Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative visualization of 3D imaging techniques: SMs generated using three methods: (1) Vectra M5, featuring five camera pods mounted on a rigid frame for stereophotogrammetry, (2) iPhone 14 Pro “3D Scanner App” V2.1.2 in “Photo-Mode”, which required capturing images in a circular motion, and (3) iPhone 14 Pro “3D Scanner App” V2.1.2 in “TrueDepth-Mode” utilizing the device’s front-facing TrueDepth camera in a circular motion. MS PowerPoint was used to create the illustration

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Imaging, Generated

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Facial areas of interest (FAOI): Appearance of a 20-year-old female participant; the iPhone 14 Pro using the application “3D Scanner App” V2.1.2 was utilized to create the SMs on the left and right side; SM generated using the “Photo-Mode” (left), Vectra M5 (middle); SM generated using the TrueDepth-Mode (right). SMs with applied texture above and without texture below

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Generated

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Presentation of the superimposed SMs: A SM generated by an iPhone 14 Pro using the “3D Scanner App’s” V2.1.2 “Photo-Mode” was superimposed onto a SM generated by the Vectra M5 (left). A SM generated by an iPhone 14 Pro using the “3D Scanner App’s” “TrueDepth-Mode” was superimposed onto a SM generated by the Vectra M5 (right)

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Generated

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Flowchart summarizing the study’s methodology: 3D data acquisition, 3D data processing, and measurements. The study involved SM generation using three methods: (1) the iPhone 14 Pro’s “3D-Scanner App” V2.1.2 in “Photo-Mode” (2) stereophotogrammetry with the Vectra M5, and (3) the iPhone 14 Pro’s “3D-Scanner App” V2.1.2 in “TrueDepth-Mode”. Data processing steps included extraction of facial areas of interest (FAOIs), scaling and rough alignment via CloudCompare’s ICP-Algorithm, and superimposition and precise alignment via Vectra Analysis Module (VAM) for SM comparison. Measurements included landmark-to-landmark distances and volumetric analyses for the upper face, mid-, and lower face regions utilizing the VAM

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Extraction, Comparison

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Volumetric measurements: A SM generated by an iPhone 14 Pro using the “3D Scanner App’s” V2.1.2 “TrueDepth-Mode” was superimposed onto a SM generated by the Vectra M5; Volumetric assessments of the upper face, mid-face and lower face (left to right) were performed. Values in cubic centimeters (cc)

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Generated

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Measurements performed between superimposed SMs: All measurements were performed between TrueDepth- and photogrammetry-based SMs superimposed onto Vectra-based SMs; (1) – (16) landmark-to-landmark distances; (17) – (20) volumetric distances

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques:

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Descriptive Statistics: Landmark-to-landmark distance analyses; comparison of Vectra M5- and smartphone-based SMs; values in millimeters (mm) for TrueDepth-based and photogrammetry-based measurements (1) – (16); IBM SPSS 29 was used for data analysis

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Comparison

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Landmark–to–landmark distances: 95% Bland–Altman LoA for measurement (1) – (16); and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples for measurements (1) – (16); values in millimeters (mm); IBM SPSS 29 was used for data analysis

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques:

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman Plots: Comparison of TrueDepth- and Photogrammetry-based SMs . Measurements (1) – (20); Values in millimeters (mm) for measurement (1) – (16) and cubic centimeters (cc) for measurements (17) – (20). MS Excel was used to create the illustration

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Comparison

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Descriptive Statistics: Volumetric difference between superimposed SMs; comparison of Vectra M5- and smartphone-based SMs; values in cubic centimeters (cc) for TrueDepth-based and photogrammetry-based measurements (17) – (20); IBM SPSS 29 was used for data analysis

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: Comparison

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Volumetric measurements: 95% Bland–Altman LoA for measurements (17) – (20); and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples for measurements (17) – (20); values in cubic centimeters (cc); IBM SPSS 29 was used for data analysis

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques:

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Inter-observer reliability of TrueDepth-based measurements: Bland–Altman analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Median values and mean bias in millimeters (mm) for measurements (1) – (16) and in cubic centimeters (cc) for measurements (17) – (20). OP 1 = Observer 1, OP 2 = Observer 2; IBM SPSS 29 was used for data analysis

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques:

Journal: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Article Title: Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5

doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman Plots: Inter-observer reliability of TrueDepth-based measurements . Measurements (1) – (20); Values in millimeters (mm) for measurement (1) – (16) and cubic centimeters (cc) for measurements (17) – (20). MS Excel was used to create the illustration

Article Snippet: Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 ( Canfield Scientific, USA ), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro ( Apple Inc., USA ), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry.

Techniques: