randomforest Search Results


90
RStudio randomforest package
Randomforest Package, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest package/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Salford Systems randomforests software
Randomforests Software, supplied by Salford Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforests software/product/Salford Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforests software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio r-software randomforest
R Software Randomforest, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/r-software randomforest/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
r-software randomforest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carollo Engineers randomforest model
Randomforest Model, supplied by Carollo Engineers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest model/product/Carollo Engineers
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Salford Systems random forest ensemble decision tree algorithm randomforest v5.1.0.179
Random Forest Ensemble Decision Tree Algorithm Randomforest V5.1.0.179, supplied by Salford Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/random forest ensemble decision tree algorithm randomforest v5.1.0.179/product/Salford Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
random forest ensemble decision tree algorithm randomforest v5.1.0.179 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio randomforest v. 4.6.14
Randomforest V. 4.6.14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest v. 4.6.14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest v. 4.6.14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Salford Systems randomforests v6.40.179
Randomforests V6.40.179, supplied by Salford Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforests v6.40.179/product/Salford Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforests v6.40.179 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio randomforest r-package version 4.6-14
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Randomforest R Package Version 4.6 14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest r-package version 4.6-14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest r-package version 4.6-14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio randomforest method using the gini coefficient
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Randomforest Method Using The Gini Coefficient, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest method using the gini coefficient/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest method using the gini coefficient - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Salford Systems randomforests
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Randomforests, supplied by Salford Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforests/product/Salford Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RStudio randomforest function
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Randomforest Function, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest function/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Minitab Inc randomforest in r version
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Randomforest In R Version, supplied by Minitab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest in r version/product/Minitab Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest in r version - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by RandomForest. (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).

Journal: Protein Engineering, Design and Selection

Article Title: Adaption of human antibody λ and κ light chain architectures to CDR repertoires

doi: 10.1093/protein/gzz012

Figure Lengend Snippet: Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by RandomForest. (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).

Article Snippet: R-studio was used to perform the RandomForest analyses (randomForest R-package version 4.6-14) ( ).

Techniques: Sequencing, Residue