Review





Similar Products

product data sheets  (ATCC)
97
ATCC product data sheets
Product Data Sheets, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/product data sheets/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
product data sheets - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg data  (Elekta)
86
Elekta meg data
Meg Data, supplied by Elekta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/meg data/product/Elekta
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg data analysis  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc meg data analysis
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Meg Data Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/meg data analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg phantom data analysis  (Takeda)
90
Takeda meg phantom data analysis
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Meg Phantom Data Analysis, supplied by Takeda, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/meg phantom data analysis/product/Takeda
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg phantom data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
raw opm-meg data  (Elekta)
90
Elekta raw opm-meg data
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Raw Opm Meg Data, supplied by Elekta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/raw opm-meg data/product/Elekta
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
raw opm-meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
eeg meg data acquisition  (Compumedics Neuroscan)
86
Compumedics Neuroscan eeg meg data acquisition
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Eeg Meg Data Acquisition, supplied by Compumedics Neuroscan, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/eeg meg data acquisition/product/Compumedics Neuroscan
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
eeg meg data acquisition - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
meg data  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc meg data
Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and <t>MEG</t> <t>data</t> were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.
Meg Data, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/meg data/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
meg data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Parallel and dynamic attention allocation during natural reading

doi: 10.1101/2025.05.27.656336

Figure Lengend Snippet: Each trial began with a fixation-cross at the screen centre, followed by a “starting box” on the left. Fixating on the starting box would trigger the sentence onset. Participants ( n = 42) were instructed to read 188 sentences silently and then gaze at the “ending box” at the screen bottom to trigger the sentence offset. Randomly, 25% of trails included a simple comprehension question requiring a button response. Each sentence contained one or two target words, either of low or high lexical frequency. The target words were unpredictable from the prior context and all sentences were plausible. RIFT was applied by continuously flickering rectangle patches underneath the target and post-target words at frequencies f t and f p respectively (60 and 65 Hz sine waves, balanced across participants). A Gaussian mask was applied over the patch to smooth the sharp luminance changes around the edges to reduce their visibility across saccades. Two discs were positioned at the bottom corners of the screen, with their luminance oscillating at sine waves of f t and f p separately throughout the entire trial. These discs were covered by two photodiodes, and, during sentence presentation, their luminance changes mirrored those of the patches beneath the flickering words. Eye tracker and MEG data were acquired simultaneously. ITI, inter-trial interval.

Article Snippet: The MEG data analysis was conducted using MATLAB R2020a (Mathworks Inc, USA), incorporating the FieldTrip toolbox (version 20200220; Oostenveld et al., 2011), the FLUX MEG analysis pipeline , and custom-made scripts.

Techniques: