wearables fitbit one/zip (ActiGraph llc)
90
Structured Review
ActiGraph llc
wearables fitbit one/zip
Wearables Fitbit One/Zip, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fitbit+one/actigraph+gt3x/pm37688071-392-24-27
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Wearables Fitbit One/Zip, supplied by ActiGraph llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fitbit+one/actigraph+gt3x/pm37688071-392-24-27
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wearables fitbit one/zip - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Blocking Assay:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Produced:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); T-Test:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Software:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Derivative Assay:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Activity Assay:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Comparison:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Biomarker Discovery:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Immunocytochemistry:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); Control:Article Title: Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Article Snippet: Objectives: Inexpensive activity monitors have recently gained popularity with the general public.. Researchers have evaluated these consumer-based monitors in laboratory-conditions.. Given the current wide-spread consumer use of these devices, it is important to ensure users are attaining accurate information compared to previously validated measures. Article Title: Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Article Snippet: Lee et al compared the accuracy of consumer monitors (Fitbit One (FO), Fitbit Zip (FZ), Jawbone UP24 (JU)) and one Article Title: The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Article Snippet: Daily step count for all consumer wearables correlated highly with validation criterion, especially the Article Title: Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study Article Snippet: This corresponds to the findings of a study [ ] that compared step count estimation of healthy participants in a free-living setting using a Fitbit device (Fitbit One) and Article Title: Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review Article Snippet: High N/NR 81 Gomersall et al. (2016, Australia) University staff (N=29; 39.6±11 yrs; 90% females; NR) 7 days Fitbit One (belt, bra, pocket; NR; NR; NR); |
