Review





Similar Products

96
Elabscience Biotechnology cd8 percp
Cd8 Percp, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd8 percp/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd8 percp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Elabscience Biotechnology anti cd8 percp
Anti Cd8 Percp, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd8 percp/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd8 percp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Elabscience Biotechnology anti cd8 percp cy5 5
Anti Cd8 Percp Cy5 5, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd8 percp cy5 5/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd8 percp cy5 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Elabscience Biotechnology percp cyanine5 5 anti mouse cd8
a Schematic illustration of the research procedure in subcutaneous HCC mouse model. b Relative tumor volume curves of different treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). c Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). d Quantification of fluorescence intensity in Supplementary Fig. f ( n = 5 independent mice). e Immunofluorescence images of tumor tissue slices collected from different groups stained with anti-F4/80/CD206, anti-F4/80/CD86, and anti-CD11c/MHC II after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). f Quantification of the percentage of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 TAMs, F4/80 + CD86 + M1 TAMs, and CD11c + MHC II + actDCs in ( e ) ( n = 5 independent mice). g Schematic illustration of the research procedure in orthotopic HCC mouse model. h Relative bioluminescence intensity curves for the various treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). i Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). j Flow cytometric analysis of anti-F4/80/CD206-stained macrophages, anti-F4/80/CD86-stained macrophages, anti-CD11c/MHC II-stained DCs, anti-CD3/CD4-stained T cells, <t>anti-CD3/CD8-stained</t> T cells, and anti-CD4/Foxp3-stained T cells in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , d , f , h ) or log-rank test ( c , i ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 7a, g were created by Adobe Illustrator.
Percp Cyanine5 5 Anti Mouse Cd8, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/percp cyanine5 5 anti mouse cd8/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
percp cyanine5 5 anti mouse cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Elabscience Biotechnology anti cd8 antibody
DNase I treatment decreased the number of immune inflammatory cells in the kidneys and spleens of mice in the MRL/lpr model. (A, B) The TIMER algorithm was used to assess the proportion of immune cell infiltration in the kidneys of control (Ctr), MRL/lpr (Lpr), and DNase I-treated MRL/lpr (DNase) mice at 21 weeks of age. The percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cell subsets (C, G) , <t>CD3+CD8+</t> T cell subsets (D, H) , and CD3-CD19+B cell subsets (E, I) in the spleen were quantified using flow cytometry across the normal control, MRL/lpr, and DNase I treatment MRL/lpr group. (F, J) Flow cytometric and quantitative analysis of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell (Treg) percentages in the spleens of mice from each experimental group were also conducted. Data were expressed as means ± SD for groups of three mice. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 vs. normal control ( t test). # P < 0.05 vs. MRL/lpr mice (Bonferroni correction; two comparisons were made).
Anti Cd8 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd8 antibody/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd8 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a Schematic illustration of the research procedure in subcutaneous HCC mouse model. b Relative tumor volume curves of different treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). c Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). d Quantification of fluorescence intensity in Supplementary Fig. f ( n = 5 independent mice). e Immunofluorescence images of tumor tissue slices collected from different groups stained with anti-F4/80/CD206, anti-F4/80/CD86, and anti-CD11c/MHC II after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). f Quantification of the percentage of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 TAMs, F4/80 + CD86 + M1 TAMs, and CD11c + MHC II + actDCs in ( e ) ( n = 5 independent mice). g Schematic illustration of the research procedure in orthotopic HCC mouse model. h Relative bioluminescence intensity curves for the various treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). i Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). j Flow cytometric analysis of anti-F4/80/CD206-stained macrophages, anti-F4/80/CD86-stained macrophages, anti-CD11c/MHC II-stained DCs, anti-CD3/CD4-stained T cells, anti-CD3/CD8-stained T cells, and anti-CD4/Foxp3-stained T cells in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , d , f , h ) or log-rank test ( c , i ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 7a, g were created by Adobe Illustrator.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Co-delivery of sorafenib and an FSP1 inhibitor triggers dual ferroptosis in tumor cells and immunosuppressive macrophages for enhanced immunotherapy in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65056-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of the research procedure in subcutaneous HCC mouse model. b Relative tumor volume curves of different treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). c Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). d Quantification of fluorescence intensity in Supplementary Fig. f ( n = 5 independent mice). e Immunofluorescence images of tumor tissue slices collected from different groups stained with anti-F4/80/CD206, anti-F4/80/CD86, and anti-CD11c/MHC II after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). f Quantification of the percentage of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 TAMs, F4/80 + CD86 + M1 TAMs, and CD11c + MHC II + actDCs in ( e ) ( n = 5 independent mice). g Schematic illustration of the research procedure in orthotopic HCC mouse model. h Relative bioluminescence intensity curves for the various treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). i Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). j Flow cytometric analysis of anti-F4/80/CD206-stained macrophages, anti-F4/80/CD86-stained macrophages, anti-CD11c/MHC II-stained DCs, anti-CD3/CD4-stained T cells, anti-CD3/CD8-stained T cells, and anti-CD4/Foxp3-stained T cells in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , d , f , h ) or log-rank test ( c , i ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 7a, g were created by Adobe Illustrator.

Article Snippet: PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse F4/80 (1:200, #E-AB-F0995J), APC anti-mouse CD206 (1:200, #E-AB-F1135E), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD86 (1:200, #E-AB-F0994H), Fluor Red 780 anti-mouse CD80 (1:200, #E-AB-F0992S), APC anti-mouse CD11c (1:200, #E-AB-F0991E), Fluor Violet 450 anti-mouse CD3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1013Q), Fluor Red 780 anti-mouse CD4 (1:200, #E-AB-F1097S), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD8 (1:200, #E-AB-F1104J), FITC anti-human/mouse CD44 (1:200, #E-AB-F1100C), PE anti-mouse Foxp3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1238D), FITC anti-mouse MHC II (1:200, #E-AB-F0990C), APC anti-mouse CD62L (1:200, #E-AB-F1011E), APC anti-mouse PD-L1 (1:200, #E-AB-F1132E), PerCP anti-human CD45 (1:200, #E-AB-F1137F), Fluor647 anti-human CD68 (1:200, #E-AB-F1299M), FITC anti-human CD206 (1:200, #E-AB-F1161C), PE anti-human CD80 (1:200, #E-AB-F1232D), APC anti-human HLA-DR (1:200, #E-AB-F1111E), PE anti-human CD11c (1:200, #E-AB-F1118D), APC anti-human CD3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1001E), and FITC anti-human CD8 (1:200, #E-AB-F1110C) were purchased from Elabscience (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Fluorescence, Immunofluorescence, Staining

a Flow cytometric analysis of anti-PD-L1-stained cells in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). b Quantification of the percentage of PD-L1 positive cells in ( a ) ( n = 5 independent mice). c Schematic diagram of the mechanism of Sv@PM-M2p-mediated upregulation of PD-L1 within HCC TME. d Schematic illustration of the research procedure in bilateral subcutaneous HCC mouse model. e Representative bioluminescence images of bilateral subcutaneous HCC mice at specific time points with different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). f Relative bioluminescence intensity curves for the various treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). g Flow cytometric analysis of anti-F4/80/CD206-stained macrophages and anti-F4/80/CD86-stained macrophages in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). h Quantification of the percentage of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 TAMs and F4/80 + CD86 + M1 TAMs in ( g ) ( n = 5 independent mice). i Flow cytometric analysis of anti-CD44/CD62L-stained T cells (gated on CD3 + CD8 + T cells) in the spleens after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). j Quantification of the percentage of CD44 + CD62L - memory T cells in ( i ) ( n = 5 independent mice). k The assay of IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, and IL-12 in serum after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , f , h , j , k ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 8c, d were created by Adobe Illustrator.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Co-delivery of sorafenib and an FSP1 inhibitor triggers dual ferroptosis in tumor cells and immunosuppressive macrophages for enhanced immunotherapy in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65056-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Flow cytometric analysis of anti-PD-L1-stained cells in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). b Quantification of the percentage of PD-L1 positive cells in ( a ) ( n = 5 independent mice). c Schematic diagram of the mechanism of Sv@PM-M2p-mediated upregulation of PD-L1 within HCC TME. d Schematic illustration of the research procedure in bilateral subcutaneous HCC mouse model. e Representative bioluminescence images of bilateral subcutaneous HCC mice at specific time points with different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). f Relative bioluminescence intensity curves for the various treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). g Flow cytometric analysis of anti-F4/80/CD206-stained macrophages and anti-F4/80/CD86-stained macrophages in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). h Quantification of the percentage of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 TAMs and F4/80 + CD86 + M1 TAMs in ( g ) ( n = 5 independent mice). i Flow cytometric analysis of anti-CD44/CD62L-stained T cells (gated on CD3 + CD8 + T cells) in the spleens after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). j Quantification of the percentage of CD44 + CD62L - memory T cells in ( i ) ( n = 5 independent mice). k The assay of IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, and IL-12 in serum after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , f , h , j , k ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 8c, d were created by Adobe Illustrator.

Article Snippet: PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse F4/80 (1:200, #E-AB-F0995J), APC anti-mouse CD206 (1:200, #E-AB-F1135E), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD86 (1:200, #E-AB-F0994H), Fluor Red 780 anti-mouse CD80 (1:200, #E-AB-F0992S), APC anti-mouse CD11c (1:200, #E-AB-F0991E), Fluor Violet 450 anti-mouse CD3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1013Q), Fluor Red 780 anti-mouse CD4 (1:200, #E-AB-F1097S), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD8 (1:200, #E-AB-F1104J), FITC anti-human/mouse CD44 (1:200, #E-AB-F1100C), PE anti-mouse Foxp3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1238D), FITC anti-mouse MHC II (1:200, #E-AB-F0990C), APC anti-mouse CD62L (1:200, #E-AB-F1011E), APC anti-mouse PD-L1 (1:200, #E-AB-F1132E), PerCP anti-human CD45 (1:200, #E-AB-F1137F), Fluor647 anti-human CD68 (1:200, #E-AB-F1299M), FITC anti-human CD206 (1:200, #E-AB-F1161C), PE anti-human CD80 (1:200, #E-AB-F1232D), APC anti-human HLA-DR (1:200, #E-AB-F1111E), PE anti-human CD11c (1:200, #E-AB-F1118D), APC anti-human CD3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1001E), and FITC anti-human CD8 (1:200, #E-AB-F1110C) were purchased from Elabscience (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Staining

a Schematic illustration of the research procedure in PDX subcutaneous mouse model. b Relative tumor volume curves of different treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). c Collected tumor tissues of mice at the end of treatment in different groups. d Tumor weight at the end of treatment in different groups ( n = 5 independent mice). e Immunofluorescence images of tumor tissue slices collected from different groups stained with Liperfluo after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). f Quantification of fluorescence intensity in ( e ) ( n = 5 independent mice). g Flow cytometric analysis of anti-CD68/CD206-stained macrophages (gated on CD45 + cells), anti-CD68/CD80-stained macrophages (gated on CD45 + cells), anti-HLA-DR/CD11c-stained DCs (gated on CD45 + Lin-1 – T cells), and anti-CD3/CD8-stained T cells (gated on CD45 + cells) in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). h Quantification of the percentage of CD68 + CD206 + M2 TAMs, CD68 + CD80 + M1 TAMs, HLA-DR + CD11c + actDCs, and CD3 + CD8 + Tc cells in ( g ) ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , d , f , h ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 9a were created by Adobe Illustrator.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Co-delivery of sorafenib and an FSP1 inhibitor triggers dual ferroptosis in tumor cells and immunosuppressive macrophages for enhanced immunotherapy in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65056-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of the research procedure in PDX subcutaneous mouse model. b Relative tumor volume curves of different treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). c Collected tumor tissues of mice at the end of treatment in different groups. d Tumor weight at the end of treatment in different groups ( n = 5 independent mice). e Immunofluorescence images of tumor tissue slices collected from different groups stained with Liperfluo after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). f Quantification of fluorescence intensity in ( e ) ( n = 5 independent mice). g Flow cytometric analysis of anti-CD68/CD206-stained macrophages (gated on CD45 + cells), anti-CD68/CD80-stained macrophages (gated on CD45 + cells), anti-HLA-DR/CD11c-stained DCs (gated on CD45 + Lin-1 – T cells), and anti-CD3/CD8-stained T cells (gated on CD45 + cells) in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). h Quantification of the percentage of CD68 + CD206 + M2 TAMs, CD68 + CD80 + M1 TAMs, HLA-DR + CD11c + actDCs, and CD3 + CD8 + Tc cells in ( g ) ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , d , f , h ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 9a were created by Adobe Illustrator.

Article Snippet: PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse F4/80 (1:200, #E-AB-F0995J), APC anti-mouse CD206 (1:200, #E-AB-F1135E), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD86 (1:200, #E-AB-F0994H), Fluor Red 780 anti-mouse CD80 (1:200, #E-AB-F0992S), APC anti-mouse CD11c (1:200, #E-AB-F0991E), Fluor Violet 450 anti-mouse CD3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1013Q), Fluor Red 780 anti-mouse CD4 (1:200, #E-AB-F1097S), PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD8 (1:200, #E-AB-F1104J), FITC anti-human/mouse CD44 (1:200, #E-AB-F1100C), PE anti-mouse Foxp3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1238D), FITC anti-mouse MHC II (1:200, #E-AB-F0990C), APC anti-mouse CD62L (1:200, #E-AB-F1011E), APC anti-mouse PD-L1 (1:200, #E-AB-F1132E), PerCP anti-human CD45 (1:200, #E-AB-F1137F), Fluor647 anti-human CD68 (1:200, #E-AB-F1299M), FITC anti-human CD206 (1:200, #E-AB-F1161C), PE anti-human CD80 (1:200, #E-AB-F1232D), APC anti-human HLA-DR (1:200, #E-AB-F1111E), PE anti-human CD11c (1:200, #E-AB-F1118D), APC anti-human CD3 (1:200, #E-AB-F1001E), and FITC anti-human CD8 (1:200, #E-AB-F1110C) were purchased from Elabscience (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence

DNase I treatment decreased the number of immune inflammatory cells in the kidneys and spleens of mice in the MRL/lpr model. (A, B) The TIMER algorithm was used to assess the proportion of immune cell infiltration in the kidneys of control (Ctr), MRL/lpr (Lpr), and DNase I-treated MRL/lpr (DNase) mice at 21 weeks of age. The percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cell subsets (C, G) , CD3+CD8+ T cell subsets (D, H) , and CD3-CD19+B cell subsets (E, I) in the spleen were quantified using flow cytometry across the normal control, MRL/lpr, and DNase I treatment MRL/lpr group. (F, J) Flow cytometric and quantitative analysis of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell (Treg) percentages in the spleens of mice from each experimental group were also conducted. Data were expressed as means ± SD for groups of three mice. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 vs. normal control ( t test). # P < 0.05 vs. MRL/lpr mice (Bonferroni correction; two comparisons were made).

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: DNase I alleviates renal inflammatory injury in MRL/lpr mice by inhibiting NETs formation

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1656069

Figure Lengend Snippet: DNase I treatment decreased the number of immune inflammatory cells in the kidneys and spleens of mice in the MRL/lpr model. (A, B) The TIMER algorithm was used to assess the proportion of immune cell infiltration in the kidneys of control (Ctr), MRL/lpr (Lpr), and DNase I-treated MRL/lpr (DNase) mice at 21 weeks of age. The percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cell subsets (C, G) , CD3+CD8+ T cell subsets (D, H) , and CD3-CD19+B cell subsets (E, I) in the spleen were quantified using flow cytometry across the normal control, MRL/lpr, and DNase I treatment MRL/lpr group. (F, J) Flow cytometric and quantitative analysis of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cell (Treg) percentages in the spleens of mice from each experimental group were also conducted. Data were expressed as means ± SD for groups of three mice. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001 vs. normal control ( t test). # P < 0.05 vs. MRL/lpr mice (Bonferroni correction; two comparisons were made).

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were utilized for staining: anti-CD3 antibody (E-AB-F1013Q), anti-CD4 antibody (E-AB-F1097S), anti-CD8 antibody (E-AB-F1104J), anti-CD19 antibody (E-AB-F0986E), anti-CD25 antibody (E-AB-F1102D), and anti-Foxp3 antibody (E-AB-F1238E), all sourced from Elabscience (China).

Techniques: Control, Flow Cytometry