between epithelial cells and other cell types. (E) Representative immunofluorescence staining images of CD8 + T cells and GZMB + CD8 + T cells in human GC tissues with high or low SLC1A5 expression. Scale bars: 50 µm. (F–H) Flow cytometric analysis of human CD8 + T cells positive for GZMB (F), IFN‐γ (G), or TNF‐α (H) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (I, J) Viability of MKN‐45 cells assessed by Calcein‑AM/PI staining (I) and flow cytometry (J) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (K–M) Representative images (K), tumor growth curves (L), and tumor weights (M) of sh‐NC or SLC1A5 knockdown MFC tumors in BALB/c mice with or without intratumoral glutamine treatment. n = 5. (N, O) Flow cytometry analysis of tumor‐infiltrating CD8 + T cells (N) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (O) from sh‐NC or SLC1A5 knockdown MFC tumors in BALB/c mice with or without intratumoral glutamine treatment. n = 5. (P) Representative IHC images showing CD8 and GZMB staining from sh‐NC or SLC1A5 knockdown MFC tumors in BALB/c mice with or without intratumoral glutamine treatment. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: METTL7A Downregulation Drives SLC1A5‐Mediated Glutamine Competition to Promote Tumor Proliferation and Suppress CD8 + T Cell Immunity in Gastric Cancer

doi: 10.1002/advs.76963

Figure Lengend Snippet: GC cells inhibit CD8 + T cell antitumor immunity through SLC1A5‐mediated glutamine competition. (A) t‐SNE plot showing cell clustering of GC single‐cell RNA‐seq data ( GSE163558 ; GSE184198 ). (B) t‐SNE plot showing SLC1A5 expression across all cell types. (C) Network plot of interaction weights/strength among different cell types. (D) Heatmap of interaction strength between epithelial cells and other cell types. (E) Representative immunofluorescence staining images of CD8 + T cells and GZMB + CD8 + T cells in human GC tissues with high or low SLC1A5 expression. Scale bars: 50 µm. (F–H) Flow cytometric analysis of human CD8 + T cells positive for GZMB (F), IFN‐γ (G), or TNF‐α (H) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (I, J) Viability of MKN‐45 cells assessed by Calcein‑AM/PI staining (I) and flow cytometry (J) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (K–M) Representative images (K), tumor growth curves (L), and tumor weights (M) of sh‐NC or SLC1A5 knockdown MFC tumors in BALB/c mice with or without intratumoral glutamine treatment. n = 5. (N, O) Flow cytometry analysis of tumor‐infiltrating CD8 + T cells (N) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (O) from sh‐NC or SLC1A5 knockdown MFC tumors in BALB/c mice with or without intratumoral glutamine treatment. n = 5. (P) Representative IHC images showing CD8 and GZMB staining from sh‐NC or SLC1A5 knockdown MFC tumors in BALB/c mice with or without intratumoral glutamine treatment. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Article Snippet: The stability of SLC1A5 mRNA was assessed by treating cells with actinomycin D (Act‐D; 10 μg/mL; MedChemExpress, HY‐17559) for the indicated durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), after which RNA was extracted and analyzed via qRT‐PCR.

Techniques: Single Cell, RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Knockdown

METTL7A suppresses SLC1A5 expression via m6A modification to inhibit GC cell proliferation and restore CD8 + T cell antitumor immunity. (A) Predicted m6A modification sites on SLC1A5 mRNA from the SRAMP database. (B) Venn diagram identifying METTL7A as the sole overlapping gene between the m6A2Target database and multi‐omics analysis. (C, D) qRT‐PCR analysis (C) and Western blot analysis (D) of METTL7A expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (E, F) qRT‐PCR analysis (E) and Western blot analysis (F) of METTL7A expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. n = 3. (G) Representative IHC images and quantitative analysis of METTL7A protein expression. Scale bar: 50 µm. (H) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to METTL7A expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (I, J) Colony formation (I) and EdU staining (J) assays were conducted in AGS and MKN‐45 cells as indicated. Scale bars: 100 µm. n = 3. (K–M) Flow cytometric analysis of human CD8 + T cells positive for GZMB (K), IFN‐γ (L), or TNF‐α (M) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (N, O) Viability of MKN‐45 cells assessed by Calcein‑AM/PI staining (N) and flow cytometry (O) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (P) Dot blot assay was conducted in METTL7A overexpression AGS and MKN‐45 cells. (Q) RNA stability assay was conducted in METTL7A overexpression AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. (R) MeRIP‐qPCR analysis of m6A enrichment across 3′ UTR of SLC1A5 mRNA in oe‐NC and METTL7A‐overexpressing cells. n = 3. (S) Schematic of the luciferase reporter constructs containing the wild‐type (WT) or mutant (Mut1–4) SLC1A5 3′ UTR. (T) Luciferase activity of reporters containing the WT or mutant (Mut1–4) SLC1A5 3′ UTR in oe‐NC versus METTL7A‐overexpressing cells. n = 3.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: METTL7A Downregulation Drives SLC1A5‐Mediated Glutamine Competition to Promote Tumor Proliferation and Suppress CD8 + T Cell Immunity in Gastric Cancer

doi: 10.1002/advs.76963

Figure Lengend Snippet: METTL7A suppresses SLC1A5 expression via m6A modification to inhibit GC cell proliferation and restore CD8 + T cell antitumor immunity. (A) Predicted m6A modification sites on SLC1A5 mRNA from the SRAMP database. (B) Venn diagram identifying METTL7A as the sole overlapping gene between the m6A2Target database and multi‐omics analysis. (C, D) qRT‐PCR analysis (C) and Western blot analysis (D) of METTL7A expression in paired GC and adjacent noncancerous tissues. (E, F) qRT‐PCR analysis (E) and Western blot analysis (F) of METTL7A expression in GES‐1 and GC cells. n = 3. (G) Representative IHC images and quantitative analysis of METTL7A protein expression. Scale bar: 50 µm. (H) Kaplan–Meier survival curves according to METTL7A expression in the in‐house GC cohort. (I, J) Colony formation (I) and EdU staining (J) assays were conducted in AGS and MKN‐45 cells as indicated. Scale bars: 100 µm. n = 3. (K–M) Flow cytometric analysis of human CD8 + T cells positive for GZMB (K), IFN‐γ (L), or TNF‐α (M) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (N, O) Viability of MKN‐45 cells assessed by Calcein‑AM/PI staining (N) and flow cytometry (O) across different treatment groups. n = 3. (P) Dot blot assay was conducted in METTL7A overexpression AGS and MKN‐45 cells. (Q) RNA stability assay was conducted in METTL7A overexpression AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. (R) MeRIP‐qPCR analysis of m6A enrichment across 3′ UTR of SLC1A5 mRNA in oe‐NC and METTL7A‐overexpressing cells. n = 3. (S) Schematic of the luciferase reporter constructs containing the wild‐type (WT) or mutant (Mut1–4) SLC1A5 3′ UTR. (T) Luciferase activity of reporters containing the WT or mutant (Mut1–4) SLC1A5 3′ UTR in oe‐NC versus METTL7A‐overexpressing cells. n = 3.

Article Snippet: The stability of SLC1A5 mRNA was assessed by treating cells with actinomycin D (Act‐D; 10 μg/mL; MedChemExpress, HY‐17559) for the indicated durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), after which RNA was extracted and analyzed via qRT‐PCR.

Techniques: Expressing, Modification, Biomarker Discovery, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Dot Blot, Over Expression, Stability Assay, Luciferase, Construct, Mutagenesis, Activity Assay

METTL7A inhibits N‐glycosylation of SLC1A5 via downregulation of B4GALT5. (A) GSEA of the GSE84437 dataset based on SLC1A5 expression. (B) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 glycosylation status in AGS and MKN‐45 cells treated with PNGase F, TM, or OSMI‐1. (C) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation from four human GC tissues treated with or without PNGase F. (D) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation in AGS and MKN‐45 cells with or without METTL7A overexpression, alongside TM treatment. (E) Venn diagram identifying the overlap between SLC1A5‐interacting proteins (by IP‐MS) and glycosyltransferases from the GlycoGene (GGDB) database. (F) qRT‐PCR was used to compare the expression of 17 candidate N‐glycosyltransferases in GC cells with and without METTL7A overexpression. n = 3. (G) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation in AGS and MKN‐45 cells following knockdown of the six indicated N‐glycosyltransferases. (H) Western blot analysis of B4GALT5 protein levels in GC cells with or without METTL7A overexpression. (I) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation under the indicated conditions. (J, K) Co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP) assay probing the interaction between endogenous B4GALT5 and SLC1A5 in AGS cells. (L) Immunofluorescence staining showing the subcellular localization and co‐localization of B4GALT5 and SLC1A5 in AGS and MKN‐45 cells. Scale bars: 5 µm. (M) Schematic diagram of full‐length (FL) and truncated mutants of the B4GALT5 protein. (N) Co‐IP assays assessing the interaction between SLC1A5 and the series of B4GALT5 mutants.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: METTL7A Downregulation Drives SLC1A5‐Mediated Glutamine Competition to Promote Tumor Proliferation and Suppress CD8 + T Cell Immunity in Gastric Cancer

doi: 10.1002/advs.76963

Figure Lengend Snippet: METTL7A inhibits N‐glycosylation of SLC1A5 via downregulation of B4GALT5. (A) GSEA of the GSE84437 dataset based on SLC1A5 expression. (B) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 glycosylation status in AGS and MKN‐45 cells treated with PNGase F, TM, or OSMI‐1. (C) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation from four human GC tissues treated with or without PNGase F. (D) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation in AGS and MKN‐45 cells with or without METTL7A overexpression, alongside TM treatment. (E) Venn diagram identifying the overlap between SLC1A5‐interacting proteins (by IP‐MS) and glycosyltransferases from the GlycoGene (GGDB) database. (F) qRT‐PCR was used to compare the expression of 17 candidate N‐glycosyltransferases in GC cells with and without METTL7A overexpression. n = 3. (G) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation in AGS and MKN‐45 cells following knockdown of the six indicated N‐glycosyltransferases. (H) Western blot analysis of B4GALT5 protein levels in GC cells with or without METTL7A overexpression. (I) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation under the indicated conditions. (J, K) Co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP) assay probing the interaction between endogenous B4GALT5 and SLC1A5 in AGS cells. (L) Immunofluorescence staining showing the subcellular localization and co‐localization of B4GALT5 and SLC1A5 in AGS and MKN‐45 cells. Scale bars: 5 µm. (M) Schematic diagram of full‐length (FL) and truncated mutants of the B4GALT5 protein. (N) Co‐IP assays assessing the interaction between SLC1A5 and the series of B4GALT5 mutants.

Article Snippet: The stability of SLC1A5 mRNA was assessed by treating cells with actinomycin D (Act‐D; 10 μg/mL; MedChemExpress, HY‐17559) for the indicated durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), after which RNA was extracted and analyzed via qRT‐PCR.

Techniques: Glycoproteomics, Expressing, Western Blot, Over Expression, Protein-Protein interactions, Quantitative RT-PCR, Knockdown, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining

B4GALT5 prevents K48‐linked polyubiquitination of SLC1A5 by promoting its N‐glycosylation. (A) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 expression in AGS and MKN‐45 cells treated with TM at different doses or for different amounts of time. (B) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 expression in GC cells treated with TM in combination with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 or the lysosome inhibitor chloroquine (CQ). (C) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay assessed by Western blot to determine SLC1A5 protein half‐life in GC cells with or without B4GALT5 knockdown. (D) Evaluation of endogenous SLC1A5 ubiquitination in AGS cells under the indicated conditions. (E) Immunofluorescence staining of SLC1A5 protein levels and localization in AGS and MKN‐45 cells under the indicated conditions. Scale bars: 5 µm. (F) A set of Myc‐tagged ubiquitin mutants (WT, K6, K11, K27, K29, K33, K48, or K63) was co‐expressed with HA‐SLC1A5 and Flag‐B4GALT5 in HEK293T cells, followed by anti‐HA immunoblot to determine the chain linkage pattern on SLC1A5. (G) IP‐MS analysis identified N‐glycosylation at the N212 site of SLC1A5. (H) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation in HEK293T cells co‐transfected with WT or N212Q mutant SLC1A5 and either full‐length (FL) or truncated (ΔB) B4GALT5. (I) CHX chase assay assessed by Western blot comparing the degradation rate of WT and N212Q mutant SLC1A5 protein with or without B4GALT5 overexpression. (J) HEK293T cells were co‐transfected with HA‐SLC1A5 (WT or N212Q), Flag‐B4GALT5 (FL or ΔB mutant), and Myc‐K48 ubiquitin. Immunoprecipitation of HA‐tagged SLC1A5 to analyze its K48‐linked polyubiquitination.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: METTL7A Downregulation Drives SLC1A5‐Mediated Glutamine Competition to Promote Tumor Proliferation and Suppress CD8 + T Cell Immunity in Gastric Cancer

doi: 10.1002/advs.76963

Figure Lengend Snippet: B4GALT5 prevents K48‐linked polyubiquitination of SLC1A5 by promoting its N‐glycosylation. (A) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 expression in AGS and MKN‐45 cells treated with TM at different doses or for different amounts of time. (B) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 expression in GC cells treated with TM in combination with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 or the lysosome inhibitor chloroquine (CQ). (C) Cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay assessed by Western blot to determine SLC1A5 protein half‐life in GC cells with or without B4GALT5 knockdown. (D) Evaluation of endogenous SLC1A5 ubiquitination in AGS cells under the indicated conditions. (E) Immunofluorescence staining of SLC1A5 protein levels and localization in AGS and MKN‐45 cells under the indicated conditions. Scale bars: 5 µm. (F) A set of Myc‐tagged ubiquitin mutants (WT, K6, K11, K27, K29, K33, K48, or K63) was co‐expressed with HA‐SLC1A5 and Flag‐B4GALT5 in HEK293T cells, followed by anti‐HA immunoblot to determine the chain linkage pattern on SLC1A5. (G) IP‐MS analysis identified N‐glycosylation at the N212 site of SLC1A5. (H) Western blot analysis of SLC1A5 N‐glycosylation in HEK293T cells co‐transfected with WT or N212Q mutant SLC1A5 and either full‐length (FL) or truncated (ΔB) B4GALT5. (I) CHX chase assay assessed by Western blot comparing the degradation rate of WT and N212Q mutant SLC1A5 protein with or without B4GALT5 overexpression. (J) HEK293T cells were co‐transfected with HA‐SLC1A5 (WT or N212Q), Flag‐B4GALT5 (FL or ΔB mutant), and Myc‐K48 ubiquitin. Immunoprecipitation of HA‐tagged SLC1A5 to analyze its K48‐linked polyubiquitination.

Article Snippet: The stability of SLC1A5 mRNA was assessed by treating cells with actinomycin D (Act‐D; 10 μg/mL; MedChemExpress, HY‐17559) for the indicated durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), after which RNA was extracted and analyzed via qRT‐PCR.

Techniques: Glycoproteomics, Western Blot, Expressing, Knockdown, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Protein-Protein interactions, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Over Expression, Immunoprecipitation

Luteolin inhibits GC progression by upregulating METTL7A and enhances the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1 therapy. (A) Chemical structure of the natural flavonoid Luteolin (Lut). (B) Molecular docking model predicting the binding pose of Lut within the METTL7A protein structure. (C) Cellular Thermal Shift Assay (CETSA) measuring the thermal stability of METTL7A protein in GC cells treated with DMSO or Lut. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of METTL7A, B4GALT5, and SLC1A5 protein levels in AGS and MKN‐45 cells under the indicated conditions. Scale bars: 5 µm. (E) The half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values of Lut in AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. (F, G) Colony formation (F) and EdU staining (G) assays in AGS and MKN‐45 cells under the indicated conditions. Scale bars: 100 µm. n = 3. (H–J) Representative images (H), tumor growth curves (I), and tumor weights (J) in MFC xenograft‐bearing mice across different treatment groups. n = 5. (K) Schematic of the combination therapy experiment timeline using MFC tumor‐bearing mice treated with Lut alone, anti‐PD‐1 antibody alone, or their combination. (L–N) Representative images (L), tumor growth curves (M), and tumor weights (N) in MFC xenograft‐bearing mice across different treatment groups. n = 5. (O, P) Flow cytometry analysis of tumor‐infiltrating CD8 + T cells (O) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (P) across different treatment groups. n = 5. (Q) Representative IHC images showing CD8 and GZMB staining across different treatment groups. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: METTL7A Downregulation Drives SLC1A5‐Mediated Glutamine Competition to Promote Tumor Proliferation and Suppress CD8 + T Cell Immunity in Gastric Cancer

doi: 10.1002/advs.76963

Figure Lengend Snippet: Luteolin inhibits GC progression by upregulating METTL7A and enhances the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1 therapy. (A) Chemical structure of the natural flavonoid Luteolin (Lut). (B) Molecular docking model predicting the binding pose of Lut within the METTL7A protein structure. (C) Cellular Thermal Shift Assay (CETSA) measuring the thermal stability of METTL7A protein in GC cells treated with DMSO or Lut. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of METTL7A, B4GALT5, and SLC1A5 protein levels in AGS and MKN‐45 cells under the indicated conditions. Scale bars: 5 µm. (E) The half‐maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values of Lut in AGS and MKN‐45 cells. n = 3. (F, G) Colony formation (F) and EdU staining (G) assays in AGS and MKN‐45 cells under the indicated conditions. Scale bars: 100 µm. n = 3. (H–J) Representative images (H), tumor growth curves (I), and tumor weights (J) in MFC xenograft‐bearing mice across different treatment groups. n = 5. (K) Schematic of the combination therapy experiment timeline using MFC tumor‐bearing mice treated with Lut alone, anti‐PD‐1 antibody alone, or their combination. (L–N) Representative images (L), tumor growth curves (M), and tumor weights (N) in MFC xenograft‐bearing mice across different treatment groups. n = 5. (O, P) Flow cytometry analysis of tumor‐infiltrating CD8 + T cells (O) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (P) across different treatment groups. n = 5. (Q) Representative IHC images showing CD8 and GZMB staining across different treatment groups. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Article Snippet: The stability of SLC1A5 mRNA was assessed by treating cells with actinomycin D (Act‐D; 10 μg/mL; MedChemExpress, HY‐17559) for the indicated durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), after which RNA was extracted and analyzed via qRT‐PCR.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Thermal Shift Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Concentration Assay, Flow Cytometry

XRN1 regulation of the HBV transcriptome (A) HBV transcript mapping. Cartoon depicting the genomic viral RNA with the 5′ and 3′ epsilon stem loops, canonical transcription start sites, and major viral RNAs along with open reading frames (core, Pol, L, M, S, and X). HepG2-NTCP WT or XRN1 KO22 cells were infected with HBV, RNAs extracted at 6 dpi, and analyzed by long-read sequencing. Read counts for pC, pg, preS1, preS2, S, and X transcripts (left), along with spliced isoforms (right), are shown. Data are presented for 6 independent samples and statistical significance assessed using unpaired t tests (corrected for multiple comparisons, ∗ p < 0.05). (B) In vitro pgRNA digestion by XRN1. Capped-analog modified mRNA was synthesized by in vitro transcription. The capped and decapped pgRNA was incubated with XRN1, evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and northern blotting using an HBV probe. Please see also .

Journal: iScience

Article Title: A key role for the exoribonuclease XRN1 in regulating the hepatitis B viral transcriptome

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.116328

Figure Lengend Snippet: XRN1 regulation of the HBV transcriptome (A) HBV transcript mapping. Cartoon depicting the genomic viral RNA with the 5′ and 3′ epsilon stem loops, canonical transcription start sites, and major viral RNAs along with open reading frames (core, Pol, L, M, S, and X). HepG2-NTCP WT or XRN1 KO22 cells were infected with HBV, RNAs extracted at 6 dpi, and analyzed by long-read sequencing. Read counts for pC, pg, preS1, preS2, S, and X transcripts (left), along with spliced isoforms (right), are shown. Data are presented for 6 independent samples and statistical significance assessed using unpaired t tests (corrected for multiple comparisons, ∗ p < 0.05). (B) In vitro pgRNA digestion by XRN1. Capped-analog modified mRNA was synthesized by in vitro transcription. The capped and decapped pgRNA was incubated with XRN1, evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and northern blotting using an HBV probe. Please see also .

Article Snippet: In vitro pgRNA transcription was performed in a 20 μL final volume using a T7 mScript standard mRNA production system by following the protocol provided by the manufacturer (CellScript), the DNA template was digested with 10 μL of a DNase cocktail containing 10 U of DNase I (NEB), 3 μL 10 X DNase I buffer, 2 μL nuclease-free water and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. After purification of the RNA using RNeasy kit (Qiagen), capping and polyadenylation were performed following Cap1 and Cap0 mRNA protocol described in the user’s manual, and the RNA was again purified using RNeasy kit.

Techniques: Infection, Sequencing, In Vitro, Modification, Synthesized, Incubation, Agarose Gel Electrophoresis, Northern Blot