sod2 Search Results


94
R&D Systems superoxide dismutase sod
Superoxide Dismutase Sod, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/Human%2FMouse%2FRatTotal+SOD2%2FMn-SOD+DuoSet+IC+ELISA/pmc07642041-103-42-46
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superoxide dismutase sod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals sod2
Figure 3. Increased oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways are ameliorated by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment in DOX‑induced cardiomyopathy in mice. (A) AC16 cells treated with different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). (B) AC16 cells were treated with 1 µM DOX and different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). ****P<0.0001 vs. Control group; #P<0.05 and ####P<0.0001 vs. DOX‑only group; &&&P<0.001 vs. DOX + 25 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group; @@P<0.01 vs. DOX + 50 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group. (C) Levels of reactive oxygen species and (D) densitometric analysis in AC16 cells after treatment with DOX or DOX + 1,25(OH)2D3 via DCFH‑DA staining (n=5). *P<0.05 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Control; ###P<0.001 vs. DOX group. Levels of (E) MDA, (F) T‑SOD and (G) GSH‑Px in cardiac tissue 4 weeks after the first injection of DOX (n=5). (H) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of SOD1, <t>SOD2,</t> Nrf2 and KEAP1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (I) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densitometric analysis (n=3). (J) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (K) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densi‑ tometric analysis (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Sham; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 and ####P<0.001 vs. DOX. DOX, doxorubicin hydrochloride; CCK‑8, Cell Counting Kit‑8; ns, no significant difference; DCFH‑DA, 2',7'‑dichlorofluorescin diacetate; MDA, malondialdehyde; T, total; GSH‑Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear erythroid 2‑related factor 2; KEAP1, Kelch‑like ECH‑associated protein 1; ASC, caspase recruitment domain; NLRP3, nod‑like receptor family pyrin domain‑containing 3 inflammasome.
Sod2, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD2%2FMn-SOD+Antibody/pm37559932-109-55-60
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sod2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene pmnsod plasmid
Figure 3. Increased oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways are ameliorated by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment in DOX‑induced cardiomyopathy in mice. (A) AC16 cells treated with different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). (B) AC16 cells were treated with 1 µM DOX and different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). ****P<0.0001 vs. Control group; #P<0.05 and ####P<0.0001 vs. DOX‑only group; &&&P<0.001 vs. DOX + 25 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group; @@P<0.01 vs. DOX + 50 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group. (C) Levels of reactive oxygen species and (D) densitometric analysis in AC16 cells after treatment with DOX or DOX + 1,25(OH)2D3 via DCFH‑DA staining (n=5). *P<0.05 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Control; ###P<0.001 vs. DOX group. Levels of (E) MDA, (F) T‑SOD and (G) GSH‑Px in cardiac tissue 4 weeks after the first injection of DOX (n=5). (H) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of SOD1, <t>SOD2,</t> Nrf2 and KEAP1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (I) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densitometric analysis (n=3). (J) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (K) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densi‑ tometric analysis (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Sham; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 and ####P<0.001 vs. DOX. DOX, doxorubicin hydrochloride; CCK‑8, Cell Counting Kit‑8; ns, no significant difference; DCFH‑DA, 2',7'‑dichlorofluorescin diacetate; MDA, malondialdehyde; T, total; GSH‑Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear erythroid 2‑related factor 2; KEAP1, Kelch‑like ECH‑associated protein 1; ASC, caspase recruitment domain; NLRP3, nod‑like receptor family pyrin domain‑containing 3 inflammasome.
Pmnsod Plasmid, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/Sod2+(NM_017051)+Rat+Tagged+ORF+Clone/pm27384484-206-1-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pmnsod plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals α sod2
Figure 3. Increased oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways are ameliorated by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment in DOX‑induced cardiomyopathy in mice. (A) AC16 cells treated with different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). (B) AC16 cells were treated with 1 µM DOX and different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). ****P<0.0001 vs. Control group; #P<0.05 and ####P<0.0001 vs. DOX‑only group; &&&P<0.001 vs. DOX + 25 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group; @@P<0.01 vs. DOX + 50 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group. (C) Levels of reactive oxygen species and (D) densitometric analysis in AC16 cells after treatment with DOX or DOX + 1,25(OH)2D3 via DCFH‑DA staining (n=5). *P<0.05 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Control; ###P<0.001 vs. DOX group. Levels of (E) MDA, (F) T‑SOD and (G) GSH‑Px in cardiac tissue 4 weeks after the first injection of DOX (n=5). (H) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of SOD1, <t>SOD2,</t> Nrf2 and KEAP1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (I) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densitometric analysis (n=3). (J) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (K) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densi‑ tometric analysis (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Sham; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 and ####P<0.001 vs. DOX. DOX, doxorubicin hydrochloride; CCK‑8, Cell Counting Kit‑8; ns, no significant difference; DCFH‑DA, 2',7'‑dichlorofluorescin diacetate; MDA, malondialdehyde; T, total; GSH‑Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear erythroid 2‑related factor 2; KEAP1, Kelch‑like ECH‑associated protein 1; ASC, caspase recruitment domain; NLRP3, nod‑like receptor family pyrin domain‑containing 3 inflammasome.
α Sod2, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD2%2FMn-SOD+Antibody/pmc07591072-239-23-26
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
α sod2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti superoxide dismutase sod 2
Figure 3. Increased oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways are ameliorated by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment in DOX‑induced cardiomyopathy in mice. (A) AC16 cells treated with different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). (B) AC16 cells were treated with 1 µM DOX and different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). ****P<0.0001 vs. Control group; #P<0.05 and ####P<0.0001 vs. DOX‑only group; &&&P<0.001 vs. DOX + 25 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group; @@P<0.01 vs. DOX + 50 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group. (C) Levels of reactive oxygen species and (D) densitometric analysis in AC16 cells after treatment with DOX or DOX + 1,25(OH)2D3 via DCFH‑DA staining (n=5). *P<0.05 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Control; ###P<0.001 vs. DOX group. Levels of (E) MDA, (F) T‑SOD and (G) GSH‑Px in cardiac tissue 4 weeks after the first injection of DOX (n=5). (H) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of SOD1, <t>SOD2,</t> Nrf2 and KEAP1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (I) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densitometric analysis (n=3). (J) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (K) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densi‑ tometric analysis (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Sham; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 and ####P<0.001 vs. DOX. DOX, doxorubicin hydrochloride; CCK‑8, Cell Counting Kit‑8; ns, no significant difference; DCFH‑DA, 2',7'‑dichlorofluorescin diacetate; MDA, malondialdehyde; T, total; GSH‑Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear erythroid 2‑related factor 2; KEAP1, Kelch‑like ECH‑associated protein 1; ASC, caspase recruitment domain; NLRP3, nod‑like receptor family pyrin domain‑containing 3 inflammasome.
Anti Superoxide Dismutase Sod 2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD2+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pm41855087-48-15-29
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti superoxide dismutase sod 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc sod2 d9v9c rabbit mab
SOD1 and <t>SOD2</t> protein expression. Western blotting analysis of superoxide enzymes cytosolic type 1 and mitochondrial type 2 was performed on young and elderly myoblasts and myotubes. β -Actin content was used for normalization. Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d) show SOD1 and SOD2 densitometric analysis of Western blots performed on three young and three old samples expressed as mean ± SEM. Representative patterns of SOD1, SOD2, and β -actin (as loading control) expression in young and elderly myoblasts and myotubes are shown in panels (e) and (f). The bands were taken from two nonadjacent lanes originating from exactly the same gel and blot with exactly the same exposure time, but spliced together indicated with double-dotted lines. Moreover, we performed no change in contrast ( ∗ p ≤ 0.05).
Sod2 D9v9c Rabbit Mab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD2+Rabbit+mAb/pmc06081572-76-35-41
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sod2 d9v9c rabbit mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Creative BioMart sod2 1039h
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Sod2 1039h, supplied by Creative BioMart, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/Recombinant+Human+SOD2/pmc07185476-90-6-2
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sod2 1039h - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech 66474 1 ig
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
66474 1 Ig, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD2+Antibody/pmc06459929-13-7-9
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
66474 1 ig - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti superoxide dismutase
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Anti Superoxide Dismutase, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD-2+Antibody/pm41516180-175-39-43
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti superoxide dismutase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene pgfp v rs vector
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Pgfp V Rs Vector, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD2+Human+shRNA+Plasmid+Kit/pmc04651777-127-17-19
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pgfp v rs vector - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
St Johns Laboratory sod2
AOH induces oxidative stress in OVCAR3 cells. ( a ) Oxidative stress: The analysis of the generation of ROS with flow cytometry. ( b ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( c ) <t>SOD2</t> protein expression: Expression of SOD2 was evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( d ) SOD1, SOD2, PARP1 and XRCC1 gene expression: Relative expression of SOD1, SOD2 , PARP1 and XRCC1 . ( e ) DNA damage: evaluated with flow cytometry (ATM and H2A.X activation). ( f ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( g ) p-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved-PARP1 protein expression: Expression of phospho-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved—PARP1 evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( h ) Confocal microscopy: Bar graph showing the difference in normalized mean fluorescence intensity signal. ( i ) Immunofluorescent staining of phospho-H2A.X (green) and nucleus (orange, NucSpot 555 / 570). All the results are expressed as mean ± SE. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. AOH alternariol, G15 selective GPER1 receptor antagonist, G1 selective GPER1 agonist, SOD1 Superoxide dismutase 1, SOD2 Superoxide dismutase 2, PARP1 Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1, XRCC1 X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1, GAPDH anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, pH2AX phospho-H2A histone family member X. Cnt control (non-treated cells).
Sod2, supplied by St Johns Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/Anti-SOD2+Antibody/pmc12658207-78-9-27
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sod2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
OriGene rabbit anti sod2
AOH induces oxidative stress in OVCAR3 cells. ( a ) Oxidative stress: The analysis of the generation of ROS with flow cytometry. ( b ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( c ) <t>SOD2</t> protein expression: Expression of SOD2 was evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( d ) SOD1, SOD2, PARP1 and XRCC1 gene expression: Relative expression of SOD1, SOD2 , PARP1 and XRCC1 . ( e ) DNA damage: evaluated with flow cytometry (ATM and H2A.X activation). ( f ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( g ) p-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved-PARP1 protein expression: Expression of phospho-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved—PARP1 evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( h ) Confocal microscopy: Bar graph showing the difference in normalized mean fluorescence intensity signal. ( i ) Immunofluorescent staining of phospho-H2A.X (green) and nucleus (orange, NucSpot 555 / 570). All the results are expressed as mean ± SE. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. AOH alternariol, G15 selective GPER1 receptor antagonist, G1 selective GPER1 agonist, SOD1 Superoxide dismutase 1, SOD2 Superoxide dismutase 2, PARP1 Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1, XRCC1 X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1, GAPDH anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, pH2AX phospho-H2A histone family member X. Cnt control (non-treated cells).
Rabbit Anti Sod2, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sod2/SOD2+Rabbit+Polyclonal+Antibody/pm37055432-256-36-40
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti sod2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 3. Increased oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways are ameliorated by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment in DOX‑induced cardiomyopathy in mice. (A) AC16 cells treated with different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). (B) AC16 cells were treated with 1 µM DOX and different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). ****P<0.0001 vs. Control group; #P<0.05 and ####P<0.0001 vs. DOX‑only group; &&&P<0.001 vs. DOX + 25 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group; @@P<0.01 vs. DOX + 50 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group. (C) Levels of reactive oxygen species and (D) densitometric analysis in AC16 cells after treatment with DOX or DOX + 1,25(OH)2D3 via DCFH‑DA staining (n=5). *P<0.05 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Control; ###P<0.001 vs. DOX group. Levels of (E) MDA, (F) T‑SOD and (G) GSH‑Px in cardiac tissue 4 weeks after the first injection of DOX (n=5). (H) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (I) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densitometric analysis (n=3). (J) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (K) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densi‑ tometric analysis (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Sham; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 and ####P<0.001 vs. DOX. DOX, doxorubicin hydrochloride; CCK‑8, Cell Counting Kit‑8; ns, no significant difference; DCFH‑DA, 2',7'‑dichlorofluorescin diacetate; MDA, malondialdehyde; T, total; GSH‑Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear erythroid 2‑related factor 2; KEAP1, Kelch‑like ECH‑associated protein 1; ASC, caspase recruitment domain; NLRP3, nod‑like receptor family pyrin domain‑containing 3 inflammasome.

Journal: Experimental and therapeutic medicine

Article Title: 1,25(OH) 2 D 3 ameliorates doxorubicin‑induced cardiomyopathy by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome and oxidative stress.

doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12112

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Increased oxidative stress and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways are ameliorated by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment in DOX‑induced cardiomyopathy in mice. (A) AC16 cells treated with different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). (B) AC16 cells were treated with 1 µM DOX and different concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 (0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 nM) for 24 h. Cell viability was measured using CCK‑8 assay (n=3). ****P<0.0001 vs. Control group; #P<0.05 and ####P<0.0001 vs. DOX‑only group; &&&P<0.001 vs. DOX + 25 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group; @@P<0.01 vs. DOX + 50 nM 1,25(OH)2D3‑treated group. (C) Levels of reactive oxygen species and (D) densitometric analysis in AC16 cells after treatment with DOX or DOX + 1,25(OH)2D3 via DCFH‑DA staining (n=5). *P<0.05 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Control; ###P<0.001 vs. DOX group. Levels of (E) MDA, (F) T‑SOD and (G) GSH‑Px in cardiac tissue 4 weeks after the first injection of DOX (n=5). (H) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (I) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels of SOD1, SOD2, Nrf2 and KEAP1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densitometric analysis (n=3). (J) Western blotting images of cardiac tissue extracts analyzing protein expression of NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. GAPDH was used as the loading control. (K) Semi‑quantification of protein expression levels NLRP3, ASC and Caspase‑1. Protein expression levels relative to the Sham group were assessed by densi‑ tometric analysis (n=3). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 vs. Sham; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 and ####P<0.001 vs. DOX. DOX, doxorubicin hydrochloride; CCK‑8, Cell Counting Kit‑8; ns, no significant difference; DCFH‑DA, 2',7'‑dichlorofluorescin diacetate; MDA, malondialdehyde; T, total; GSH‑Px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear erythroid 2‑related factor 2; KEAP1, Kelch‑like ECH‑associated protein 1; ASC, caspase recruitment domain; NLRP3, nod‑like receptor family pyrin domain‑containing 3 inflammasome.

Article Snippet: The dilutions of primary antibodies used were as follows: Collagen I (cat. No. GTX26308; 1:1,000; GeneTex, Inc.), α‐SMA (α‐smooth muscle actin; cat. No. ab5694; 1:1,000; Abcam), IL‐1β (cat. no. ab9722; 0.25 μg/ml; Abcam), IL‐6 (cat. No. A0286; 1:1,000; Abclonal Biotech Co., Ltd.), TNF‐α (cat. No. GTX110520; 1:500; GeneTex, Inc.), SOD1 (cat. No. ab16831; 1:2,000; Abcam), SOD2 (cat. No. NB100‐1992; 1:2,000; Novus Biologicals, LLC), Nrf2 (cat. No. GTX135165; 1:1,000; GeneTex, Inc.), KEAP1 (Kelch‐like ECH‐associated protein 1; cat. No. ab119403; 1:1,000; Abcam), Caspase‐1 (cat. No. 83383; 1:500; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), NLRP3 (cat. No. ab214185; 1:1,000; Abcam), ASC (caspase recruitment domain; cat. No. GTX55818; 1:1,000; GeneTex, Inc.) and GAPDH (cat. No. 2118; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.).

Techniques: CCK-8 Assay, Control, Staining, Injection, Western Blot, Expressing

SOD1 and SOD2 protein expression. Western blotting analysis of superoxide enzymes cytosolic type 1 and mitochondrial type 2 was performed on young and elderly myoblasts and myotubes. β -Actin content was used for normalization. Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d) show SOD1 and SOD2 densitometric analysis of Western blots performed on three young and three old samples expressed as mean ± SEM. Representative patterns of SOD1, SOD2, and β -actin (as loading control) expression in young and elderly myoblasts and myotubes are shown in panels (e) and (f). The bands were taken from two nonadjacent lanes originating from exactly the same gel and blot with exactly the same exposure time, but spliced together indicated with double-dotted lines. Moreover, we performed no change in contrast ( ∗ p ≤ 0.05).

Journal: Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Article Title: Superoxide Anion Production and Bioenergetic Profile in Young and Elderly Human Primary Myoblasts

doi: 10.1155/2018/2615372

Figure Lengend Snippet: SOD1 and SOD2 protein expression. Western blotting analysis of superoxide enzymes cytosolic type 1 and mitochondrial type 2 was performed on young and elderly myoblasts and myotubes. β -Actin content was used for normalization. Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d) show SOD1 and SOD2 densitometric analysis of Western blots performed on three young and three old samples expressed as mean ± SEM. Representative patterns of SOD1, SOD2, and β -actin (as loading control) expression in young and elderly myoblasts and myotubes are shown in panels (e) and (f). The bands were taken from two nonadjacent lanes originating from exactly the same gel and blot with exactly the same exposure time, but spliced together indicated with double-dotted lines. Moreover, we performed no change in contrast ( ∗ p ≤ 0.05).

Article Snippet: Western blotting (WB) analysis was performed on 40 μ g lysates from young and old myoblasts and myotubes, using SOD1 (71G8) mouse mAb (number 4266, Cell Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 1 : 1000, SOD2 (D9V9C) rabbit mAb (number 13194, Cell Signalling Technology) at 1 : 1000, and β -actin (8H10D10) mouse mAb (number 3700, Cell Signalling Technology) at 1 : 1000, as primary antibody, and secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies (Cell Signalling Technology) at 1 : 5000.

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Control

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Journal: Cell metabolism

Article Title: SELECTIVE PERSULFIDE DETECTION REVEALS EVOLUTIONARILY CONSERVED ANTI-AGING EFFECTS OF S -SULFHYDRATION

doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.10.007

Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Article Snippet: MnSOD , Creative BioMart , Cat# SOD2-1039H.

Techniques: Ab Array, Recombinant, Protease Inhibitor, Magnetic Beads, Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Plasmid Preparation, Software

AOH induces oxidative stress in OVCAR3 cells. ( a ) Oxidative stress: The analysis of the generation of ROS with flow cytometry. ( b ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( c ) SOD2 protein expression: Expression of SOD2 was evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( d ) SOD1, SOD2, PARP1 and XRCC1 gene expression: Relative expression of SOD1, SOD2 , PARP1 and XRCC1 . ( e ) DNA damage: evaluated with flow cytometry (ATM and H2A.X activation). ( f ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( g ) p-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved-PARP1 protein expression: Expression of phospho-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved—PARP1 evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( h ) Confocal microscopy: Bar graph showing the difference in normalized mean fluorescence intensity signal. ( i ) Immunofluorescent staining of phospho-H2A.X (green) and nucleus (orange, NucSpot 555 / 570). All the results are expressed as mean ± SE. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. AOH alternariol, G15 selective GPER1 receptor antagonist, G1 selective GPER1 agonist, SOD1 Superoxide dismutase 1, SOD2 Superoxide dismutase 2, PARP1 Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1, XRCC1 X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1, GAPDH anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, pH2AX phospho-H2A histone family member X. Cnt control (non-treated cells).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: AOH induces oxidative stress and DNA damage in ovarian cancer cells via modulation of GPER1 and HIF1α/PI3K/CLDNs signaling pathway

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-26042-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: AOH induces oxidative stress in OVCAR3 cells. ( a ) Oxidative stress: The analysis of the generation of ROS with flow cytometry. ( b ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( c ) SOD2 protein expression: Expression of SOD2 was evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( d ) SOD1, SOD2, PARP1 and XRCC1 gene expression: Relative expression of SOD1, SOD2 , PARP1 and XRCC1 . ( e ) DNA damage: evaluated with flow cytometry (ATM and H2A.X activation). ( f ) Representative results of flow cytometry. ( g ) p-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved-PARP1 protein expression: Expression of phospho-H2A.X, PARP1 and cleaved—PARP1 evaluated with Western Blot, the representative results. ( h ) Confocal microscopy: Bar graph showing the difference in normalized mean fluorescence intensity signal. ( i ) Immunofluorescent staining of phospho-H2A.X (green) and nucleus (orange, NucSpot 555 / 570). All the results are expressed as mean ± SE. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. AOH alternariol, G15 selective GPER1 receptor antagonist, G1 selective GPER1 agonist, SOD1 Superoxide dismutase 1, SOD2 Superoxide dismutase 2, PARP1 Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1, XRCC1 X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1, GAPDH anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, pH2AX phospho-H2A histone family member X. Cnt control (non-treated cells).

Article Snippet: Akt (#9272), phospho-Akt (Ser473) (#4060), PARP1 (#46,011), SOD1 (#4266), SOD2 (#13,141), pH2AX (#9718), CLDN1 (#13,995), CLDN3 (#83,609), PI3K (#11,889), p44/42 (#4695), phospho-p44/42 (#4370), CLDN4 (STJ114778), GPER1 (STJ192629) (St John’s Laboratory Ltd, University Way, London) antibodies were used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Western Blot, Gene Expression, Activation Assay, Confocal Microscopy, Fluorescence, Staining, Control