Review





Similar Products

gram negative bacteria gnb  (ATCC)
99
ATCC gram negative bacteria gnb
Gram Negative Bacteria Gnb, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/pmc12389187-95-1-49?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gram negative bacteria gnb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cr gnb  (Chennai Corporation)
86
Chennai Corporation cr gnb
Cr Gnb, supplied by Chennai Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/pm41699489-38-9-5?v=Chennai+Corporation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cr gnb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gnb  (Kaggle Inc)
86
Kaggle Inc gnb
Gnb, supplied by Kaggle Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/10__1016_slash_j__rineng__2025__107480-122-0-10?v=Kaggle+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gnb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gnb code-group 0 + 1  (Tokyo Chemical Industry)
90
Tokyo Chemical Industry gnb code-group 0 + 1
Gnb Code Group 0 + 1, supplied by Tokyo Chemical Industry, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/us12368562-780-20-15?v=Tokyo+Chemical+Industry
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gnb code-group 0 + 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
nr gnb  (NextGen Sciences)
90
NextGen Sciences nr gnb
Nr Gnb, supplied by NextGen Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/us12342407-278-3-7?v=NextGen+Sciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nr gnb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
p -nitrophenyl-β-gnb  (Tokyo Chemical Industry)
90
Tokyo Chemical Industry p -nitrophenyl-β-gnb
P Nitrophenyl β Gnb, supplied by Tokyo Chemical Industry, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/pmc12149517-58-17-22?v=Tokyo+Chemical+Industry
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p -nitrophenyl-β-gnb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gnb  (Biosynth Carbosynth)
90
Biosynth Carbosynth gnb
Gnb, supplied by Biosynth Carbosynth, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/pmc12149517-49-0-4?v=Biosynth+Carbosynth
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gnb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gnb and cs-pcos  (IEEE Access)
90
IEEE Access gnb and cs-pcos
Gnb And Cs Pcos, supplied by IEEE Access, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/pmc12032871-209-9-4?v=IEEE+Access
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gnb and cs-pcos - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gnb  (StatLog Inc)
90
StatLog Inc gnb
Results of classifiers (in %) without feature selection.
Gnb, supplied by StatLog Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/gnb/pmc11839996-865-30-35?v=StatLog+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gnb - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Results of classifiers (in %) without feature selection.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) without feature selection.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques: Selection

Results of classifiers (in %) with Information Gain.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with Information Gain.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with Chi-Square Test.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with Chi-Square Test.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with FDA.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with FDA.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with Variance Threshold.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with Variance Threshold.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with MAD.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with MAD.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with Dispersion Ratio.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with Dispersion Ratio.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques: Dispersion

Results of classifiers (in %) with Relief.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with Relief.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with Lasso.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with Lasso.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with RF Importance.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with RF Importance.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with LDA.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with LDA.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Results of classifiers (in %) with PCA.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of classifiers (in %) with PCA.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques:

Performance of proposed model and state-of-the-art models.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: An extensive experimental analysis for heart disease prediction using artificial intelligence techniques

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90530-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Performance of proposed model and state-of-the-art models.

Article Snippet: Models like FCMIM + SVM and GNB also performed well, with FCMIM + SVM on the Cleveland dataset achieving an accuracy of 92.37%, 89% sensitivity, and 98% specificity and with GNB on the Z-Alizadeh Sani, Statlog, and Cardiovascular disease datasets achieving 95.43%, 93.3%, and 73.2% accuracies, 95.84%, 89.2%, and 69.3% sensitivities, 94.44%, 96.7%, and 77% specificities, and 96.77%, 92.1%, and 71.9% F1 scores.

Techniques: