Review



custom made matlab software  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc custom made matlab software
    Custom Made Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 325 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+2021b/MATLAB+Compiler/pm40320555-98-9-10
    Average 96 stars, based on 325 article reviews
    custom made matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: An Integrated Framework for Automated Image Segmentation and Personalized Wall Stress Estimation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
    Article Snippet: The script can be compiled into a standalone executable (e.g., via MATLAB Compiler) that runs with the free MATLAB Runtime, so end users do not require a MATLAB license [45].

    Article Title: Autophagy dysfunction in iPSCs-derived neurons and midbrain organoids carrying a SNCA triplication.
    Article Snippet: Neural stat compiler files were used for data analysis in MATLAB.

    Article Title: An Integrated Framework for Automated Image Segmentation and Personalized Wall Stress Estimation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Article Snippet: The script can be compiled into a standalone executable (e.g., via MATLAB Compiler) that runs with the free MATLAB Runtime, so end users do not require a MATLAB license [ ].

    Generated:

    Article Title: WAH- i : Optimising Microphone Array Geometry for Customised Localisation Accuracy
    Article Snippet: .. To support deployment beyond a MATLAB development environment, standalone executables were generated using the MATLAB Compiler ( ). ..

    Analysis:

    Article Title: Thiolactone ring dynamics in dimeric lipids enable pH-switchable supramolecular tuning in surface-engineered quantum dots.
    Article Snippet: aSchool of Applied and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata 700032, India.. bDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Berhampur, Ganjam, Odisha 760003, India cSchool of Materials Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata 700032, India.. dDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.

    Software:

    Article Title: Thiolactone ring dynamics in dimeric lipids enable pH-switchable supramolecular tuning in surface-engineered quantum dots.
    Article Snippet: aSchool of Applied and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata 700032, India.. bDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Berhampur, Ganjam, Odisha 760003, India cSchool of Materials Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata 700032, India.. dDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.



    Similar Products

    fmincon in matlab 2021b  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc fmincon in matlab 2021b
    Fmincon In Matlab 2021b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+2021b/pmc12279372-352-13-18
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fmincon in matlab 2021b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    matlab 2021b  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc matlab 2021b
    Enhanced coherence of CR condition at the alpha frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and SMA (FCz) at the alpha frequency band was observed in the CR condition during both training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels, or areas in either motor skill acquisition or transfer. ( c) Detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and FCz over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the alpha frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, the 10th block exhibited enhanced coherence that significantly differed from the first block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) Enhanced coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and FCz at the alpha frequency band in the non-trained hand was observed after training compared to the baseline in the CR condition. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using <t>MATLAB</t> <t>2021b.</t>
    Matlab 2021b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+2021b/pmc12276337-99-5-5
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab 2021b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    matlab v. 2021b  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc matlab v. 2021b
    Enhanced coherence of CR condition at the alpha frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and SMA (FCz) at the alpha frequency band was observed in the CR condition during both training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels, or areas in either motor skill acquisition or transfer. ( c) Detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and FCz over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the alpha frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, the 10th block exhibited enhanced coherence that significantly differed from the first block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) Enhanced coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and FCz at the alpha frequency band in the non-trained hand was observed after training compared to the baseline in the CR condition. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using <t>MATLAB</t> <t>2021b.</t>
    Matlab V. 2021b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+2021b/pm40633339-150-8-10
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab v. 2021b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    software matlab 2021b  (MathWorks Inc)
    90
    MathWorks Inc software matlab 2021b
    Enhanced coherence of CR condition at the alpha frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and SMA (FCz) at the alpha frequency band was observed in the CR condition during both training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels, or areas in either motor skill acquisition or transfer. ( c) Detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and FCz over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the alpha frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, the 10th block exhibited enhanced coherence that significantly differed from the first block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) Enhanced coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and FCz at the alpha frequency band in the non-trained hand was observed after training compared to the baseline in the CR condition. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using <t>MATLAB</t> <t>2021b.</t>
    Software Matlab 2021b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/matlab+2021b/pm40624817-75-6-11
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    software matlab 2021b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Enhanced coherence of CR condition at the alpha frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and SMA (FCz) at the alpha frequency band was observed in the CR condition during both training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels, or areas in either motor skill acquisition or transfer. ( c) Detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and FCz over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the alpha frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, the 10th block exhibited enhanced coherence that significantly differed from the first block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) Enhanced coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and FCz at the alpha frequency band in the non-trained hand was observed after training compared to the baseline in the CR condition. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11943-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced coherence of CR condition at the alpha frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and SMA (FCz) at the alpha frequency band was observed in the CR condition during both training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels, or areas in either motor skill acquisition or transfer. ( c) Detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and FCz over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the alpha frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, the 10th block exhibited enhanced coherence that significantly differed from the first block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) Enhanced coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and FCz at the alpha frequency band in the non-trained hand was observed after training compared to the baseline in the CR condition. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Article Snippet: The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Standard Deviation, Generated

    Enhanced coherence in the CL condition at the theta frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and centroparietal regions (CPz) at the theta frequency band was observed in both training (pre-test vs. post-test), training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages only in the CL condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels or regions in either transfer or practice. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and CPz over 10 blocks of training in the CL condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each training block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 5, 6 and 10 exhibited enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and CPz at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced right hand in the CL condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11943-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced coherence in the CL condition at the theta frequency band. The left central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the central motor area (C1, C3, C5) and centroparietal regions (CPz) at the theta frequency band was observed in both training (pre-test vs. post-test), training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages only in the CL condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed between the right central motor area (C2, C4, C6) and other channels or regions in either transfer or practice. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between C1, C3, C5, and CPz over 10 blocks of training in the CL condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each training block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 5, 6 and 10 exhibited enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between C1, C3, C5, and CPz at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced right hand in the CL condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Article Snippet: The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Standard Deviation, Generated

    Enhanced coherence in the CR condition at the theta frequency band. The left frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and right frontal regions (F2, F4, F6, F8) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and centroparietal regions (CP1, CP3, CP5) at the theta frequency band was observed during both the training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages exclusively in the CR condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed in the right frontal area (F2, F4, F6, F8) or other channels or areas. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 3, 4 and 10 showed enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced left hand in the CR condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11943-6

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Enhanced coherence in the CR condition at the theta frequency band. The left frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and right frontal regions (F2, F4, F6, F8) were used as seed regions, respectively. ( a) Enhanced coherence in the frontal (F1, F3, F5, F7) and centroparietal regions (CP1, CP3, CP5) at the theta frequency band was observed during both the training (over 10 blocks) and transfer stages exclusively in the CR condition. ( b) No changes in coherence strength were observed in the right frontal area (F2, F4, F6, F8) or other channels or areas. ( c) The detailed coherence value changes between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 over 10 blocks of training in the CR condition at the theta frequency band are shown. The x-axis represents the 10 training blocks, and the y-axis indicates the coherence value strength (0–1) for each block. Using the first training block as the baseline, block 3, 4 and 10 showed enhanced coherence compared to the first training block. T1-T10 illustrates the dynamic changes in coherence from the 1 st block to the 10th block. Asterisks (*) indicate the training blocks that exhibit significant differences in performance compared to the first block, as determined by Dunnett’s post-hoc analysis. ( d) The coherence strength between F1, F3, F5, F7, and CP1, CP3, CP5 at the theta frequency band was significantly enhanced during the post-test of the non-practiced left hand in the CR condition, compared to the pre-test. Error bars denote one standard deviation (SD) across participants. * p < 0.05. The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Article Snippet: The image was generated using MATLAB 2021b.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Standard Deviation, Generated