|
Oxford Instruments
imagej fiji 2 0 Imagej Fiji 2 0, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/imagej/pm42185297-350-9-11?v=Oxford+Instruments Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imagej fiji 2 0 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Servicebio Inc
imagej software Imagej Software, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/imagej/pm42192364-92-20-6?v=Servicebio+Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imagej software - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Institut Curie
imagej fiji plugin manual tracking Imagej Fiji Plugin Manual Tracking, supplied by Institut Curie, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/imagej/pm42163310-134-21-29?v=Institut+Curie Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imagej fiji plugin manual tracking - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Oxford Instruments
imagej Imagej, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/imagej/pm42144055-130-0-2?v=Oxford+Instruments Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imagej - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Oxford Instruments
fiji imagej Fiji Imagej, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/imagej/pm42129837-129-29-31?v=Oxford+Instruments Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fiji imagej - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Motic Group
imagej 1.54p Imagej 1.54p, supplied by Motic Group, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/imagej/pm42075891-237-18-8?v=Motic+Group Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imagej 1.54p - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Radimetrics Inc
imagej macro ![]() Imagej Macro, supplied by Radimetrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/imagej/pmc13136667-98-23-26?v=Radimetrics+Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imagej macro - by Bioz Stars,
2026-06
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Article Title: Automated calculation of slice-specific volume computed tomography dose index, water-equivalent diameter, and size-specific dose estimation for computed tomography scans
doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.253555
Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) The study population, and (b) the workflow for automated slice-specific calculation of the volume computed tomography dose index, water-equivalent diameter, and size-specific dose estimate using the ImageJ macro. CTDI vol , volume computed tomography dose index; D w , water-equivalent diameter; SSDE, size-specific dose estimate.
Article Snippet: For the SSDE, the mean difference was –0.123 mGy (–1.911 to 1.665 mGy), with an ICC of 0.967, confirming near-perfect agreement between the
Techniques: Computed Tomography
Journal: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Article Title: Automated calculation of slice-specific volume computed tomography dose index, water-equivalent diameter, and size-specific dose estimation for computed tomography scans
doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.253555
Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plots comparing the dose parameters obtained from the ImageJ macro and the scanner console display (Scanner A) for (a) volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI vol ), (b) water-equivalent diameter (D w ), and (c) size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in head computed tomography (CT) examinations and (d) CTDI vol , (e) D w , and (f) SSDE in chest/abdomen CT examinations. LOA, limits of agreement; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.
Article Snippet: For the SSDE, the mean difference was –0.123 mGy (–1.911 to 1.665 mGy), with an ICC of 0.967, confirming near-perfect agreement between the
Techniques: Computed Tomography
Journal: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Article Title: Automated calculation of slice-specific volume computed tomography dose index, water-equivalent diameter, and size-specific dose estimation for computed tomography scans
doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.253555
Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plots comparing the dose parameters obtained from the ImageJ macro and Radimetrics (Scanner B) for (a) volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI vol ), (b) water-equivalent diameter (D w ), and (c) size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in head computed tomography (CT) examinations and (d) CTDI vol , (e) D w , and (f) SSDE in chest/abdomen CT examinations. LOA, limits of agreement; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.
Article Snippet: For the SSDE, the mean difference was –0.123 mGy (–1.911 to 1.665 mGy), with an ICC of 0.967, confirming near-perfect agreement between the
Techniques: Computed Tomography
Journal: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Article Title: Automated calculation of slice-specific volume computed tomography dose index, water-equivalent diameter, and size-specific dose estimation for computed tomography scans
doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.253555
Figure Lengend Snippet: Box plot comparison of (a) the water-equivalent diameter and (b) size-specific dose estimate obtained from the ImageJ macro, computed tomography scanner console, and Radimetrics across anatomical regions and scanners. Boxes represent the interquartile range, center lines indicate the median, whiskers extend to the data range, and crosses (×) represent the mean values. CT, computed tomography; D w , water-equivalent diameter; SSDE, size-specific dose estimate.
Article Snippet: For the SSDE, the mean difference was –0.123 mGy (–1.911 to 1.665 mGy), with an ICC of 0.967, confirming near-perfect agreement between the
Techniques: Comparison, Computed Tomography