simulation Search Results


gromacs molecular dynamics simulations  (Molecular Dynamics Inc)
86
Molecular Dynamics Inc gromacs molecular dynamics simulations
Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using <t>Gromacs</t> Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )
Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/gromacs+package+simulation/pmc12359856-205-178-179
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gromacs molecular dynamics simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mri simulator  (Psychology Software Tools)
92
Psychology Software Tools mri simulator
Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using <t>Gromacs</t> Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )
Mri Simulator, supplied by Psychology Software Tools, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/Encore+MRI+Simulator/pmc07036087-102-13-15
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mri simulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
pressure transducer simulator  (ADInstruments)
93
ADInstruments pressure transducer simulator
Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using <t>Gromacs</t> Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )
Pressure Transducer Simulator, supplied by ADInstruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/Pressure+Transducer+Simulator%2FTester+ce/pmc12746479-51-15-18
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pressure transducer simulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mock fmri scanner  (Psychology Software Tools)
91
Psychology Software Tools mock fmri scanner
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
Mock Fmri Scanner, supplied by Psychology Software Tools, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/Vera+MRI+Simulator/pmc08963826-172-29-34
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mock fmri scanner - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulations in sas  (SAS institute)
93
SAS institute simulations in sas
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
Simulations In Sas, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/SAS+Simulation+Studio/10__1046_slash_j__1420___9101__2000__00195__x-143-126-132
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulations in sas - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
atomistic molecular dynamics  (Molecular Dynamics Inc)
86
Molecular Dynamics Inc atomistic molecular dynamics
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
Atomistic Molecular Dynamics, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/atomistic+dynamics+molecular+simulations/pm41842908-8-60-61
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
atomistic molecular dynamics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
simulated intestinal fluid  (Ricca Chemical Company)
91
Ricca Chemical Company simulated intestinal fluid
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
Simulated Intestinal Fluid, supplied by Ricca Chemical Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/Simulated+Intestinal+Fluid+TS/pmc03908746-152-0-5
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
simulated intestinal fluid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
md simulation model  (Molecular Dynamics Inc)
86
Molecular Dynamics Inc md simulation model
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
Md Simulation Model, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/dynamics+molecular+simulations/pmc12749539-142-113-111
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
md simulation model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
18f fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography  (Philips Healthcare)
86
Philips Healthcare 18f fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
18f Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/aperture+computed+large+machine+positioning+simulation+tomography/pmc12575130-149-0-11
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
18f fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
beam shell cross section  (Abaqus Inc)
86
Abaqus Inc beam shell cross section
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
Beam Shell Cross Section, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/2d+bmg+cross+foam+section+simulated/10__2514_slash_1__j064695-206-131-137
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
beam shell cross section - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ray trace simulation results  (Edmund Optics)
86
Edmund Optics ray trace simulation results
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
Ray Trace Simulation Results, supplied by Edmund Optics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/ray+results+simulation+trace/10__1109_slash_tmi__2020__2971476-166-2-9
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ray trace simulation results - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
e6a simulation  (Morakot Industries Public Company Limited)
90
Morakot Industries Public Company Limited e6a simulation
Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the <t>fMRI</t> <t>scanner.</t> Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.
E6a Simulation, supplied by Morakot Industries Public Company Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/simulation/e6a+simulation/10__1016_slash_j__jhydrol__2013__02__018-160-6-26
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
e6a simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Journal: BMC Cancer

Article Title: Exploring the mutational spectrum of key kinase genes PIK3CA , BRAF , EGFR , ALK and ROS1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14609-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Article Snippet: Fig. 7 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 8 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 9 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 10 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 11 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 12 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 13 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 14 Average Rg values of interacting sites mutations for EGFR and ROS1 (Both WT and MT)

Techniques: Mutagenesis

Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Journal: BMC Cancer

Article Title: Exploring the mutational spectrum of key kinase genes PIK3CA , BRAF , EGFR , ALK and ROS1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14609-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Article Snippet: Fig. 7 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 8 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 9 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 10 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 11 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 12 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 13 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 14 Average Rg values of interacting sites mutations for EGFR and ROS1 (Both WT and MT)

Techniques: Mutagenesis

Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Journal: BMC Cancer

Article Title: Exploring the mutational spectrum of key kinase genes PIK3CA , BRAF , EGFR , ALK and ROS1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14609-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Article Snippet: Fig. 7 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 8 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 9 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 10 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 11 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 12 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 13 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 14 Average Rg values of interacting sites mutations for EGFR and ROS1 (Both WT and MT)

Techniques: Mutagenesis

Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Journal: BMC Cancer

Article Title: Exploring the mutational spectrum of key kinase genes PIK3CA , BRAF , EGFR , ALK and ROS1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14609-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Article Snippet: Fig. 7 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 8 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 9 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 10 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 11 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 12 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 13 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 14 Average Rg values of interacting sites mutations for EGFR and ROS1 (Both WT and MT)

Techniques: Mutagenesis

Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Journal: BMC Cancer

Article Title: Exploring the mutational spectrum of key kinase genes PIK3CA , BRAF , EGFR , ALK and ROS1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14609-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Article Snippet: Fig. 7 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 8 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 9 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 10 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 11 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 12 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 13 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 14 Average Rg values of interacting sites mutations for EGFR and ROS1 (Both WT and MT)

Techniques: Mutagenesis

Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Journal: BMC Cancer

Article Title: Exploring the mutational spectrum of key kinase genes PIK3CA , BRAF , EGFR , ALK and ROS1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14609-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Article Snippet: Fig. 7 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 8 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 9 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 10 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 11 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 12 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 13 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 14 Average Rg values of interacting sites mutations for EGFR and ROS1 (Both WT and MT)

Techniques: Mutagenesis

Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Journal: BMC Cancer

Article Title: Exploring the mutational spectrum of key kinase genes PIK3CA , BRAF , EGFR , ALK and ROS1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14609-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I )

Article Snippet: Fig. 7 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R521K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 8 Analysis of Wild and Mutant EGFR p.R831C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 9 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.S2229C Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 10 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.E1902K Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 11 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.K2228Q Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 12 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.P221S Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 13 Analysis of Wild and Mutant ROS1 p.D2213N Using Gromacs Molecular Dynamics Simulations ( A - G ) and Ramachandran Plot Profiles ( H - I ) Fig. 14 Average Rg values of interacting sites mutations for EGFR and ROS1 (Both WT and MT)

Techniques: Mutagenesis

Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the fMRI scanner. Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.

Journal: NeuroImage

Article Title: Age-related differences in brain activations during spatial memory formation in a well-learned virtual Morris water maze (vMWM) task

doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116069

Figure Lengend Snippet: Performance of young participants, older good performers, and older poor performers in the vMWM in place (A) and control (B) trials in the fMRI scanner. Means and standard errors (SEs) of place trial blocks were adjusted for the significant covariate effect of mean visible path length. The range of CCProx values along the vertical axis were kept identical in both panels to facilitate the comparison of values between trial types. Regardless of trial type, older poor performers were exceptional for exhibiting the highest CCProx values overall. Error bars depict ± 1 SE.

Article Snippet: 2.2.3. fMRI preparation and testing After completing in-lab practice and testing, the participants proceeded to complete four place and six visible trials (arranged in a randomized/interleaved sequence) in a mock fMRI scanner (MRI Simulator, Psychology Software Tools, Sharpsburg, PA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison