Review





Similar Products

93
Addgene inc pcdna p65 flag wt mouse addgene addgene
Pcdna P65 Flag Wt Mouse Addgene Addgene, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/RelA+cFlag+pcDNA3+(Plasmid+%2320012)/pm42905514-230-215-216
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pcdna p65 flag wt mouse addgene addgene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Addgene inc ms2 p65 hsf1 gfp
Ms2 P65 Hsf1 Gfp, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/MS2-P65-HSF1_GFP+(Plasmid+%2361423)/pmc13682663-283-31-32
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ms2 p65 hsf1 gfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc tbk1
Tbk1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/Phospho-NF-kappaB+p65+(Ser536)+Rabbit+mAb/pm42892647-235-50-51
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tbk1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech nf κb 224
Nf κb 224, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/NF-%CE%BAB+p65+Polyclonal+antibody/pm42893735-128-69-73
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nf κb 224 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p65
P65, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/NF-kappaB+p65+Rabbit+mAb/pm42892647-235-42-43
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p65 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p nf κb p65 ser536
P Nf κb P65 Ser536, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/Phospho-NF-kappaB+p65+(Ser536)+Rabbit+mAb/pm42888446-183-18-21
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p nf κb p65 ser536 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho nf κb p65
( A ) KEGG enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEGs in Sik2 F/F ; LysM Cre cardiac macrophages on day 3 post-MI. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( B ) DEGs (fold change ≥ 2 and P .adjust ≤ 0.05) overlapped in top 20 of enriched pathways. ( C ) Transcription factor prediction was performed using TRRUST databases. The top 10 transcription factors are listed. ( D ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of <t>P65</t> in the cytoplasm and nucleus of WT and SIK2-knockout PMs and treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) or vehicle ( n = 4) for 1 hour. ( E ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours ( n = 6). ( F ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression ( n = 6). PMs were pretreated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) and stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours. ( G ) WikiPathways enrichment analysis of differentially phosphorylated proteins in PMs treated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) or control. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( H ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of phosphorylated P65 (p-P65), P65, phosphorylated P38 (p-P38), and P38 expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α or vehicle ( n = 6). ( I and J ) Flow cytometry analysis of efferocytosis in WT or LeSik2 Raw264.7 cells [stimulated with SB 203580 (10 μmol) or not] treated with CFSE-prelabeled RBCs ( n = 6).
Phospho Nf κb P65, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/Phospho-NF-kappaB+p65+(Ser536)+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13674512-352-33-39
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phospho nf κb p65 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Addgene inc ms2 p65 hsf1
CRISPRa-mediated activation of endogenous UMOD enables functional testing of knockdown strategies. ( A ) Schematic of the synergistic activation mediator (SAM) system for CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation. <t>MS2-containing</t> sgRNAs target the proximal UMOD promoter and recruit dCas9-VP64 together with the <t>MS2-p65-HSF1</t> (MPH) helper complex. ( B ) Positions of the ten sgRNAs (act_sgRNA1–10) targeting the proximal UMOD promoter. Guides target both strands (arrows) within −20 to −239 bp upstream of the transcription start site (TSS), located within exon 1. ( C ) UMOD expression quantified by ΔΔCt qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-competent HEK293T cells (HEK293T/ dCas9-VP64 + MPH) after transfection with each individual sgRNA, with a combination of all sgRNAs (act_all) or with a combination of the three best-performing guides (act_sgRNA mix). CTL, mock transfection with non-targeting sgRNAs. Data are shown as mean ± SD from n = 3 replicates; experiment was independently repeated (n=2). ( D ) Left: schematic of hUREC isolation from human urine. Right: western blot of hUREC lysates after transfection with act_sgRNA mix or non-targeting sgRNAs, from three activated samples. Recombinant Uromodulin (0.25, 1 and 2.5 fmol) was loaded on the same blot for quantitative reference. β-actin served as loading control. ( E ) Deglycosylation analysis of CRISPRa-activated hURECs. Lysates were mock-treated or digested with Endo H or PNGase F. β-actin served as loading control. ( F ) Schematic of the experimental workflow: 1. base editing for splice-site disruption or stop codon introduction, 2. FACS enrichment of edited cells, 3. CRISPRa activation, and 4. analysis by qRT-PCR or western blot. (G) UMOD mRNA levels quantified by qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following splice-site disruption with seven sgRNA–base editor combinations (SSD_sgRNA1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 with ABE8.20m or BE4max), compared with base editor-only (no_sgRNA_CTL) controls (n = 4 biological replicates). ( H ) Left: Western blot of uromodulin in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following stop codon introduction with STOP_sgRNA1, 3 and 4 and TadCBEd-V106W, compared with base editor-only transfected controls. Right: quantification of uromodulin protein levels (n = 3 biological replicates). β-actin served as loading control. ( G, H ) Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons testing. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Ms2 P65 Hsf1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/MS2-P65-HSF1_GFP+(Plasmid+%2361423)/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__10__15__758759-127-21-22
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ms2 p65 hsf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ABclonal Biotechnology phosphorylated nfκb p65
CRISPRa-mediated activation of endogenous UMOD enables functional testing of knockdown strategies. ( A ) Schematic of the synergistic activation mediator (SAM) system for CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation. <t>MS2-containing</t> sgRNAs target the proximal UMOD promoter and recruit dCas9-VP64 together with the <t>MS2-p65-HSF1</t> (MPH) helper complex. ( B ) Positions of the ten sgRNAs (act_sgRNA1–10) targeting the proximal UMOD promoter. Guides target both strands (arrows) within −20 to −239 bp upstream of the transcription start site (TSS), located within exon 1. ( C ) UMOD expression quantified by ΔΔCt qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-competent HEK293T cells (HEK293T/ dCas9-VP64 + MPH) after transfection with each individual sgRNA, with a combination of all sgRNAs (act_all) or with a combination of the three best-performing guides (act_sgRNA mix). CTL, mock transfection with non-targeting sgRNAs. Data are shown as mean ± SD from n = 3 replicates; experiment was independently repeated (n=2). ( D ) Left: schematic of hUREC isolation from human urine. Right: western blot of hUREC lysates after transfection with act_sgRNA mix or non-targeting sgRNAs, from three activated samples. Recombinant Uromodulin (0.25, 1 and 2.5 fmol) was loaded on the same blot for quantitative reference. β-actin served as loading control. ( E ) Deglycosylation analysis of CRISPRa-activated hURECs. Lysates were mock-treated or digested with Endo H or PNGase F. β-actin served as loading control. ( F ) Schematic of the experimental workflow: 1. base editing for splice-site disruption or stop codon introduction, 2. FACS enrichment of edited cells, 3. CRISPRa activation, and 4. analysis by qRT-PCR or western blot. (G) UMOD mRNA levels quantified by qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following splice-site disruption with seven sgRNA–base editor combinations (SSD_sgRNA1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 with ABE8.20m or BE4max), compared with base editor-only (no_sgRNA_CTL) controls (n = 4 biological replicates). ( H ) Left: Western blot of uromodulin in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following stop codon introduction with STOP_sgRNA1, 3 and 4 and TadCBEd-V106W, compared with base editor-only transfected controls. Right: quantification of uromodulin protein levels (n = 3 biological replicates). β-actin served as loading control. ( G, H ) Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons testing. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Phosphorylated Nfκb P65, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/Phospho-NF-kB+p65-S276+Rabbit+pAb/pm42882508-96-28-32
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phosphorylated nfκb p65 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc nf κb p65
( A ) KEGG enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEGs in Sik2 F/F ; LysM Cre cardiac macrophages on day 3 post-MI. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( B ) DEGs (fold change ≥ 2 and P .adjust ≤ 0.05) overlapped in top 20 of enriched pathways. ( C ) Transcription factor prediction was performed using TRRUST databases. The top 10 transcription factors are listed. ( D ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of <t>P65</t> in the cytoplasm and nucleus of WT and SIK2-knockout PMs and treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) or vehicle ( n = 4) for 1 hour. ( E ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours ( n = 6). ( F ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression ( n = 6). PMs were pretreated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) and stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours. ( G ) WikiPathways enrichment analysis of differentially phosphorylated proteins in PMs treated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) or control. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( H ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of phosphorylated P65 (p-P65), P65, phosphorylated P38 (p-P38), and P38 expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α or vehicle ( n = 6). ( I and J ) Flow cytometry analysis of efferocytosis in WT or LeSik2 Raw264.7 cells [stimulated with SB 203580 (10 μmol) or not] treated with CFSE-prelabeled RBCs ( n = 6).
Nf κb P65, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/p65/NF-kappaB+p65+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13674512-352-40-43
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nf κb p65 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) KEGG enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEGs in Sik2 F/F ; LysM Cre cardiac macrophages on day 3 post-MI. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( B ) DEGs (fold change ≥ 2 and P .adjust ≤ 0.05) overlapped in top 20 of enriched pathways. ( C ) Transcription factor prediction was performed using TRRUST databases. The top 10 transcription factors are listed. ( D ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of P65 in the cytoplasm and nucleus of WT and SIK2-knockout PMs and treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) or vehicle ( n = 4) for 1 hour. ( E ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours ( n = 6). ( F ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression ( n = 6). PMs were pretreated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) and stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours. ( G ) WikiPathways enrichment analysis of differentially phosphorylated proteins in PMs treated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) or control. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( H ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of phosphorylated P65 (p-P65), P65, phosphorylated P38 (p-P38), and P38 expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α or vehicle ( n = 6). ( I and J ) Flow cytometry analysis of efferocytosis in WT or LeSik2 Raw264.7 cells [stimulated with SB 203580 (10 μmol) or not] treated with CFSE-prelabeled RBCs ( n = 6).

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: SIK2 antagonizes postinfarction cardiac repair by driving macrophage proinflammatory and impairing efferocytosis

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw6624

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) KEGG enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEGs in Sik2 F/F ; LysM Cre cardiac macrophages on day 3 post-MI. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( B ) DEGs (fold change ≥ 2 and P .adjust ≤ 0.05) overlapped in top 20 of enriched pathways. ( C ) Transcription factor prediction was performed using TRRUST databases. The top 10 transcription factors are listed. ( D ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of P65 in the cytoplasm and nucleus of WT and SIK2-knockout PMs and treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) or vehicle ( n = 4) for 1 hour. ( E ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours ( n = 6). ( F ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression ( n = 6). PMs were pretreated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) and stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours. ( G ) WikiPathways enrichment analysis of differentially phosphorylated proteins in PMs treated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) or control. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( H ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of phosphorylated P65 (p-P65), P65, phosphorylated P38 (p-P38), and P38 expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α or vehicle ( n = 6). ( I and J ) Flow cytometry analysis of efferocytosis in WT or LeSik2 Raw264.7 cells [stimulated with SB 203580 (10 μmol) or not] treated with CFSE-prelabeled RBCs ( n = 6).

Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used to specifically detect the proteins of interest were as follows: SIK2 (6919s, CST), GAPDH (G9545, Sigma-Aldrich), α-SMA (A5228, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen I (AB765P, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen III (AB7778, Abcam), CD31 (3528s, CST), Phospho-NF-κB P65 (Ser 536 ) (3033s, CST), NF-κB P65 (8242s, CST), Phospho-P38 MAPK (Thr 180 /Tyr 182 ) (4511s, CST), P38 MAPK (8690s, CST), α-Tubulin (66031-1, Proteintech), Histone H3 (68345-1, Proteintech), NOS2 (13120s, CST), FLAG-Tag (14793s, CST), HA-Tag (3724s, CST), TRAF1 (4710s, CST), TRAF2 (4724s, CST), TRAF4 (18527s, CST), TRAF6 (67591s, CST), His-Tag (12698s, CST), and Myc-Tag (2276s, CST).

Techniques: Analysis, Western Blot, Knock-Out, Expressing, Control, Flow Cytometry, Significance Assay

( A ) Venn diagram delineating the intersection of SIK2-binding protein candidates in the top enriched pathways identified in , that is, NF-κB signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. ( B ) Top proteins interacting with SIK2 identified through mass spectrometry analysis of peptides pulled down using anti-Flag antibody in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2. ( C ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 using anti-Flag antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. HA, hemagglutinin. ( D and E ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 and HA-Traf2 using anti-Flag (D) or anti-HA (E) antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. FL, full length. ( F ) Immunoprecipitation (IP) in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and truncated Flag-Sik2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting (IB) with corresponding antibodies. ( G ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells cotransfected with Flag-Sik2 and truncated HA-Traf2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. ( H ) Western blotting analysis and quantification of SIK2, TRAF2, p-P38, P38, p-P65, and P65 expression in HEK293T cells transfected with SIK2 and si-TRAF2 or control ( n = 4). ( I ) Coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and His-Ub, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant. ( J ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and Flag-Sik2, along with Myc-K48-Ub or Myc-K63-Ub. ( K ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 phosphate serine (p-Ser) and phosphate threonine (p-Thr) in HEK293T cells transfected with HA-Traf2, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: SIK2 antagonizes postinfarction cardiac repair by driving macrophage proinflammatory and impairing efferocytosis

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw6624

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Venn diagram delineating the intersection of SIK2-binding protein candidates in the top enriched pathways identified in , that is, NF-κB signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. ( B ) Top proteins interacting with SIK2 identified through mass spectrometry analysis of peptides pulled down using anti-Flag antibody in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2. ( C ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 using anti-Flag antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. HA, hemagglutinin. ( D and E ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 and HA-Traf2 using anti-Flag (D) or anti-HA (E) antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. FL, full length. ( F ) Immunoprecipitation (IP) in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and truncated Flag-Sik2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting (IB) with corresponding antibodies. ( G ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells cotransfected with Flag-Sik2 and truncated HA-Traf2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. ( H ) Western blotting analysis and quantification of SIK2, TRAF2, p-P38, P38, p-P65, and P65 expression in HEK293T cells transfected with SIK2 and si-TRAF2 or control ( n = 4). ( I ) Coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and His-Ub, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant. ( J ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and Flag-Sik2, along with Myc-K48-Ub or Myc-K63-Ub. ( K ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 phosphate serine (p-Ser) and phosphate threonine (p-Thr) in HEK293T cells transfected with HA-Traf2, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant.

Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used to specifically detect the proteins of interest were as follows: SIK2 (6919s, CST), GAPDH (G9545, Sigma-Aldrich), α-SMA (A5228, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen I (AB765P, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen III (AB7778, Abcam), CD31 (3528s, CST), Phospho-NF-κB P65 (Ser 536 ) (3033s, CST), NF-κB P65 (8242s, CST), Phospho-P38 MAPK (Thr 180 /Tyr 182 ) (4511s, CST), P38 MAPK (8690s, CST), α-Tubulin (66031-1, Proteintech), Histone H3 (68345-1, Proteintech), NOS2 (13120s, CST), FLAG-Tag (14793s, CST), HA-Tag (3724s, CST), TRAF1 (4710s, CST), TRAF2 (4724s, CST), TRAF4 (18527s, CST), TRAF6 (67591s, CST), His-Tag (12698s, CST), and Myc-Tag (2276s, CST).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Analysis, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Mutagenesis, Tandem Mass Spectroscopy

CRISPRa-mediated activation of endogenous UMOD enables functional testing of knockdown strategies. ( A ) Schematic of the synergistic activation mediator (SAM) system for CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation. MS2-containing sgRNAs target the proximal UMOD promoter and recruit dCas9-VP64 together with the MS2-p65-HSF1 (MPH) helper complex. ( B ) Positions of the ten sgRNAs (act_sgRNA1–10) targeting the proximal UMOD promoter. Guides target both strands (arrows) within −20 to −239 bp upstream of the transcription start site (TSS), located within exon 1. ( C ) UMOD expression quantified by ΔΔCt qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-competent HEK293T cells (HEK293T/ dCas9-VP64 + MPH) after transfection with each individual sgRNA, with a combination of all sgRNAs (act_all) or with a combination of the three best-performing guides (act_sgRNA mix). CTL, mock transfection with non-targeting sgRNAs. Data are shown as mean ± SD from n = 3 replicates; experiment was independently repeated (n=2). ( D ) Left: schematic of hUREC isolation from human urine. Right: western blot of hUREC lysates after transfection with act_sgRNA mix or non-targeting sgRNAs, from three activated samples. Recombinant Uromodulin (0.25, 1 and 2.5 fmol) was loaded on the same blot for quantitative reference. β-actin served as loading control. ( E ) Deglycosylation analysis of CRISPRa-activated hURECs. Lysates were mock-treated or digested with Endo H or PNGase F. β-actin served as loading control. ( F ) Schematic of the experimental workflow: 1. base editing for splice-site disruption or stop codon introduction, 2. FACS enrichment of edited cells, 3. CRISPRa activation, and 4. analysis by qRT-PCR or western blot. (G) UMOD mRNA levels quantified by qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following splice-site disruption with seven sgRNA–base editor combinations (SSD_sgRNA1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 with ABE8.20m or BE4max), compared with base editor-only (no_sgRNA_CTL) controls (n = 4 biological replicates). ( H ) Left: Western blot of uromodulin in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following stop codon introduction with STOP_sgRNA1, 3 and 4 and TadCBEd-V106W, compared with base editor-only transfected controls. Right: quantification of uromodulin protein levels (n = 3 biological replicates). β-actin served as loading control. ( G, H ) Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons testing. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Base Editing as a Therapeutic Strategy for Autosomal Dominant Tubulointerstitial Kidney Disease caused by Pathogenic UMOD Variants

doi: 10.64898/2026.10.15.758759

Figure Lengend Snippet: CRISPRa-mediated activation of endogenous UMOD enables functional testing of knockdown strategies. ( A ) Schematic of the synergistic activation mediator (SAM) system for CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation. MS2-containing sgRNAs target the proximal UMOD promoter and recruit dCas9-VP64 together with the MS2-p65-HSF1 (MPH) helper complex. ( B ) Positions of the ten sgRNAs (act_sgRNA1–10) targeting the proximal UMOD promoter. Guides target both strands (arrows) within −20 to −239 bp upstream of the transcription start site (TSS), located within exon 1. ( C ) UMOD expression quantified by ΔΔCt qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-competent HEK293T cells (HEK293T/ dCas9-VP64 + MPH) after transfection with each individual sgRNA, with a combination of all sgRNAs (act_all) or with a combination of the three best-performing guides (act_sgRNA mix). CTL, mock transfection with non-targeting sgRNAs. Data are shown as mean ± SD from n = 3 replicates; experiment was independently repeated (n=2). ( D ) Left: schematic of hUREC isolation from human urine. Right: western blot of hUREC lysates after transfection with act_sgRNA mix or non-targeting sgRNAs, from three activated samples. Recombinant Uromodulin (0.25, 1 and 2.5 fmol) was loaded on the same blot for quantitative reference. β-actin served as loading control. ( E ) Deglycosylation analysis of CRISPRa-activated hURECs. Lysates were mock-treated or digested with Endo H or PNGase F. β-actin served as loading control. ( F ) Schematic of the experimental workflow: 1. base editing for splice-site disruption or stop codon introduction, 2. FACS enrichment of edited cells, 3. CRISPRa activation, and 4. analysis by qRT-PCR or western blot. (G) UMOD mRNA levels quantified by qRT-PCR in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following splice-site disruption with seven sgRNA–base editor combinations (SSD_sgRNA1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 with ABE8.20m or BE4max), compared with base editor-only (no_sgRNA_CTL) controls (n = 4 biological replicates). ( H ) Left: Western blot of uromodulin in CRISPRa-activated HEK293T cells following stop codon introduction with STOP_sgRNA1, 3 and 4 and TadCBEd-V106W, compared with base editor-only transfected controls. Right: quantification of uromodulin protein levels (n = 3 biological replicates). β-actin served as loading control. ( G, H ) Data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons testing. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

Article Snippet: A total of 5 × 10 5 cells were electroporated per sample with 5μg plasmid DNA comprising dCas9-VP64 (Addgene plasmid #61422), MS2-p65-HSF1 (Addgene plasmid #61423), and the act_sgRNA mix at a 1:1:1 mass ratio.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Functional Assay, Knockdown, CRISPR, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection, Isolation, Western Blot, Recombinant, Control, Analysis, Disruption, FACS

( A ) KEGG enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEGs in Sik2 F/F ; LysM Cre cardiac macrophages on day 3 post-MI. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( B ) DEGs (fold change ≥ 2 and P .adjust ≤ 0.05) overlapped in top 20 of enriched pathways. ( C ) Transcription factor prediction was performed using TRRUST databases. The top 10 transcription factors are listed. ( D ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of P65 in the cytoplasm and nucleus of WT and SIK2-knockout PMs and treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) or vehicle ( n = 4) for 1 hour. ( E ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours ( n = 6). ( F ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression ( n = 6). PMs were pretreated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) and stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours. ( G ) WikiPathways enrichment analysis of differentially phosphorylated proteins in PMs treated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) or control. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( H ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of phosphorylated P65 (p-P65), P65, phosphorylated P38 (p-P38), and P38 expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α or vehicle ( n = 6). ( I and J ) Flow cytometry analysis of efferocytosis in WT or LeSik2 Raw264.7 cells [stimulated with SB 203580 (10 μmol) or not] treated with CFSE-prelabeled RBCs ( n = 6).

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: SIK2 antagonizes postinfarction cardiac repair by driving macrophage proinflammatory and impairing efferocytosis

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw6624

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) KEGG enrichment analysis of down-regulated DEGs in Sik2 F/F ; LysM Cre cardiac macrophages on day 3 post-MI. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( B ) DEGs (fold change ≥ 2 and P .adjust ≤ 0.05) overlapped in top 20 of enriched pathways. ( C ) Transcription factor prediction was performed using TRRUST databases. The top 10 transcription factors are listed. ( D ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of P65 in the cytoplasm and nucleus of WT and SIK2-knockout PMs and treated with TNF-α (20 ng/ml) or vehicle ( n = 4) for 1 hour. ( E ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours ( n = 6). ( F ) qPCR analysis of Il-1β , Il-6 , Nos2 , Cxcl-1 , and Mmp-9 mRNA expression ( n = 6). PMs were pretreated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) and stimulated with TNF-α for 24 hours. ( G ) WikiPathways enrichment analysis of differentially phosphorylated proteins in PMs treated with ARN3236 (3 μmol) or control. The top 20 enriched pathways are listed. ( H ) Immunoblotting analysis and quantification of phosphorylated P65 (p-P65), P65, phosphorylated P38 (p-P38), and P38 expression in WT and SIK2-knockout PMs stimulated with TNF-α or vehicle ( n = 6). ( I and J ) Flow cytometry analysis of efferocytosis in WT or LeSik2 Raw264.7 cells [stimulated with SB 203580 (10 μmol) or not] treated with CFSE-prelabeled RBCs ( n = 6).

Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used to specifically detect the proteins of interest were as follows: SIK2 (6919s, CST), GAPDH (G9545, Sigma-Aldrich), α-SMA (A5228, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen I (AB765P, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen III (AB7778, Abcam), CD31 (3528s, CST), Phospho-NF-κB P65 (Ser 536 ) (3033s, CST), NF-κB P65 (8242s, CST), Phospho-P38 MAPK (Thr 180 /Tyr 182 ) (4511s, CST), P38 MAPK (8690s, CST), α-Tubulin (66031-1, Proteintech), Histone H3 (68345-1, Proteintech), NOS2 (13120s, CST), FLAG-Tag (14793s, CST), HA-Tag (3724s, CST), TRAF1 (4710s, CST), TRAF2 (4724s, CST), TRAF4 (18527s, CST), TRAF6 (67591s, CST), His-Tag (12698s, CST), and Myc-Tag (2276s, CST).

Techniques: Analysis, Western Blot, Knock-Out, Expressing, Control, Flow Cytometry, Significance Assay

( A ) Venn diagram delineating the intersection of SIK2-binding protein candidates in the top enriched pathways identified in , that is, NF-κB signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. ( B ) Top proteins interacting with SIK2 identified through mass spectrometry analysis of peptides pulled down using anti-Flag antibody in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2. ( C ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 using anti-Flag antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. HA, hemagglutinin. ( D and E ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 and HA-Traf2 using anti-Flag (D) or anti-HA (E) antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. FL, full length. ( F ) Immunoprecipitation (IP) in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and truncated Flag-Sik2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting (IB) with corresponding antibodies. ( G ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells cotransfected with Flag-Sik2 and truncated HA-Traf2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. ( H ) Western blotting analysis and quantification of SIK2, TRAF2, p-P38, P38, p-P65, and P65 expression in HEK293T cells transfected with SIK2 and si-TRAF2 or control ( n = 4). ( I ) Coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and His-Ub, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant. ( J ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and Flag-Sik2, along with Myc-K48-Ub or Myc-K63-Ub. ( K ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 phosphate serine (p-Ser) and phosphate threonine (p-Thr) in HEK293T cells transfected with HA-Traf2, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: SIK2 antagonizes postinfarction cardiac repair by driving macrophage proinflammatory and impairing efferocytosis

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw6624

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Venn diagram delineating the intersection of SIK2-binding protein candidates in the top enriched pathways identified in , that is, NF-κB signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. LC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. ( B ) Top proteins interacting with SIK2 identified through mass spectrometry analysis of peptides pulled down using anti-Flag antibody in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2. ( C ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 using anti-Flag antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. HA, hemagglutinin. ( D and E ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-Sik2 and HA-Traf2 using anti-Flag (D) or anti-HA (E) antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. FL, full length. ( F ) Immunoprecipitation (IP) in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and truncated Flag-Sik2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting (IB) with corresponding antibodies. ( G ) Immunoprecipitation in HEK293T cells cotransfected with Flag-Sik2 and truncated HA-Traf2 using an anti-HA antibody, followed by immunoblotting with corresponding antibodies. ( H ) Western blotting analysis and quantification of SIK2, TRAF2, p-P38, P38, p-P65, and P65 expression in HEK293T cells transfected with SIK2 and si-TRAF2 or control ( n = 4). ( I ) Coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and His-Ub, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant. ( J ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 ubiquitination in HEK293T cells cotransfected with HA-Traf2 and Flag-Sik2, along with Myc-K48-Ub or Myc-K63-Ub. ( K ) Co-IP analysis of TRAF2 phosphate serine (p-Ser) and phosphate threonine (p-Thr) in HEK293T cells transfected with HA-Traf2, along with Flag-Sik2 or Flag-Sik2 T175A mutant.

Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used to specifically detect the proteins of interest were as follows: SIK2 (6919s, CST), GAPDH (G9545, Sigma-Aldrich), α-SMA (A5228, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen I (AB765P, Sigma-Aldrich), Collagen III (AB7778, Abcam), CD31 (3528s, CST), Phospho-NF-κB P65 (Ser 536 ) (3033s, CST), NF-κB P65 (8242s, CST), Phospho-P38 MAPK (Thr 180 /Tyr 182 ) (4511s, CST), P38 MAPK (8690s, CST), α-Tubulin (66031-1, Proteintech), Histone H3 (68345-1, Proteintech), NOS2 (13120s, CST), FLAG-Tag (14793s, CST), HA-Tag (3724s, CST), TRAF1 (4710s, CST), TRAF2 (4724s, CST), TRAF4 (18527s, CST), TRAF6 (67591s, CST), His-Tag (12698s, CST), and Myc-Tag (2276s, CST).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Analysis, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Mutagenesis, Tandem Mass Spectroscopy