Review

fmincon in matlab 2021b (MathWorks Inc)

MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

MathWorks Inc fmincon in matlab 2021b
Fmincon In Matlab 2021b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+2021b/pmc12279372-352-13-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews

fmincon in matlab 2021b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09

90/100 stars

Images

other:

Article Title: Altered cortical dynamics and adaptive behavior following early-onset sucrose overconsumption.
Article Snippet: REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Deposited data Data reported in paper This paper https://doi.org/10.17605/ OSF.IO/Y6QFM Experimental models: Organisms/strains Mouse: C57BL/6J The Jackson Laboratory RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664 Mouse: C57BL/6J-Tg (Thy1GCaMP6f) GP5.17Dkim/J The Jackson Laboratory RRID: IMSR_JAX:025393 Software and algorithms ImageJ NIH Image https://imagej.net/ij/ MATLAB 2021b Mathworks https://www.mathworks. com/products/ matlab.html NI DAQmx 19.0 National Instruments https://www.ni.com/en/ support/downloads.html GroupICATv4.0b Calhoun et al.65 https://trendscenter.org/ software/gift/ Custom MATLAB code for analysis This paper https://osf.io/e73mt/ Other Objective and tube lens Samyang MF 85mm F1.4 Emission filter Edmund #86-963 Dichroic mirror Custom design LP500 sCMOS Camera Teledyne Technologies Prime BSI Express 405 nm & 470 nm LED light source Custom design Optical Imaging Facility, CIBR 405 nm & 470 nm excitation filter Ruicheng Guangdian www.ruiccn.com Dichroic mirror for 405 nm & 470 nm Ruicheng Guangdian www.ruiccn.com Optomechanics LBTEK https://www.lbtek.com/ ll OPEN ACCESS Current Biology 35, 1–14.e1–e6, August 4, 2025 e1 Article

Article Title: A neurofunctional signature of affective arousal generalizes across valence domains and distinguishes subjective experience from autonomic reactivity.
Article Snippet: All the above toolboxes/ tools were implemented in MATLAB 2021b.

Article Title: A neurofunctional signature of affective arousal generalizes across valence domains and distinguishes subjective experience from autonomic reactivity
Article Snippet: All the above toolboxes/tools were implemented in MATLAB 2021b.

Article Title: Supporting Information for Different mechanisms of contextual inference govern associatively learned and sensory-evoked postural responses
Article Snippet: Data processing and analysis All data analysis was performed using MATLAB (2021b, MathWorks, MA, USA).

Article Title: Processor-in-the-Loop validation of direct power control based on fractional-order modified super-twisting algorithm for doubly-fed induction generators.
Article Snippet: The compatibility of the PIL simulation results with the Matlab 2021b simulation results shows the superiority of DPC-FOMSTA over DPC technique in terms of minimizing DFIG power fluctuations and improving system characteristics.

Generated:

Article Title: Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer
Article Snippet: .. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b. ..

Image Search Results

Enhanced coherence of CR condition at the alpha frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and SMA (FCz) at the alpha frequency band was observed in the CR condition during both training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels, or areas in either motor skill acquisition or transfer. ( c) Detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and FCz over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the alpha frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, the 10th block exhibited enhanced coherence that significantly differed from the first block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) Enhanced coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and FCz at the alpha frequency band in the non-trained hand was observed after training compared to the baseline in the CR condition. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11943-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced coherence of CR condition at the alpha frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and SMA (FCz) at the alpha frequency band was observed in the CR condition during both training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels, or areas in either motor skill acquisition or transfer. ( c) Detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and FCz over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the alpha frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, the 10th block exhibited enhanced coherence that significantly differed from the first block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) Enhanced coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and FCz at the alpha frequency band in the non-trained hand was observed after training compared to the baseline in the CR condition. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Article Snippet: The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Standard Deviation, Generated

Enhanced coherence in the CL condition at the theta frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and centroparietal regions (CPz) at the theta frequency band was observed in both training (pre-test vs. post-test), training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages only in the CL condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels or regions in either transfer or practice. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and CPz over 10 blocks of training in the CL condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each training block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 5, 6 and 10 exhibited enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and CPz at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced right hand in the CL condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11943-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced coherence in the CL condition at the theta frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and centroparietal regions (CPz) at the theta frequency band was observed in both training (pre-test vs. post-test), training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages only in the CL condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels or regions in either transfer or practice. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and CPz over 10 blocks of training in the CL condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each training block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 5, 6 and 10 exhibited enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and CPz at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced right hand in the CL condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Article Snippet: The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Standard Deviation, Generated

Enhanced coherence in the CR condition at the theta frequency band. The left frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and right frontal regions (F2, F4, F6, F8) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and centroparietal regions (CP1, CP3, CP5) at the theta frequency band was observed during both the training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages exclusively in the CR condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed in the right frontal area (F2, F4, F6, F8) or other channels or areas. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 3, 4 and 10 showed enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced left hand in the CR condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11943-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced coherence in the CR condition at the theta frequency band. The left frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and right frontal regions (F2, F4, F6, F8) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and centroparietal regions (CP1, CP3, CP5) at the theta frequency band was observed during both the training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages exclusively in the CR condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed in the right frontal area (F2, F4, F6, F8) or other channels or areas. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 3, 4 and 10 showed enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced left hand in the CR condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Article Snippet: The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

Techniques: Blocking Assay, Standard Deviation, Generated

Review

fmincon in matlab 2021b (MathWorks Inc)

Structured Review

Images

Related Articles

other:

Generated:

Similar Products

Image Search Results