presentation 10.3 software Search Results


90
neurobehavioral systems inc presentation software version 10.3
Presentation Software Version 10.3, supplied by neurobehavioral systems inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/presentation+10%2E3+software/presentation+software+v10+3/pm37508451-60-10-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
presentation software version 10.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
neurobehavioral systems inc presentation 10.3 software
Presentation 10.3 Software, supplied by neurobehavioral systems inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/presentation+10%2E3+software/presentation+10+1+software+package/pmc03563336-253-6-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
presentation 10.3 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
neurobehavioral systems inc presentation 10.3
Presentation 10.3, supplied by neurobehavioral systems inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/presentation+10%2E3+software/presentation+10+3/pm24373886-59-26-28
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
presentation 10.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
neurobehavioral systems inc presentation version 10.3
Tasks and experimental design . The visual display consisted of four rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams presented simultaneously in each visual field quadrant and a pair of faces presented horizontally. Task relevance is indicated in red. (A) Match digits low task. Subjects had to monitor the lower left stream for the appearance of digits and indicate via button press if the digits matched or mismatched the target. Distractor streams had to be ignored. (B) Match digits high task. The upper left and lower right RSVP streams were defined as target locations. Simultaneously appearing digits were considered as targets. Participants had to indicate via button press whether the digits were the same (match) or different (mismatch). (C) Match gender task. Subjects had to attend the faces and determine whether they match in gender (match) or not (mismatch). (D) Match emotion task. Subjects had to decide whether the facial expressions match (match) or not (mismatch). (E) Spatial location of the face stimuli. Pairs of faces were presented either in the central-, mid-, or peripheral-position. (F) The <t>stimulation</t> paradigm employed for functional imaging. One block consisted of four different tasks, each lasting 20 s, separated by a Fixation condition and repeated three times.
Presentation Version 10.3, supplied by neurobehavioral systems inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/presentation+10%2E3+software/presentation+version+17+0/pmc03001994-121-13-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
presentation version 10.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
neurobehavioral systems inc presentation software (version 10.3
Tasks and experimental design . The visual display consisted of four rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams presented simultaneously in each visual field quadrant and a pair of faces presented horizontally. Task relevance is indicated in red. (A) Match digits low task. Subjects had to monitor the lower left stream for the appearance of digits and indicate via button press if the digits matched or mismatched the target. Distractor streams had to be ignored. (B) Match digits high task. The upper left and lower right RSVP streams were defined as target locations. Simultaneously appearing digits were considered as targets. Participants had to indicate via button press whether the digits were the same (match) or different (mismatch). (C) Match gender task. Subjects had to attend the faces and determine whether they match in gender (match) or not (mismatch). (D) Match emotion task. Subjects had to decide whether the facial expressions match (match) or not (mismatch). (E) Spatial location of the face stimuli. Pairs of faces were presented either in the central-, mid-, or peripheral-position. (F) The <t>stimulation</t> paradigm employed for functional imaging. One block consisted of four different tasks, each lasting 20 s, separated by a Fixation condition and repeated three times.
Presentation Software (Version 10.3, supplied by neurobehavioral systems inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/presentation+10%2E3+software/presentation+software/pmc10376409-62-10-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
presentation software (version 10.3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Tasks and experimental design . The visual display consisted of four rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams presented simultaneously in each visual field quadrant and a pair of faces presented horizontally. Task relevance is indicated in red. (A) Match digits low task. Subjects had to monitor the lower left stream for the appearance of digits and indicate via button press if the digits matched or mismatched the target. Distractor streams had to be ignored. (B) Match digits high task. The upper left and lower right RSVP streams were defined as target locations. Simultaneously appearing digits were considered as targets. Participants had to indicate via button press whether the digits were the same (match) or different (mismatch). (C) Match gender task. Subjects had to attend the faces and determine whether they match in gender (match) or not (mismatch). (D) Match emotion task. Subjects had to decide whether the facial expressions match (match) or not (mismatch). (E) Spatial location of the face stimuli. Pairs of faces were presented either in the central-, mid-, or peripheral-position. (F) The stimulation paradigm employed for functional imaging. One block consisted of four different tasks, each lasting 20 s, separated by a Fixation condition and repeated three times.

Journal: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Article Title: Diverting Attention Suppresses Human Amygdala Responses to Faces

doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00226

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tasks and experimental design . The visual display consisted of four rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams presented simultaneously in each visual field quadrant and a pair of faces presented horizontally. Task relevance is indicated in red. (A) Match digits low task. Subjects had to monitor the lower left stream for the appearance of digits and indicate via button press if the digits matched or mismatched the target. Distractor streams had to be ignored. (B) Match digits high task. The upper left and lower right RSVP streams were defined as target locations. Simultaneously appearing digits were considered as targets. Participants had to indicate via button press whether the digits were the same (match) or different (mismatch). (C) Match gender task. Subjects had to attend the faces and determine whether they match in gender (match) or not (mismatch). (D) Match emotion task. Subjects had to decide whether the facial expressions match (match) or not (mismatch). (E) Spatial location of the face stimuli. Pairs of faces were presented either in the central-, mid-, or peripheral-position. (F) The stimulation paradigm employed for functional imaging. One block consisted of four different tasks, each lasting 20 s, separated by a Fixation condition and repeated three times.

Article Snippet: All visual stimuli were presented on LCD-goggles (Resonance Technology, Northridge, USA) using the stimulation software Presentation (Version 10.3, Neurobehavioral Systems, USA).

Techniques: Functional Assay, Imaging, Blocking Assay