|
Genecopoeia
cd63 orfs Cd63 Orfs, supplied by Genecopoeia, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd63 orfs/product/Genecopoeia Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd63 orfs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd63 m ![]() Cd63 M, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd63 m/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd63 m - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Affinity Biosciences
differentiation 63 cd63 ![]() Differentiation 63 Cd63, supplied by Affinity Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/differentiation 63 cd63/product/Affinity Biosciences Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
differentiation 63 cd63 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
cd63 ![]() Cd63, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd63/product/Proteintech Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd63 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Affinity Biosciences
rabbit polyclonal anti cd63 ![]() Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Cd63, supplied by Affinity Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti cd63/product/Affinity Biosciences Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal anti cd63 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
cd9 ![]() Cd9, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd9/product/Proteintech Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd9 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Abmart Inc
cd63 ![]() Cd63, supplied by Abmart Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd63/product/Abmart Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd63 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Affinity Biosciences
cd63 affinity biosciences ![]() Cd63 Affinity Biosciences, supplied by Affinity Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd63 affinity biosciences/product/Affinity Biosciences Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd63 affinity biosciences - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd
anti cd63 cy38 ![]() Anti Cd63 Cy38, supplied by Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd63 cy38/product/Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd63 cy38 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Inserm Transfert
cd63 ![]() Cd63, supplied by Inserm Transfert, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd63/product/Inserm Transfert Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd63 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Journal of Extracellular Biology
Article Title: Flow Cytometric Detection of Biomarker Changes in CFDA‐SE‐Labelled Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Using a Rodent Pregnancy Model of Prenatal Diagnostics
doi: 10.1002/jex2.70145
Figure Lengend Snippet: Changes in tetraspanin display in plasma EVs during pregnancy . (a–d) Flow cytometry data. Graphs to show proportion of CFDA‐SE positive particles expressing each biomarker. Each spot represents the mean of three technical replicates for one biological replicate, and the bars represent the group mean and standard deviation. p values indicate result of a t test. All samples are normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk test) and of equal variance (Levene test). (e, f) ROC curves derived from the data shown in (a–d). (a, e) CD63 (B). (b, f) CD63 (M). (c, g) CD81. (d, h) CD9. CFDA‐SE, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester; EV, extracellular vesicle; ROC, receiver operator characteristic.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Biomarker Discovery, Standard Deviation, Derivative Assay
Journal: Journal of Sport and Health Science
Article Title: Long-term aerobic exercise enhances circulating exosomal miR-214-3p to promote endothelial progenitor cell-mediated repair of endothelial damage induced by obesity
doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101094
Figure Lengend Snippet: Eight weeks of aerobic exercise improved the proliferation and migration capabilities of circulating EPC in both humans and rats with obesity through circulating exosomes. (A) Representative transmission electron microscopy image of exosomes derived from human peripheral blood. Scale bar = 200 nm. (B) Exosome characterization and identification. Exosomes derived from human peripheral blood express TSG101 and CD63. (C) Nanoparticle tracking analysis confirms the presence of exosomes with a peak diameter of 100 nm, characteristic of exosomal size. Quantitative analysis of exosomes derived from human peripheral blood revealed no statistically significant difference in the number of exosomes isolated from equal volumes of circulating blood between the control group and the exercise group ( n = 30 for each group). (D) Cell proliferation assay results showed that exosomes derived from the exercise group significantly enhanced the proliferative capacity of human EPC compared to those from the control group, as measured by the CCK-8 method ( n = 20 for each group). *** p < 0.001, Exercise vs . Control. (E) Scratch assay results showed that exosomes derived from the exercise group significantly promoted the migratory ability of human EPC compared to those from the control group ( n = 5 for each group). * p < 0.05, Exercise vs . Control. (F) Representative images of wound healing in the scratch assay, showcasing the migratory response of human EPC. (G) Characterization of circulating exosomes from rat peripheral blood. (H) Quantitative analysis of exosomes derived from rat peripheral blood revealed no statistically significant difference in the number of exosomes isolated from equal volumes of circulating blood among all groups ( n = 3 for each group). (I) Cell proliferation assays revealed that exosomes derived from the HC group exhibited a diminished capacity to promote EPC proliferation compared to those from the NC group in rats. In contrast, exosomes induced by 8 weeks of aerobic exercise significantly enhanced EPC proliferation ( n : 5–6 for each group). * p < 0.05, HC vs . NC; ## p < 0.01, HE vs . HC. (J) Scratch assays indicated that exosomes derived from the HC group exhibited a diminished capacity to enhance EPC migration rates compared to those from the NC group in rats. In contrast, exosomes induced by 8 weeks of aerobic exercise significantly enhanced EPC migration rates ( n = 4 for each group). ** p < 0.01, HC vs . NC; ## p < 0.01, HE vs . HC. (K) Representative images of wound healing in the scratch assay, showcasing the migratory response of rat EPC. CCK-8 = cell counting kit-8; CD63 = cluster of differentiation 63; EPC = endothelial progenitor cells; HC = the high-fat diet with sedentary group; HE = the high-fat diet with exercise group; NC = the normal diet with sedentary group; TSG101 = tumor susceptibility gene 101.
Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used included PI3K (SC-365290, 1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), Akt1 (SC-5298, 1:1000; Santa Cruz), p-Akt (Ser473) (66444-1-lg, 1:1000; Proteintech Group, Rosemont, IL, USA), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) (60300-1-Ig, 1:1000; Proteintech), tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) (DF8427, 1:1000;
Techniques: Migration, Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Derivative Assay, Isolation, Control, Proliferation Assay, CCK-8 Assay, Wound Healing Assay, Cell Counting
Journal: Bioactive Materials
Article Title: Microenvironment-educated MSC-EVs loaded injectable smart hydrogel for targeting senescent nucleus pulposus cells and inhibiting ferroptosis against intervertebral disc degeneration
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.030
Figure Lengend Snippet: Senescent Microenvironment-Educated Mesenchymal Stem Cells Release High-Affinity Senescent NPC Domesticated Extracellular Vesicles. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for educating MSCs with SASP-CM to generate D-EVs versus N-EVs. (B) Confocal microscopy images showing different EVs internalization by senescent NPCs after 12 h in vitro. (C) Flow cytometry and quantification analysis of different EVs uptake by senescent NPCs. (D) In vivo validation of the senescent niche. Representative fluorescence images following injection of senescence-tracer (Red). (E) In vivo PKH26-labeled D-EVs tracking. (F) Representative SA-β-Gal images and quantification of MSCs treated with SASP-CM or not. (G) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis confirming enrichment of external encapsulating structure organization and cytokine production in Biological Process (BP) categories. (H) Heatmap indicating gene expression associated with EVs biogenesis within D-MSCs and N-MSCs. (I) Heatmap indicating gene expression associated with cytokine production within D-MSCs and N-MSCs. (J and L) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis confirming enrichment of terms related to vesicle organization and transport in the Cellular Component (CC) categories. (K) Western blot analysis confirmed core senescence markers p16 and p21 and DNA damage marker γ-H2AX in N-MSC and D-MSC. (M) Western blot analysis confirmed the expression of CD9, CD63, TSG101, Calnexin, and GM130 in MSC-EVs, N-EVs, or D-EVs. (N) TEM images showing the morphology and size of MSC-derived EVs, N-EVs, and D-EVs. (O) NTA shows size distribution in MSC-EVs, N-EVs, or D-EVs. The data were presented as mean ± SD. n = 3, ns, not significant; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: After blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 2 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against GAPDH (1:5000, 104941-AP, Proteintech), TSG101 (1:1000, DF8427, Affinity), CD9 (1:1000, AF5139, Affinity),
Techniques: Confocal Microscopy, In Vitro, Flow Cytometry, In Vivo, Biomarker Discovery, Fluorescence, Injection, Labeling, Gene Expression, Western Blot, Marker, Expressing, Derivative Assay
Journal: Bioactive Materials
Article Title: Microenvironment-educated MSC-EVs loaded injectable smart hydrogel for targeting senescent nucleus pulposus cells and inhibiting ferroptosis against intervertebral disc degeneration
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.030
Figure Lengend Snippet: Senescent Microenvironment-Educated Mesenchymal Stem Cells Release High-Affinity Senescent NPC Domesticated Extracellular Vesicles. (A) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for educating MSCs with SASP-CM to generate D-EVs versus N-EVs. (B) Confocal microscopy images showing different EVs internalization by senescent NPCs after 12 h in vitro. (C) Flow cytometry and quantification analysis of different EVs uptake by senescent NPCs. (D) In vivo validation of the senescent niche. Representative fluorescence images following injection of senescence-tracer (Red). (E) In vivo PKH26-labeled D-EVs tracking. (F) Representative SA-β-Gal images and quantification of MSCs treated with SASP-CM or not. (G) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis confirming enrichment of external encapsulating structure organization and cytokine production in Biological Process (BP) categories. (H) Heatmap indicating gene expression associated with EVs biogenesis within D-MSCs and N-MSCs. (I) Heatmap indicating gene expression associated with cytokine production within D-MSCs and N-MSCs. (J and L) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis confirming enrichment of terms related to vesicle organization and transport in the Cellular Component (CC) categories. (K) Western blot analysis confirmed core senescence markers p16 and p21 and DNA damage marker γ-H2AX in N-MSC and D-MSC. (M) Western blot analysis confirmed the expression of CD9, CD63, TSG101, Calnexin, and GM130 in MSC-EVs, N-EVs, or D-EVs. (N) TEM images showing the morphology and size of MSC-derived EVs, N-EVs, and D-EVs. (O) NTA shows size distribution in MSC-EVs, N-EVs, or D-EVs. The data were presented as mean ± SD. n = 3, ns, not significant; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: After blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 2 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against GAPDH (1:5000, 104941-AP, Proteintech), TSG101 (1:1000, DF8427, Affinity),
Techniques: Confocal Microscopy, In Vitro, Flow Cytometry, In Vivo, Biomarker Discovery, Fluorescence, Injection, Labeling, Gene Expression, Western Blot, Marker, Expressing, Derivative Assay
Journal: Journal of Extracellular Biology
Article Title: A Syndecan‐Based Genetic Approach to Coat the Surface of Small Extracellular Vesicles With Nanobodies
doi: 10.1002/jex2.70133
Figure Lengend Snippet: The SDC1‐CTF chimera has a clean sEVs profile (compared to the PTGFRN chimera) and does not significantly influence EV concentration and size. (A) Left, illustrative Western blot of cell lysates (CL), large EVs (lEV) and small EVs (sEV) secreted by HEK293 cells stably expressing SDC1‐CTF and PTGFRN Nef Nb chimeras, as indicated on top. Mock refers to cells transfected with an empty vector, used as negative controls. Blots were probed with anti‐myc antibodies to allow comparison between the chimeras and other sEV markers (syntenin, CD63, CD9) and a negative control (Calnexin). CL correspond to 20.000 cells. EVs were collected from the conditioned media of 3.6 × 10 6 cells. Note the presence of unexpected high‐molecular‐weight signals for the PTGFRN pmNef EVs and CL. Right, histogram illustrating that SDC1‐CTF and PTGFRN chimeras are sorted to sEVs with similar efficiencies. Anti‐myc signals obtained in Western blot for sEV fractions and CL were expressed as a mean of the sEV/CL ratio from 4 independent experiments, as indicated. Bars represent mean values + SEM. Student's t‐test was applied to assess statistical significance. (B) Graphs illustrating particle concentrations and their median size as detected in NTA measurements (ZetaView) for sEV and lEV (obtained by dUC from equal cells amounts after identical culture durations), as indicated. Related to Figure .
Article Snippet: The antibodies against CD9,
Techniques: Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Comparison, Negative Control, High Molecular Weight
Journal: Journal of Extracellular Biology
Article Title: A Syndecan‐Based Genetic Approach to Coat the Surface of Small Extracellular Vesicles With Nanobodies
doi: 10.1002/jex2.70133
Figure Lengend Snippet: Single EV characterization of the small EVs in concentrated conditioned media (CCM sEVs) secreted by cNef HEK293. (A) Schematic representation of the procedure used to concentrate serum‐free conditioned media to obtain concentrated conditioned medium (CCM) sEVs. (B) Representative micrographs obtained for Mock (left) or cNef (right) CCM sEVs by ONI microscopy. Anti‐tetraspanin (CD9, CD63, CD81) signals are in cyan while anti‐Nb signals are in magenta. Scale bars correspond to 800 nm for field view and 200 nm for inserts. (C) Illustrative representation of MRPS measurements with cNef CCM sEVs. Y‐axis represents brightness intensity. X‐axis represents particle diameter. Related to Figure .
Article Snippet: The antibodies against CD9,
Techniques: Microscopy