mhc ii Search Results


90
R&D Systems anti mhc class i
Anti Mhc Class I, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mhc class i/product/R&D Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mhc class i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mhcii lgii 612 14 68258s
Mhcii Lgii 612 14 68258s, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mhcii lgii 612 14 68258s/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mhcii lgii 612 14 68258s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cytek Biosciences apc cyanine7 anti mouse mhc class ii i a i e
Apc Cyanine7 Anti Mouse Mhc Class Ii I A I E, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/apc cyanine7 anti mouse mhc class ii i a i e/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc cyanine7 anti mouse mhc class ii i a i e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences mhcii pe cy7
Mhcii Pe Cy7, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mhcii pe cy7/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mhcii pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech hla dra
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
Hla Dra, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hla dra/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hla dra - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Santa Cruz Biotechnology rat anti mouse mhc class ii monoclonal
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
Rat Anti Mouse Mhc Class Ii Monoclonal, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti mouse mhc class ii monoclonal/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti mouse mhc class ii monoclonal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio-Rad mouse anti mhc ii
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
Mouse Anti Mhc Ii, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti mhc ii/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti mhc ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bio X Cell invivomab anti mouse mhc class ii
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
Invivomab Anti Mouse Mhc Class Ii, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/invivomab anti mouse mhc class ii/product/Bio X Cell
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
invivomab anti mouse mhc class ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio X Cell m5 114
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
M5 114, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/m5 114/product/Bio X Cell
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m5 114 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Elabscience Biotechnology major histocompatibility complex class ii mchii e ab f0990e
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
Major Histocompatibility Complex Class Ii Mchii E Ab F0990e, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/major histocompatibility complex class ii mchii e ab f0990e/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
major histocompatibility complex class ii mchii e ab f0990e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals mhc ii
Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where <t>MHC</t> <t>II</t> + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).
Mhc Ii, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mhc ii/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mhc ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals anti mhc class ii
Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where <t>MHC</t> <t>II</t> + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).
Anti Mhc Class Ii, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mhc class ii/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mhc class ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages (HLA-DRA + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: Dual regulation of CXCR6+CD8+ T cells modulates cytotoxic and exhaustion-associated programs during prostate cancer progression

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-014276

Figure Lengend Snippet: M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages (HLA-DRA + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.

Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against CD8 (Abcam, ab17147; 1:200), CXCR6 (Abcam, ab8023; 1:100), CXCL16 (ProteinTech Group, 60123-1-Ig; 1:100), CD68 (Abcam, ab125212; 1:200), iNOS (Abcam, ab3523; 1:200), HLA-DRA (ProteinTech Group, 17221-1-AP; 1:100), CD163 (Abcam, ab182422; 1:200), KLF2 (ABclonal, A16480; 1:200), FOXO1 (ProteinTech Group, 18592-1-AP; 1:100), Granzyme B (Thermo Fisher, MA1-80734; 1:100), α-SMA (Abcam, ab5694; 1:100) and AR (Abcam, ab133273; 1:100).

Techniques: Expressing, Marker, Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Multiplex Assay, Immunohistochemistry, Saline

IL-10–STAT3–FOXO1 signaling reprograms CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells toward a dysfunctional state. ( A ) Dot plot showing the expression of IL10RA , STAT3 , STAT4 , CXCR6 , and related markers across CD8 + T cell subsets in scRNA-seq data. ( B ) IL-10 pathway activity scores across CD8 + T cell clusters. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. (C, D) Murine splenic CD8 + T cells cultured in a medium containing anti-CD3 (5 µg/mL), anti-CD28 (5 µg/mL), and IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for 48 hours. Following initial activation, cells were maintained in fresh medium supplemented with IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for an additional 7 days. On day 9, cells were treated with 20 ng/mL murine IL-10, IL-15, or STAT3 inhibitor Stattic (2 µM) for 24 hours. The protein expression of STAT3, p-STATS, FOXO1, KLF2, and CXCR6 was assessed by Western blot analysis. (E, F) Flow cytometry of mouse spleen-derived CD8 + T cells shows preferential expression of IL-10R on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells, with upregulation observed following TCR stimulation (anti-CD3/CD28+IL-2, day 10), indicating heightened susceptibility to IL-10-mediated signaling. (G–I) Flow cytometry of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) CD8 + T cells from healthy donors similarly demonstrates enhanced IL-10R expression on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells and its induction on TCR stimulation. ( J ) PCA of bulk RNA-seq. Prostate tissues from Pb-Cre; Pten flox/flox ( T ) and WT mice (n=3/group) were profiled by bulk RNA-seq. PCA separated T (blue) from WT (red) chiefly along PC1 (87.24% variance) and PC2 (5.64%). ( K ) Sample-to-sample distance heatmap. Distance matrix based on transformed expression values shows tight clustering of biological replicates within genotype and clear segregation between T and WT. ( L ) Volcano plot. Differential expression analysis between T and WT (cut-offs |log2FC|≥1.5, FDR<0.05). Points are colored by direction (Up=red; Down=blue). Dashed lines indicate thresholds. Il10 , Mrc1 , Cd163 , and Cxcr6 are highlighted in purple; other selected genes are labeled as indicated. Y-axis shows –log 10 (adjusted p). ( M ) Multiplex immunofluorescence (human prostate). Representative fields from human prostate specimens (n=9). Channels: DAPI (nuclei), CD68 (pan-macrophage), HLA-DRA (M1-like macrophage), CD163 (M2-like macrophage), and IL-10. IL-10 signal is enriched in tumor regions and co-localizes with CD68 + CD163 + macrophages. Scale bar: 20 µm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FDR, false discovery rate; PCA, principal component analysis; scRNA-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing; WT, wild-type.

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: Dual regulation of CXCR6+CD8+ T cells modulates cytotoxic and exhaustion-associated programs during prostate cancer progression

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-014276

Figure Lengend Snippet: IL-10–STAT3–FOXO1 signaling reprograms CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells toward a dysfunctional state. ( A ) Dot plot showing the expression of IL10RA , STAT3 , STAT4 , CXCR6 , and related markers across CD8 + T cell subsets in scRNA-seq data. ( B ) IL-10 pathway activity scores across CD8 + T cell clusters. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. (C, D) Murine splenic CD8 + T cells cultured in a medium containing anti-CD3 (5 µg/mL), anti-CD28 (5 µg/mL), and IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for 48 hours. Following initial activation, cells were maintained in fresh medium supplemented with IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for an additional 7 days. On day 9, cells were treated with 20 ng/mL murine IL-10, IL-15, or STAT3 inhibitor Stattic (2 µM) for 24 hours. The protein expression of STAT3, p-STATS, FOXO1, KLF2, and CXCR6 was assessed by Western blot analysis. (E, F) Flow cytometry of mouse spleen-derived CD8 + T cells shows preferential expression of IL-10R on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells, with upregulation observed following TCR stimulation (anti-CD3/CD28+IL-2, day 10), indicating heightened susceptibility to IL-10-mediated signaling. (G–I) Flow cytometry of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) CD8 + T cells from healthy donors similarly demonstrates enhanced IL-10R expression on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells and its induction on TCR stimulation. ( J ) PCA of bulk RNA-seq. Prostate tissues from Pb-Cre; Pten flox/flox ( T ) and WT mice (n=3/group) were profiled by bulk RNA-seq. PCA separated T (blue) from WT (red) chiefly along PC1 (87.24% variance) and PC2 (5.64%). ( K ) Sample-to-sample distance heatmap. Distance matrix based on transformed expression values shows tight clustering of biological replicates within genotype and clear segregation between T and WT. ( L ) Volcano plot. Differential expression analysis between T and WT (cut-offs |log2FC|≥1.5, FDR<0.05). Points are colored by direction (Up=red; Down=blue). Dashed lines indicate thresholds. Il10 , Mrc1 , Cd163 , and Cxcr6 are highlighted in purple; other selected genes are labeled as indicated. Y-axis shows –log 10 (adjusted p). ( M ) Multiplex immunofluorescence (human prostate). Representative fields from human prostate specimens (n=9). Channels: DAPI (nuclei), CD68 (pan-macrophage), HLA-DRA (M1-like macrophage), CD163 (M2-like macrophage), and IL-10. IL-10 signal is enriched in tumor regions and co-localizes with CD68 + CD163 + macrophages. Scale bar: 20 µm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FDR, false discovery rate; PCA, principal component analysis; scRNA-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing; WT, wild-type.

Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against CD8 (Abcam, ab17147; 1:200), CXCR6 (Abcam, ab8023; 1:100), CXCL16 (ProteinTech Group, 60123-1-Ig; 1:100), CD68 (Abcam, ab125212; 1:200), iNOS (Abcam, ab3523; 1:200), HLA-DRA (ProteinTech Group, 17221-1-AP; 1:100), CD163 (Abcam, ab182422; 1:200), KLF2 (ABclonal, A16480; 1:200), FOXO1 (ProteinTech Group, 18592-1-AP; 1:100), Granzyme B (Thermo Fisher, MA1-80734; 1:100), α-SMA (Abcam, ab5694; 1:100) and AR (Abcam, ab133273; 1:100).

Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Cell Culture, Activation Assay, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay, RNA Sequencing, Transformation Assay, Quantitative Proteomics, Labeling, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Single Cell

Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where MHC II + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).

Journal: Biology of reproduction

Article Title: Identification and characterization of a novel CD2-positive cell population in the seminiferous tubule of Fischer CDF344 rats

doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf162

Figure Lengend Snippet: Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where MHC II + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).

Article Snippet: MHC II , Novus Biologicals , NBP3-09015.

Techniques: Staining, Microscopy, Immunolabeling, Membrane

(A, B) Representative confocal photomicrographs of whole mount seminiferous tubules from rats at 48 h post-exposure, green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein, n = 5. (A) Corn oil. (B) MEHP treatment group. (C) Graph presenting the average number of PTM φ per 10 5 area, MEHP-exposed animals showed a significant increase in MHC II + PTM φ s, calculating changes in PTM φ s number with n = 5 rats per treatment group. (D) Representative confocal photomicrograph of whole-mount seminiferous tubules from rats 48 h post-exposure from the corn oil–treated animals (red—CD2 + cells and green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein). (E) A representative confocal photomicrograph from the MEHP treatment. (F) Graph presenting the average ± SEM (standard error of the mean) of PTM φ s-CD2 + cells (red) interaction per 10 5 area. The average number of cellular interactions between the PTM φ s and CD2 + cells increased significantly in the MEHP-exposure group when compared to the corn oil–treated group, ( n = 5/group). Scale bar: 15 μ m applies to all the images in this panel.

Journal: Biology of reproduction

Article Title: Identification and characterization of a novel CD2-positive cell population in the seminiferous tubule of Fischer CDF344 rats

doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf162

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A, B) Representative confocal photomicrographs of whole mount seminiferous tubules from rats at 48 h post-exposure, green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein, n = 5. (A) Corn oil. (B) MEHP treatment group. (C) Graph presenting the average number of PTM φ per 10 5 area, MEHP-exposed animals showed a significant increase in MHC II + PTM φ s, calculating changes in PTM φ s number with n = 5 rats per treatment group. (D) Representative confocal photomicrograph of whole-mount seminiferous tubules from rats 48 h post-exposure from the corn oil–treated animals (red—CD2 + cells and green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein). (E) A representative confocal photomicrograph from the MEHP treatment. (F) Graph presenting the average ± SEM (standard error of the mean) of PTM φ s-CD2 + cells (red) interaction per 10 5 area. The average number of cellular interactions between the PTM φ s and CD2 + cells increased significantly in the MEHP-exposure group when compared to the corn oil–treated group, ( n = 5/group). Scale bar: 15 μ m applies to all the images in this panel.

Article Snippet: MHC II , Novus Biologicals , NBP3-09015.

Techniques: Labeling